RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO.: 99-02499
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
The applicant requests her separation code and the authority be changed.
The applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Pursuant to the applicant's request, on 5 Apr 2000, HQ AFPC/DPPRRB
administratively corrected the applicant's DD Form 214 to show award of the
Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon and completion of the following
training; Medical Service Apprentice and Apprentice Phase III, Equal
Opportunity Roles and Responsibilities, Asthma Emergency Treatment and Long
Term Control, Account Customer Care, and EMT Refresher Course. The
applicant's date entered active duty as shown on her DD Form 214 coincides
with the date on her DD Form 4 Enlistment/Reenlistment Document. DFAS-
DE/FYCC indicates that DFAS-DE Form
0-641, Statement of Military Pay Account, shows the applicant received a
lump sum leave (LSL) reimbursement of $1,111.66 for 31 accrued leave days
upon her separation. However, the applicant's DD Form 214 needs to be
corrected to indicate she was paid the 31 days of leave.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided
advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied
(Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for
review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory
opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been
rebutted by applicant/counsel. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed,
or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the
existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Ms. Peggy E. Gordon and Ms.
Dorothy P. Loeb, considered this application on 12 September 2000, in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and the
governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
TERRY A. YONKERS
Pane Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. AFBCMR Letter Forwarding Advisory Opinions
Applicant's The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E. IRVINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS- DE / FYCC MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ATTN: AFBCMR SUBJECT: Application for...
I " AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' JUL 2 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be paid for accrued leave not verified on his DD Form 214. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant claims that he did not take this leave and did not receive payment...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending that the disability severance pay amounts be verified through financial channels and the remarks section of the DD Form 214 be corrected, if appropriate (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
Based on the information provided, DFAS-DE/FYCC finds there has not been an error or an injustice and recommended the applicant’s request be denied (Exhibit D). Inasmuch as the applicant is a civil service employee working in the same organization, performing similar duties, as he did while on active duty, we are of the opinion that the Government has received no less benefit now that he is a civilian than if he stayed on active duty. TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-03192 MEMORANDUM...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Defense Finance and Accounting Service off ice evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). requested .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03198 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for injury sustained in . A complete copy of the advisory opinion is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.