RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00236
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 JUL 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart
(PH).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes he is entitled to the PH. He sustained a shell fragment
wound to the nose in July 1968 in Da Nang, Vietnam and has established
a service-connected disability rating for the injury.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 22 April
1966, as an basic airman for a period of four years.
His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the National Defense Service
Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with two Bronze Stars (BS),
Republic of Vietnam Commendation Medal (RVCM), and the Air Force Good
Conduct Medal (AFGCM).
The applicant’s records further reflect he was assigned in Vietnam
from 7 December 1967 through 8 December 1968.
On 21 April 1970, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade
of sergeant. He served four years of active duty service.
A Department of Veterans Affairs rating decision dated 17 March 1982
reflects the applicant is receiving a combined 10 percent
service connected disability rating, however, the service connection
for the shell fragment, nose wound was rated at zero percent.
The applicant submitted an application dated 19 March 1982 requesting
award of the PH. On 11 August 1982, the applicant was informed that
the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) reviewed his request for award of
the PH and denied the request due to insufficient evidence.
On 12 August 1987, the applicant was informed his request for award of
the PH did not meet the criteria for award of the PH.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the PH
be denied. DPPPR states the PH is awarded for wounds received as a
direct result of enemy action, such as, gunshot, or shrapnel wound,
hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.
In addition the wounds must have received treatment by medical
personnel. Indirect injuries do not meet the criteria for award of
the PH. These injuries include, but are not limited to, injuries
received while seeking shelter from mortar or rocket attacks, aircraft
bombings, grenades, and injuries incurred while serving as an aircrew
member or in a passenger status as a result of the aircraft’s evasive
measures against hostile fire.
HQ AFPC/DPPPR further states the applicant’s request for award of the
PH was forwarded to the PHRB on 5 April 2006 and they determined his
request did not have sufficient medical documentation for approval of
the PH.
They further stated upon reviewing the applicant’s military record
they verified his entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award
with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with
Palm (RVNGC w/P) and his records will be administratively corrected to
reflect those awards.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
28 April 2006, for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
On 7 May 2006, the applicant requested that his application be
temporarily withdrawn (Exhibit E).
In a letter dated 18 may 1960 (sic), Mr. M. B states he believes the
applicant received a shrapnel injury to his nose in June or early July
1968 (Exhibit F).
On 24 May 2006, the Board staff informed the applicant that his case
had been temporarily withdrawn per his 7 May 2006 request and to
contact the Board in writing when he was ready to proceed with his
application (Exhibit G).
On 21 July 2006, the Board staff in response to a congressional
inquiry from Senator Feinstein office informed them the applicant’s
case had been temporarily withdrawn (Exhibit H).
On 4 August 2006, the applicant requested that his case be reopened
(Exhibit I).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice warranting awarding the
applicant the Purple Heart medal. After reviewing the documentation
submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient evidence
to support award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provided with his
request several statements from former servicemembers attesting to the
incident at DaNang and the injuries he received in July 1968. In view
of the circumstances of this case, the Board believes any doubt in
this matter should be resolved in the favor of the applicant.
Therefore, the Board recommends that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the
Purple Heart Medal for injuries sustained as a direct result of enemy
action during a rocket attack on the flightline while
assigned to the 390th Tactical Fighter Squadron, DaNang, Vietnam in
July 1968.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board this application in Executive
Session on 14 September 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-00236 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jan 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, 13 Apr 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Apr 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 May 06
Exhibit F. Letter, Mr. B., dated 18 May 1960 (sic).
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 May 06.
Exhibit H. Letter, Congressional Response dated 21 Jul 06,
w/atch
Exhibit I. Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Aug 06.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00236
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116) it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that he was
awarded the Purple Heart Medal for injuries sustained as a direct
result of enemy action during a rocket attack on the flightline while
assigned to the 390th Tactical Fighter Squadron, DaNang, Vietnam in
July 1968.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Applicant’s records reflect that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (with two Bronze Service Stars (BSS)), Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (with one oak leaf cluster). The Purple Heart medal is awarded to personnel for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00042
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that there is no evidence in the applicant’s medical or personnel records to substantiate that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action. On 2 Mar 05, the applicant’s military record was forwarded to the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), the approval authority for the award of the PH. As of this date, no response has been...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00294
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the PH be denied. DPPPR states to be awarded the PH, a servicemember must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02775
To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. Each request is considered on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Neither evidence provided by the applicant nor the service-member’s records substantiate he was injured as a direct result of enemy action...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00216
On 23 February 2006, the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) reviewed and denied the applicant’s request for award of the PH. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal for injuries sustained as a direct result of enemy action during an aerial combat mission over Weimar, Germany on 24 August...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03832
DPPPR states to be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. After a thorough review of the former member’s wife’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the PH Medal. Novel, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 05, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02262
In accordance with Army Regulation 600-45, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against the enemy or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided the wound necessitated treatment by medical personnel. The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, has the authority to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the PH. The PH is awarded for injuries received as a direct result of enemy action.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00648
His medical records contain ample documentation to substantiate his injuries. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00535
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the PH be denied. They state the PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action and the wounds must have received treatment by medical personnel. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 May 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01465
The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH on 1 November 2005. Applicant’s personal statement is noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include his service medical records, we find no corroborative evidence to establish that he was treated for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action during a rocket attack on 28 February 1968. ________________________________________________________________ The...