Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102077
Original file (0102077.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-02077
            INDEX CODE:   128.08

      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN   HEARING DESIRED: No

Applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from  Active
Duty (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect the actual amount  of  disability
severance  pay  he  received  when  he  was  released  from   active   duty.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and  provided
an advisory opinion to the Board recommending that the disability  severance
pay amounts be verified through financial channels and the  remarks  section
of the DD Form 214 be corrected, if appropriate (Exhibit C).   The  advisory
opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit  D).
 The Defense  Finance  and  Accounting  Service-Denver  Center  advised  the
applicant that his DD Form 214  was  corrected  to  accurately  reflect  the
amount of severance pay he was paid, based on  a  maximum  of  12  years  of
service (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no  response  has  been  received  by
this office.

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the  available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or  injustice  to
warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated  in  the  advisory
opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been
rebutted by applicant.  Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find  no  basis  to  disturb  the
existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The  Board  staff  is  directed  to  inform  applicant  of  this   decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will  only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new  relevant  evidence  which  was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.

Members of the Board Mr. Terry A.  Yonkers,  Mr.  Michael  V.  Barbino,  Mr.
Michael K. Gallogy considered this  application  on  November  28,  2001  in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force  Instruction  36-2603,  and  the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.




                       TERRY A. YONKERS
                       Panel Chair

Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  SAF/MRBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E.  Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 15 Oct 2001

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100922

    Original file (0100922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101978

    Original file (0101978.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102305

    Original file (0102305.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101657

    Original file (0101657.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101985

    Original file (0101985.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102534

    Original file (0102534.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant on 15 November 2001 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102261

    Original file (0102261.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 November 1999, a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) convened and based on the diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia, definite social and industrial adaptability impairment, DVA Diagnostic Code 9412, recommended the applicant be retained on the TDRL with a 30% compensable disability rating. On 25 May 2001, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Board (SAFPB) agreed that the medical evidence indicated that the applicant’s condition was permanent, relatively stable on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9901116

    Original file (9901116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102078

    Original file (0102078.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, we recommend that her records be corrected as indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 29 September 1998, she executed an SGLI Form 8714, Application for Veterans’ Group Life Insurance (VGLI), effective 1 May 1999. TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-02078 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002381

    Original file (0002381.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.