RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02011
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable
discharge. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request
on 18 September 1998. In accordance with policy, the application was
forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The AFDRB
brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit
D).) As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice
to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the AFDRB
brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the
existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which
was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. Walter J. Hosey, and Mr.
Richard A. Peterson considered this application on 10 February 1999, in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 14 Dec 98. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicant’s discharge to general on 12 September 1978. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the AFDRB brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and their basis for not upgrading the discharge to honorable has not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 25 May 2000. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The AFDRB brief and advisory opinion were forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit E).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant ' s request on 15 April 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The 'decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel s response to the AFDRB Brief is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). AFBCMR (Processing) RALPH J. PRETE EXAMINER AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DATE:________________________ MEMBERS PRESENT: , Panel Chair , Member , Member TYPE OF MEETING:...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) request on 9 March 1950 (Exhibit B). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) package shows that the applicant requested a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. _________________________________________________________________ The following...