RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00994
INDEX CODES: A67.10. 110.02
131.09
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that her general discharge be upgraded to
honorable, her narrative reason for separation be changed, and that
her rank of E-3 be restored. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the
applicant’s request for upgrade of her discharge and change of reason
for her separation (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request that her general
discharge be upgraded to honorable and her narrative reason for
separation be changed and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence
of record and has not been rebutted by applicant. Regarding her
request that her rank of E-3 be restored, no evidence has been
presented which has shown to our satisfaction that the applicant’s
rank at the time of her separation was erroneous. In view of the
above, and in the absence of persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed,
or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Ms. Patricia D. Vestal,
and Mr. John E. Pettit considered this application
on 29 Feb 00 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's requests on 25 Feb 00. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
On 23 October 1998, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting that her general discharge be upgraded to honorable. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is at Exhibit C. The AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicant’s discharge to general on 12 September 1978. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the AFDRB brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and their basis for not upgrading the discharge to honorable has not been rebutted by applicant.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The 'decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel s response to the AFDRB Brief is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 12 May 1999 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request on 17 July 1998. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 0 7 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general discharge be upgraded to honorable so that she will be eligible to pursue her education under the Montgomery GI Bill. We therefore recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit C. AFDRB Brief.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 18 September 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.