RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-00242
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour
officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of
20 years for retirement.
2. He receive credits for pay and points toward retirement for the time
lost due to his involuntary reassignment from his Individual Mobilization
Augmentee (IMA) position.
3. His date of rank (DOR) and Promotion Service Date (PSD) for
lieutenant colonel be adjusted to 11 April 1992.
4. His Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) be adjusted for 4 years for the
time lost as an IMA and for tenure criteria (6 years).
5. He receive an Officer Performance Report for his last IMA assignment
to the 12th Services Squadron, Randolph AFB.
6. He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), or higher award,
for his involuntary reassignment and Air Force Reserve (AFRes) retirement.
7. He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by a Special
Review Board with fair, timely, and adequate lieutenant colonel OPRs.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His most recent OPR was not reviewed by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93) AFRes
Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Board.
His last two OPRs were not reviewed by the FY94 AFRes Colonel Overall
Vacancy Selection Board.
The OPR rendered for the period 1 March 1990 through 19 December 1990 was
written with prejudice.
He was promised that he would be awarded an MSM or higher award, upon his
involuntary Reserve retirement; however, he was not.
The applicant states that after selected to serve a 4-year statutory tour,
he was involuntarily separated. The applicant notes that the policy at the
time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be
continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12
to 14 years of active duty.
The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 9 February 1983, the applicant was ordered to extended active duty in
accordance with 10 USC 265 (statutory tour) for the period 1 March 1983 to
28 February 1987.
On 1 January 1987, the applicant’s statutory tour was extended from 28
February 1987 to 28 February 1991.
The applicant was promoted to the Reserve grade of lieutenant colonel with
date of rank (DOR) of 12 June 1988.
On 6 February 1991, the applicant’s statutory tour was extended from 28
February 1991 to 29 February 1992.
On 10 April 1992, the applicant was released from active duty under the
provision of AFR 36-12 (Involuntary Release: Disapproval of request for
extension of tour).
The applicant was considered but not selected for promotion to the Reserve
grade of colonel by the FY92, FY93 and FY94 Air Force Reserve Colonel
Overall Vacancy Selection Boards.
On 5 April 1994, the applicant was notified that he was identified as
meeting the criteria of the Line Lieutenant Colonel Tenure Program, having
at least 20 satisfactory service years for Reserve retirement with the last
eight years in an Air Force Reserve component and six or more years time-in-
grade.
On 30 September 1994, the applicant was reassigned to the Inactive Status
List Reserve Section (ISLRS) after he was identified as meeting the
criteria for the Lieutenant Colonel Tenure Program, despite a request for a
waiver submitted by the 12th Services Squadron Commander.
Based on the applicant’s Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TAFCSD)
of 12 June 1967, his Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) was established as 11
July 1995.
On 11 July 1995, the applicant was placed on the Retired Reserve List and
will be eligible for retired pay under the provisions of 10 USC 1331 at age
60 (11 April 2004).
A resume of applicant’s performance profile, since 1987, follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
28 Feb 87 1-1-1
29 Feb 88 1-1-1
28 Feb 90 Meets Standards (MS)
* 19 Dec 90 MS
# 20 Sep 92 w/LOE MS
## 4 Jul 93 w/LOEs MS
* Contested report.
# Top report reviewed by the FY93 board.
## Top report reviewed by the FY94 board.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel, ARPC/DPZ, reviewed this application and
recommends favorable consideration of the applicant’s request for removal
of the break in service caused by his involuntary reassignment from the
Selected Reserve to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) and
consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel by an SRB for the FY95
Air Force Reserve Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Board.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
The Deputy Director of Personnel, AF/REP, reviewed this application and
states that they believe the action taken on the applicant was fair and
based on the needs of the Reserves at that time. However, should the Board
elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s
record be changed to reflect completion of the requested 2 years and 3
months of active service; thereby, qualifying him for retirement with
immediate annuity without having to serve the additional time. They
believe that returning him into the Statutory Tour Program would serve no
useful purpose.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that he was
unjustly and unfairly targeted by a commander who had only arrived in
August 1991 and did not consider his past service at ARPC in various
positions, his extension of his tour during Operation Desert Storm, nor the
AFRes unwritten policy for statutory tour officers who were continued
beyond a second tour.
The applicant states the relief suggested by AF/REP overlooks the fact that
he should have been retired with 20 years active duty in May 1995 and
possibly at a higher grade (O-6).
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the selecting
official for his final statutory tour position who indicates that AFRes had
an unwritten policy whereby an officer could expect to be retained in the
“265” program (though not necessarily in the same position) until
qualifying for a 20 year active duty retirement if that officer was
selected for a second or continuation tour upon completion of the original
tour.
