RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02669
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His Joint Service Achievement Medal 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (JSAM
1OLC) citation be added to his records.
2. The board discrepancy report be removed from his records.
3. His duty titles on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected.
4. The 21 July 1993 duty history entry be deleted since it duplicates
the 1 July 1993 entry.
5. He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel
by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1999 (CY99B)
lieutenant colonel board.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His Joint Service Achievement Medal 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (JSAM 1OLC)
citation was missing from official records when considered for
promotion to lieutenant colonel.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of the JSAM 1OLC
citation and OPRs reflecting correct duty titles.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the
grade of major.
Applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade
of lieutenant colonel by the CY99B central selection board.
OPR profile since 1991, follows:
PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL
31 May 91 Meets Standards (MS)
31 May 92 MS
31 May 93 MS
31 May 94 MS
31 May 95 MS
31 May 96 MS
12 Dec 96 MS
12 Dec 97 MS
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the
application and states that while it may be argued that the missing
decoration and erroneous duty history entries were factors in the
applicant’s nonselection, they contend that they did not negatively
impact his promotion opportunity. Central boards evaluate the entire
OSR (including the promotion recommendation form, OPRs, officer
effectiveness reports, training reports, letters of evaluation,
decorations, and OSB), assessing whole person factors such as job
performance, professional qualities, depth and breadth of experience,
leadership, and academic and professional military education. Even
though the duty history entries are administratively incorrect, they
do not believe they had an adverse affect on the applicant’s promotion
opportunity, as the correct data was available for the board’s review
in his evaluation reports and as evidenced by his selection by the
CY95A board. They are not convinced the missing decoration citation
and erroneous duty histories contributed to the applicant’s
nonselection. Therefore, they recommend denial of applicant’s
request.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 Nov 00, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. While the majority of
the Board notes that applicant’s records contain several minor
administrative errors, the majority of the Board does not believe that
these errors negatively impacted his promotion opportunity for
selection by the CY99B board. In this respect, the majority of the
Board notes that his correct duty history was reflected on his
performance reports and the Board members were aware that he had
received the Joint Service Achievement Medal. The majority of the
Board notes that selection board members review the individual’s
entire record and believes that the errors in his records were
harmless. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends denial of
the relief requested. It appears that the errors in his duty history
can be corrected administratively.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 27 February 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Mr. Daniel F. Wenker, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the application.
Mr. Michael V. Barbino voted to correct the records but does not
desire to submit a Minority Report. The following documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Sep 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPA, dated 25 Oct 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 3 Nov 00.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-02669
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members. A majority found that applicant
had not provided substantial evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied. I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.
Please advise the applicant accordingly.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Her most recent assignment and duty title of Chief, Product Line Division, at Hanscom AFB, MA, effective 26 November 1999, be updated on the officer selection brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY99B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board; 2. In support, the applicant provided copies of the OSB dated 24 November 1999; a Memorandum for Record--Board Discrepancy Report for Board PO599B, dated 19 November 1999; the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 October 1999; the order, citation and...
The citation accompanying the MSM 1OLC was missing from the applicant’s Officer’s Selection Record (OSR) when he was considered for promotion by the CY99B board, which convened on 30 November 1999, and still is not filed in his record. In this respect, after thoroughly reviewing the complete case file, a majority of the Board noted that the Air Force has indicated that the applicant's Officer Selection Record (OSR) did not contain the citation accompanying the award of the MSM 1st OLC for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00890
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1999B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a detailed response and additional documentary evidence which are attached...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The DAFSC with an effective date of 24 Aug 95, and the aeronautical/flying data on his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) were in error. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Assignments, AFPC/DPAIS1, reviewed this application and indicated that the applicant’s DAFSC of “W12B1Y” was consistent with the OPR on file. ...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 October 2000, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01169 INDEX NUMBER:131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting that the command level for his current duty assignment on his officer selection brief (OSB) be corrected from W/B (wing/base) to CMHQ (major command headquarters) and that he be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection...
For his 9 Oct 92 duty entry, "A" is correct and there should be a subsequent entry effective 31 Oct 93 to reflect a change from "A" to "C" (see Exhibit C) AFPC/DPPP recommends denial of the applicant's request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Duty Air Force Specialty Code, effective 6 October 1992, be changed to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02097
The decoration was awarded to the applicant by Special Order GJ-091, dated 30 Jun 03, which was after the CY02C board. Neither the citation nor the special order for this award correctly identifies the JSAM as the second, or 1OLC, award. Accordingly, we do not recommend SSB consideration for the CY02C board with this decoration on file, as it did not exist at the time of that board, although we do suggest the applicant have the special order and citation for the JSAM amended through...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The 16th Operations Support Squadron (OSS) completed a 161-day OPR reflecting his current duty, Operations Officer, early in order to be signed and faxed to the promotion board in time for inclusion in his records. The Editor also states that the rater did have full intent for the contested report to meet the board. HENRY ROMO, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-01203 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice warranting corrective action regarding the “Assistant Staff Judge Advocate” entry, with an effective date of 1 Jan 92, and the Command Level entry with an effective date of 27 Jul 98, in the Assignment History Section of the applicant’s OSB. Concerning the applicant’s requests that her CY99B OSB be amended in the Assignment History Section by removing the “Assistant Staff Judge...