RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02156
INDEX CODE: 110
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING: NO
The applicant requests that his general discharge be changed to
honorable. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s
request on 17 July 1998. In accordance with policy, the application
was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C).
The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and
have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record. Accordingly, applicant's
request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Mr. Richard A. Peterson,
and Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler considered this application on 2 February
1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
MICHAEL P. HIGGINS
Panel Chairman
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant ' s request on 21 Jul 98 (Exhibit C ) . forwarded to this Board After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Loeb, Member, considered this application on 21 January 1999 in accordance with the Drovisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the Exhibits : A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 31 March 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). 4 After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: . In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Brief D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S JUL 0 6 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military...
Appiicantls submission is at Exhibit A. * The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant Is request that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to either general (under honorable conditions) or honorable on 26 September 1 9 8 5 (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 14 Dec 98. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 3 September 1999. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 25 May 2000. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The AFDRB brief and advisory opinion were forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit E).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request for upgrade of his general discharge and to change his RE code on 30 August 1999 (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request concerning the RE code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB and the advisory opinion were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E).
On 28 Oct 92, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant I s request for upgrade of his UOTHC discharge to honorable (Exhibit B). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.