Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002997
Original file (0002997.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  00-02997
            INDEX NUMBER:  131.03

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He receive consideration by a special board in lieu of the June  2000  Major
Continuation Board.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust  and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts  pertaining  to  this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter  prepared  by  the
appropriate office of the Air Force.   Accordingly,  there  is  no  need  to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Reserve of the  Air  Force  Selection  Board  Secretariat,  HQ ARPC/DPB,
reviewed  this  application  and  recommended  denial  of  the   applicant’s
request.  They state the applicant was notified of his selection to  meet  a
continuation board.  He acknowledges that he  was  required  to  return  the
form and specify his desire to meet the board, but did not do so.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant indicated that  he  did  not  return  the  postcard  to  meet  the
continuation board because  of  extenuating  circumstances  and  a  lack  of
understanding of its importance at the time.   Applicant  further  describes
the circumstances which led to him not meeting the suspense  date  in  order
to make his desires to meet the continuation board  known.   Applicant  also
states that the subject of the continuation  board  never  came  up  at  his
reserve training meetings nor did he recall any description  of  it  in  the
reserve magazine.

Applicant requests that the board consider if it’s not  a  possibility  that
an  individual  balancing  an  Air  Force  Reserve  career,  a  senior-level
civilian position, an active family, and civic responsibilities,  could  hit
a period where the intensity of activity allowed for something as  vital  as
a continuation board notice to slip through the cracks.  He asks  the  board
to consider his  years  and  quality  of  service  and  he  hopes  that  the
circumstances surrounding his failure to return the notice  and  his  desire
to continue will persuade the board to facilitate meeting a special board.

Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error  or  injustice  warranting  consideration  by  a
special board in lieu of the June  2000  Major  Continuation  Board.   Based
upon the evidence of record and the applicant’s  submission,  the  Board  is
persuaded  that  there  were  extenuating  circumstances   surrounding   the
applicant’s failure to return the  postcard  indicating  his  desire  to  be
considered by the continuation board.  Although the Board does not take  the
applicant’s failure to meet the suspense in the time  allotted  lightly,  we
do understand the sometimes impossible task of balancing both an  Air  Force
Reserve and a  civilian  career.   Based  upon  the  applicant’s  years  and
quality of service, we believe it is in the interest  of  justice  that  the
applicant’s request be granted.  Therefore,  we  recommend  the  applicant's
records be corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be considered for  continuation  by  a  Special  Review  Board
(SRB); that his record be  evaluated  in  comparison  with  the  records  of
officers who were and were not selected by the June 2000 Air  Force  Reserve
Major Continuation Board; and, if he is recommended for  continuation  by  a
Special Review Board,  the  Air  Force  Board  for  Correction  of  Military
Records be advised of that recommendation at the earliest practicable  date,
so that all necessary and appropriate actions may be completed.

If he is not recommended for continuation by the Special Review  Board,  the
office of primary responsibility advise him of  the  recommendation  of  the
Special Review Board.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 13 March 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
            Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
            Mr. Steven A. Shaw, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 October 2000.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ ARPC/DPB, dated 13 December 2000.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 January 2001.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, undated.





               THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
               Vice Chair





AFBCMR 00-02997



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be considered for continuation by a Special Review
Board (SRB); that his record be evaluated in comparison with the records of
officers who were and were not selected by the June 2000 Air Force Reserve
Major Continuation Board; and, if he is recommended for continuation by a
Special Review Board, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military
Records be advised of that recommendation at the earliest practicable date,
so that all necessary and appropriate actions may be completed.

      If he is not recommended for continuation by the Special Review
Board, the office of primary responsibility advise him of the
recommendation of the Special Review Board.





                                        JOE G. LINEBERGER
                                        Director
                                        Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002455

    Original file (0002455.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His letters were available to selection boards and were, at the time of the boards, in his OSB. However, we do agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicant’s officer selection briefs (OSBs) that met both promotion boards and the continuation board did in fact contain errors. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02947

    Original file (BC-2004-02947.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is further recommended that his record, to include the attached Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, signed by Colonel Close, be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the FY05 Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel PV Promotion Selection Board, and if recommended for promotion by the SRB,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03355

    Original file (BC-2003-03355.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Regarding the timeliness issue, the applicant argues that the DD Form 149 states the relevant date for submitting a BCMR application is within three years of “…the date of discovery of the alleged error occurred.” He believes he is inside the three-year window as he received notification of his erroneous DOR on 1 October 2000 and signed his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03165

    Original file (BC-2002-03165.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. James W. Russell III, and Mrs. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, considered this application on 26 March 2003. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPB, dtd 22 Nov 02, w/atch AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01058

    Original file (BC-2003-01058.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to a system failure to notify his wing of his promotion eligibility, a Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) was not staffed and forwarded to ARPC prior to the 20 Dec 02 deadline. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion consideration by the FY04 PV board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00184

    Original file (BC-2006-00184.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. ARPC/DPB recommends approval for the applicant to accept the promotion to the grade of major on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL), with a DOR of 2 April 1998. On 2 April 1998, he was tendered and accepted an appointment as a major, Reserve of the Air Force, with a date of rank and effective date of 2 April 1998, and placed on the Reserve Active Status List in the grade of major rather than in the grade of captain. On 2 April 1998, he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003211

    Original file (0003211.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, we recommend her records, to include the MSM, be evaluated by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the FY00 board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Meritorious Service Medal awarded for the period 6 November 1996 through 30 November 1998, be considered for promotion to the Reserve grade of major by Special Review Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01688

    Original file (BC-2004-01688.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 624 RSG commander provides a supporting statement confirming she did submit the applicant for promotion but discovered, after the board results were released, that the package was never forwarded from 624 RSG/DPM to HQ ARPC. The applicant was date-of-rank (DOR) eligible for consideration by the FY05 Major PV selection board, but his name did not appear on the list of officers considered by this board. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-01688 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02654

    Original file (BC-2004-02654.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 17 Sep 04 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02654 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03392

    Original file (BC-2002-03392.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After reviewing the comments provided by the Air Force, we are persuaded that the OPR closing 9 May 2001 should have been in his records at the time the FY03 board convened. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Officer Performance Report for the period 10 May 2000 through 9 May 2001, be considered for promotion to the grade of...