The applicant’s complete responses are attached at Exhibits F and G.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice warranting applicant’s continuation on
active duty until reaching 20 years of active service to qualify for
retirement. The applicant contends that at the time he was renewed for a
second tour, the policy was that a statutory officer with an excellent
record of performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty would be continued
on active duty to complete 20 years of service. However, the Deputy
Director of Personnel, Office of the Air Force Reserve (AF/REP) has
indicated that the Air Force Reserve had no such retention policy. On the
other hand, we have a statement from the former Vice Commander of Air Force
Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC/CV) who was the selecting official for
statutory tour positions at ARPC. This individual indicates that based on
expressed concern about how to attract and retain officers in the statutory
tour program, the Assistance Chief of Air Force Reserve announced an
unwritten policy whereby statutory tour officers could expect to be
retained until qualifying for 20-year active duty retirement. In view of
this statement we believe the applicant’s records should be corrected to
reflect that he was not released from active duty on 10 April 1992, but was
continued on active duty until obtaining 20 years of active duty service
and retired in the grade of major. We note that in order to retire in a
grade higher than major, an individual must have served on active duty in
that grade for a period of three years unless eligible for a waiver of one
year. We also note that the applicant’s reassignment to ISLRS under the
Lieutenant Colonel Tenure Program was in error and unjust; however, the
retirement in the grade of major at the 20-year point will render this
issue moot. In this regard, we have obtained a statement from the
applicant indicating that he is aware that he will be retired from active
duty in the grade of major in 1995, with active duty pay and benefits
retroactive to 1992, and he concurs with the Board’s recommendation.
Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
4. In view of our above determination that the applicant should be
retroactively reinstated to active duty in 1992 and retired in 1995, the
remainder of his requests are moot.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not released from active duty on 10 April 1992, but on
that date he was continued on extended active duty in accordance with 10
USC 265 and assigned Permanent Change of Station to his home of record
pending further orders.
b. On 1 June 1994, he applied for voluntary retirement, effective
1 June 1995, and his request was approved by competent authority.
c. On 31 May 1995, he was released from active duty and on 1 June
1995, he was retired for length of service in the grade of major.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 November 1998 and 18 February 1999, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond. , Member
Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Member
Mr. Phillip E. Horton, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Jan 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPZ, dated 14 Apr 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AF/REP, dated 22 Aug 97.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Nov 97.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Dec 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Jul 98.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Feb 99, w/atch.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 97-00242
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not released from active duty on 10 April 1992, but on
that date he was continued on extended active duty in accordance with 10
USC 265 and assigned Permanent Change of Station to his home of record
pending further orders.
b. On 1 June 1994, he applied for voluntary retirement, effective
1 June 1995, and his request was approved by competent authority.
c. On 31 May 1995, he was released from active duty and on 1 June
1995, he was retired for length of service in the grade of major.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-00242
He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of 20 years for retirement. The applicant notes that the policy at the time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty. However, should the Board elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s record...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9601894A.doc
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1996-01804-3
Counsel submitted statements (and other attachments) from senior officers familiar with the applicant’s career who essentially contended the applicant’s record was so strong he would have been promoted if his record had been correct when first considered by the central selection boards. Statements were provided from three individuals (two retired brigadier generals, and a retired colonel), who indicated they were in the applicant’s chain of command and endorsed his direct promotion based on...
DR noted that at the time the applicant met the FY94 Reserve of the Air Force Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, his O S F included a Directed by HAF report for 2 AFBCMR 95-02481 the period 29 Oct 92 through 18 Mar 93. If a completed copy of the OPR is accepted for file, it is further recommended that his record be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board; that his record be evaluated in...
He contends his nonselections for promotion should be set aside on the basis that the Central Reserve Officer Promotion Act (ROPA) Boards were conducted in violation of statute and Air Force directives. As a result of an earlier application to the AFBCMR, an SRB was directed but the applicant was not recommended for selection for promotion by that SRB. We note the applicant cites an AFBCMR case wherein the Board recommended direct promotion.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02894A
He contends his nonselections for promotion should be set aside on the basis that the Central Reserve Officer Promotion Act (ROPA) Boards were conducted in violation of statute and Air Force directives. As a result of an earlier application to the AFBCMR, an SRB was directed but the applicant was not recommended for selection for promotion by that SRB. We note the applicant cites an AFBCMR case wherein the Board recommended direct promotion.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that it was evident no review of the FY93 0-6 board results took place and the party line of, “the Board uses the whole person concept to make selections” was the basis and mainstay for the denial. It appears the applicant is requesting this Board to...
On 30 Sep 95, he was assigned to the Retired Reserve Section in the grade of E-7 and placed on the Air Force Reserve Retired List, awaiting pay at age 60. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel, HQ AFRC/DPM, has determined from their evaluation of the applicant’s case that he is not eligible for Reserve Transition Assistance Program (RTAP) benefits. A copy of his response is appended at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00591
On 30 Sep 95, he was assigned to the Retired Reserve Section in the grade of E-7 and placed on the Air Force Reserve Retired List, awaiting pay at age 60. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel, HQ AFRC/DPM, has determined from their evaluation of the applicant’s case that he is not eligible for Reserve Transition Assistance Program (RTAP) benefits. A copy of his response is appended at Exhibit...