RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01182
INDEX CODE 131.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records not show that she was twice nonselected for promotion to
the grade of major.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was not in the active Reserves or on active duty and therefore not
eligible for promotion. She plans to apply for active duty status and
cannot because of this error.
Her complete submission is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the official documents
provided by the applicant at Exhibit B and in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force Reserves at Exhibit C.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
AIR FORCE RESERVE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPP, reviewed
the application and states that the applicant should have been
assigned to Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) on 25 Mar 95,
which would have rendered her ineligible to meet the Fiscal Year 1996
(FY96) Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Major Selection Board. The
Director recommends that the applicant should be removed from the FY96
nonselect list, but not the FY95 nonselect list.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE RESERVE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15
Oct 99, for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant partial
relief. It appears that the applicant was appropriately considered,
but not selected, by the FY95 board. As she has provided no evidence
that this nonselection was in error, we find no compelling basis upon
which to void this nonselection. However, the Reserves have advised
that the applicant should have been assigned to ISLRS on 25 Mar 95,
which means she was ineligible to meet the FY96 board and should not
have been considered by that board. It would seem that this second
nonselection is in error and should be removed. Since the applicant
has not rebutted the Reserves’ evaluation, we presume she does not
take exception to it. Therefore, we agree with the partial relief
suggested by HQ ARPC/DPP and recommend the applicant's records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. She was assigned to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section
effective 25 March 1995.
b. She was not considered for promotion to the grade of major
by the Fiscal Year 1996 Reserve of the Air Force Major Selection
Board.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 22 February 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member
Ms. Marcia Jane Bachman, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Apr 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 30 Sep 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Oct 99.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-01182
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. She was assigned to the Inactive Status List Reserve
Section effective 25 March 1995.
b. She was not considered for promotion to the grade of
major by the Fiscal Year 1996 Reserve of the Air Force Major Selection
Board.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03257
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-00788
Of the 25 selected, 14 had not completed the appropriate level of PME, the FY94 board considered 48 members and selected 43 for promotion. Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings for Major XXX, dated 28 May 96. BENEDICT A. KAUSAL IV Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00788 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it...
Of the 25 selected, 14 had not completed the appropriate level of PME, the FY94 board considered 48 members and selected 43 for promotion. Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings for Major W---, dated 28 May 96. BENEDICT A. KAUSAL IV Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00788 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it...
Of the 25 selected, 14 had not completed the appropriate level of PME, the FY94 board considered 48 members and selected 43 for promotion. 111 Major W---Is case, the Commander, HQ ARPC, stated that, due to significantly lower overall selection rates on the FY96 ResAF board when compared to previous years and ar, apparent correlation between being determined "fully qualified" for promotion 2nd completing PME, it was possible that members of the FY96 ResAF board may not have followed the...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9601894A.doc
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00766 INDEX NUMBER: 131.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His two nonselections to the grade of captain by the Air Force Reserve Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 and FY97 Line and Nonline Captains Promotion Boards be set aside and he be allowed to enter the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02687
Her TFCSD is 8 May 82 and her MSD was computed as 1 Jun 2010 based on the first day of the following month in which she completed 28 years of commissioned service. Even though she did not participate in a unit or individual Reserve program for 3 years and 11 months from 22 Oct 92 to 18 Sep 96, that time still accounts for her TFCSD of 8 May 82 and cannot be adjusted because she did not participate. Had she selected the SSB, she would also have been transferred to the NNRPS on 22 Oct 92 as...
He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of 20 years for retirement. The applicant notes that the policy at the time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty. However, should the Board elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s record...