Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003002
Original file (0003002.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  00-03002
            INDEX CODE:  100.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

Applicant requests that his DD Form 214  (Certificate  of  Release  or
Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected as follows:

            a.   Item 12b (Separation Date  This  Period)  be  changed
from 31 May 2001 to 31 May 2000.

             b.    Award  of  the  Air  Medal  be  added  to  Item  13
(Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign  Ribbons  Awarded
or Authorized).

            c.   Add KC-10A  Instructor  Qualification  Course,  March
1999, to Item 14 (Military Education).

              d.     Add   Dalfort   Aviation   Boeing   727   Systems
Familiarization Course, June 1992 to Item 14.

Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

We note that the applicant’s DD Form  214  has  been  administratively
corrected to reflect a separation date of 31 May 00, award of the  Air
Medal, and the KC-10A Instructor  Qualification  Course,  March  1999,
added under Military Education.  Therefore, the remaining issue to  be
resolved by this Board is his request  to  add  the  Dalfort  Aviation
Boeing 727 Systems Familiarization Course, June 1992, to his records.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated  applicant's  requests  and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit C).   The  advisory
opinion was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for  review  and  response
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received  by  this
office.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and  the  available
evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to  warrant  corrective  action  in  regard  to  applicant’s
request to add the Dalfort Aviation Boeing 727 Systems Familiarization
Course to his DD Form 214.  The Air Force  indicated  that  they  have
exhausted all sources to find a Personnel Data System (PDS) code  that
confirms applicant’s request  for  the  Dalfort  Aviation  Boeing  727
Systems Familiarization Course.  Therefore, in view of the  foregoing,
we find no basis to recommend granting this portion of his request.


The Board staff is directed to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of  new  relevant  evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.

Members of the Board Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Mr.  Lawrence  R.  Leehy,
and Ms. Marilyn Thomas considered this application on 18 April 2001 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction  36-2603,  and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.



                                        PATRICK R. WHEELER
                                  Panel Chair
Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02210

    Original file (BC 2014 02210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PRB will be convened to review the trainee’s records and recommend continuing training, retraining, modify training or an FEB. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s requests and states that the FEB’s final approval authority determined the applicant should be permanently disqualified from aviation service. The complete A3TK evaluation is at Exhibit G. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AMC/A3TK advisory states that there was a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01840

    Original file (BC-2005-01840.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, his counsel's statement, and documentation associated with his FEB. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The USAFE/A3 evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel responded that there was no substantial evidence the applicant failed to prepare for his flying training. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03826

    Original file (BC-2002-03826.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He receive supplemental consideration for promotion by the CY99A Central Major Selection Board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPE states the applicant alleges his DAFSC, Duty Title, Key Duty description and the first bullet of Section IV of his PRF that was reviewed by the central selection board were incorrect. The applicant has not provided any documentation that the correct duty information was not considered during the PRF process.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101004

    Original file (0101004.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He did not meet the flying proficiency standards of the USAF Weapons School and his training report is an accurate reflection of that fact.” The AFPC/DPPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, B-2/B-52 Bomber Assignment, AFPC/DPAOC, stated that the DAFSC should be corrected to read Q12B3C on the training report. The applicant agrees with AFPC/DPAOC that the DAFSC on the training report should be Q12B3C (Exhibit F-2). We noted the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003214

    Original file (0003214.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current Air Force policy (AFI 36-2502) dictates that in order to be credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close-out date of a decoration must be on or before the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECD) and the award must be placed in official channels [date the RDP is signed] before the selections for that cycle are made. The author of the award and the applicant’s former commander assert that the RDP was placed in official channels in time but, due to the organization’s flawed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0002173

    Original file (0002173.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02173 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 30 Aug 98 through 29 Aug 99 be declared void and removed from his records. Based on the reason(s) for the referral EPR, the applicant’s commander could very well have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003147

    Original file (0003147.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9601139A

    Original file (9601139A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 23 Jan 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see Exhibit F). We have reviewed the entire application and the additional documentation submitted. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002420

    Original file (0002420.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02420 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Air Medal. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801722

    Original file (9801722.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 The applicant is requesting his records be...