RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03002
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected as follows:
a. Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) be changed
from 31 May 2001 to 31 May 2000.
b. Award of the Air Medal be added to Item 13
(Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded
or Authorized).
c. Add KC-10A Instructor Qualification Course, March
1999, to Item 14 (Military Education).
d. Add Dalfort Aviation Boeing 727 Systems
Familiarization Course, June 1992 to Item 14.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
We note that the applicant’s DD Form 214 has been administratively
corrected to reflect a separation date of 31 May 00, award of the Air
Medal, and the KC-10A Instructor Qualification Course, March 1999,
added under Military Education. Therefore, the remaining issue to be
resolved by this Board is his request to add the Dalfort Aviation
Boeing 727 Systems Familiarization Course, June 1992, to his records.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's requests and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit C). The advisory
opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action in regard to applicant’s
request to add the Dalfort Aviation Boeing 727 Systems Familiarization
Course to his DD Form 214. The Air Force indicated that they have
exhausted all sources to find a Personnel Data System (PDS) code that
confirms applicant’s request for the Dalfort Aviation Boeing 727
Systems Familiarization Course. Therefore, in view of the foregoing,
we find no basis to recommend granting this portion of his request.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy,
and Ms. Marilyn Thomas considered this application on 18 April 2001 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
PATRICK R. WHEELER
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02210
The PRB will be convened to review the trainees records and recommend continuing training, retraining, modify training or an FEB. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicants requests and states that the FEBs final approval authority determined the applicant should be permanently disqualified from aviation service. The complete A3TK evaluation is at Exhibit G. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AMC/A3TK advisory states that there was a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01840
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, his counsel's statement, and documentation associated with his FEB. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The USAFE/A3 evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel responded that there was no substantial evidence the applicant failed to prepare for his flying training. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03826
He receive supplemental consideration for promotion by the CY99A Central Major Selection Board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPE states the applicant alleges his DAFSC, Duty Title, Key Duty description and the first bullet of Section IV of his PRF that was reviewed by the central selection board were incorrect. The applicant has not provided any documentation that the correct duty information was not considered during the PRF process.
He did not meet the flying proficiency standards of the USAF Weapons School and his training report is an accurate reflection of that fact.” The AFPC/DPPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, B-2/B-52 Bomber Assignment, AFPC/DPAOC, stated that the DAFSC should be corrected to read Q12B3C on the training report. The applicant agrees with AFPC/DPAOC that the DAFSC on the training report should be Q12B3C (Exhibit F-2). We noted the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...
Current Air Force policy (AFI 36-2502) dictates that in order to be credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close-out date of a decoration must be on or before the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECD) and the award must be placed in official channels [date the RDP is signed] before the selections for that cycle are made. The author of the award and the applicant’s former commander assert that the RDP was placed in official channels in time but, due to the organization’s flawed...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02173 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 30 Aug 98 through 29 Aug 99 be declared void and removed from his records. Based on the reason(s) for the referral EPR, the applicant’s commander could very well have...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 23 Jan 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see Exhibit F). We have reviewed the entire application and the additional documentation submitted. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02420 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Air Medal. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's...
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 The applicant is requesting his records be...