Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0001075
Original file (0001075.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  00-01075
            INDEX CODE:  112.02

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect that he enlisted in the Air  Force
Reserve in the grade of airman first class (E-3)  rather  than  airman
basic (E-1).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Before he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve, he  understood  that  his
enlistment grade would be E-3 based on his college credits.   When  it
came time for him to enlist, he could not produce his transcripts  due
to a financial hold being placed on his records.  He could not pay the
bill prior to his scheduled enlistment date.  Therefore, he could  not
produce the transcripts to document his education.  Had he  understood
the implications of not having the transcripts  at  the  time  of  his
enlistment, he would have taken steps to get them before enlisting  as
an E-1.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided copies of his college
transcript, and enlistment and separation documents.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Available documentation indicates that the applicant enlisted  in  the
Air Force Reserve on 30 Jun 99 in the grade of E-1 for a period of six
years.

Information extracted from the Personnel Data System  (PDS)  indicates
that the applicant is currently serving in the Air  Force  Reserve  in
the grade of airman first class, having been promoted to that grade on
1 Sep 00.

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letters  prepared  by  the  appropriate  offices  of  the  Air  Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record  of
Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Operations Branch, HQ AFRC/RSOO,  reviewed  this  application  and
indicated that, in accordance with Air Force Reserve Command accession
policy, the applicant enlisted in the proper rank (E-1);  however,  he
is eligible for the rank of senior airman (E-4)  following  completion
of  technical  school  (with  wing  commander’s   endorsement).    The
applicant  successfully  earned  over  60 semester  hours  of  college
credits prior to enlistment.  Had he provided the transcripts prior to
enlistment, the E-4 provision would have been noted in his contract.

According  to  HQ  AFRC/RSOO,  the  applicant  was  properly   briefed
concerning  his  responsibility  to  provide  transcripts   prior   to
enlistment (for possible advanced  rank)  and  he  elected  to  enlist
without doing so.

A complete copy of the HQ AFRC/RSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  23
Jun 00 for review and response.  As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of
the available evidence, we are not persuaded that corrective action is
warranted regarding  the  applicant’s  request  that  his  records  be
corrected to reflect that he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve in  the
grade of E-3 rather than E-1.  In  this  respect,  we  note  that  the
applicant initialed on DD Form 1966/3, Record of Military Processing -
Armed Forces of the United States,  that  he  understood  that  if  he
presented official college transcripts prior  to  his  enlistment,  he
might be eligible for enlistment in a higher grade.  He also initialed
that he elected to enlist in the grade of E-1 prior to the receipt  of
his  official  college  transcripts,  and,  that  he  understood   the
presentation of these documents subsequent to his enlistment would not
be a basis for the award of  an  increase  in  his  enlistment  grade.
However, notwithstanding the above,  we note  the  office  of  primary
responsibility (OPR) has advised that the applicant  is  now  eligible
for the grade of E-4 following of his completion of  technical  school
and has recommended that he be awarded the rank of  E-4,  effective  1
Mar 00, with the wing commander’s endorsement.  According to the  OPR,
had the applicant provided his transcripts prior  to  his  enlistment,
the E-4 provision would have been noted in  his  contract.   While  we
find no evidence which would lead us to believe that  the  applicant’s
rank at the time of his enlistment was erroneous, we are  inclined  to
accept the OPR’s recommendation regarding the applicant’s  advancement
to the rank of E-4.  Accordingly, we recommend  that  the  applicant’s
records be corrected as indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he  was  promoted  to
the grade of senior airman (E-4), Air  Force  Reserve,  effective  and
with date of rank of 1 Mar 00.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 11 Oct 00, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
      Mr. Mike Novel, Member
      Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Apr 00, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFRC/RSOO, dated 30 May 00.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 23 Jun 00.




                                   CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                   Panel Chair



AFBCMR 00-01075




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of  the  Department  of  the  Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that he was promoted  to  the
grade of senior airman (E-4), Air Force Reserve,  effective  and  with
date of rank of 1 Mar 00, with wing commander’s endorsement.






    JOE G. LINEBERGER

    Director

    Air Force Review Boards Agency



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04420

    Original file (BC-2010-04420.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/RSOO recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01558

    Original file (BC-2006-01558.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Military Personnel Database (MilPDS) indicates the applicant is a member of the Air Force Reserve currently serving in the grade of airman first class (E-3) with a date of rank of 15 Dec 2005. RSOO notes she was processed as a Prior Service applicant, active duty Air Force from 15 September 1987 to 16 May 1988, rank at time of separation, E-2, Re Code: 3A, SPN/SPN: MDF, Character of Service: Honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 June 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04741

    Original file (BC-2012-04741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04741 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he enlisted in the grade of airman first class (E-3), instead of airman basic (E-1). Under the provisions of AFRCI 36-2001, Air Force Reserve Recruiting Procedures, Table 5.1, Note 5: Documents presented after...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00052

    Original file (BC-2012-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force Reserve Command office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03807

    Original file (BC-2009-03807.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 08, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserves in the grade of airman basic (E-1). Prior service pay grade determination is based on AFRCI 36-2001, Chapter 6, Table 6.2, rule 2…when applicant last served in enlisted status with any U.S. Armed Forces, grade awarded will be “permanent enlisted grade held at time of latest discharge.” The complete A1K evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03634

    Original file (BC-2010-03634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RSOO states they have no record the applicant provided the required transcripts in time for a rank adjustment. The complete RSOO evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0001282

    Original file (0001282.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant has prior enlisted service in the Regular Air Force (15 Nov 76-14 Sep 84); a break in service (15 Sep 84 - 10 Jan 85); and, enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 11 Jan 85. RSOO indicated that since the applicant admitted to using cocaine and having a civil conviction for dealing in cocaine, he is permanently disqualified for enlistment in the Air Force Reserve, regardless of his reenlistment...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02588

    Original file (BC-2003-02588.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/DPZ indicates that if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the record should be corrected to show the applicant’s DOR to airman as 31 May 2001 (his initial date of enlistment into the Air Force Reserve). The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 September 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01952

    Original file (BC-2007-01952.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/RSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Neither does the record reveal nor has the applicant provided any evidence indicating that his pay grade was E-4 at the time of his enlistment in the Air Force Reserve on 7 April 2007. While Army records provided by the applicant indicate he was eligible for promotion to specialist (E-4) effective 13 December 2006; his DD Form 214, which is used as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04974

    Original file (BC 2013 04974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an enlistment bonus for her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC)/7-skill level and she be awarded the rank of airman first class. The applicant initialed and signed the DD Form 1966 continuation sheet that states both “Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills” and “Enlisting with Stripes for:” sections were...