ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-00860
INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 27 Mar 92
through 26 Mar 93 be declared void and replaced with a reaccomplished
report covering the same period.
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 18 Sep 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see
Exhibit F).
On 6 Oct 98, the applicant provided a statement from the reviewer of
the contested report and requested the Board reconsider his
application (see Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the
additional statement provided by the reviewer of the report in
question, dated 17 Aug 98, we are persuaded that the omission of
information pertaining to applicant’s work on restructuring for Air
Combat Command and U.S. Atlantic Command (LANTCOM) was inadvertently
omitted during the writing of the original OPR. The reviewer states
that the applicant’s work on restructuring for Air Combat Command and
U.S. Atlantic Command eclipse all his other accomplishments and shows
a far greater impact than indicated on the contested OPR. In view of
these statements, we recommend the information relating to applicant’s
work on LANTCOM be added to the contested OPR. Furthermore, we
recommend he be given consideration for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar
Year 1993A (CY93A), CY94A, and CY96C Central Lieutenant Colonel
Boards.
2. We considered the reaccomplished report; however, while the
applicant and his support state the revised report contains more
accurate information describing the applicant’s duties, we note that
the evaluators signed the original report indicating it was accurate
when written and the proposed report does not resemble the original.
Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting applicant’s request
to replace the contested report with a reaccomplished report covering
the same period.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Field Grade OPR,
AF Form 707A, rendered for the period 27 Mar 92 through 26 Mar 93, be
corrected as indicated below:
a. Section II. Unit Mission Description. Add “(TTP)” after
“procedures” and before “The Combat.”
b. Section III. Job Description. 2. Key Duties, Tasks, and
Responsibilities: The following be added after “Air Combat Command”
and before “Directorate of Plans and Programs.”: “(ACC) and US
Atlantic Command (LANTCOM)”. and after “Air Combat Command” and before
“and Strategic Command” add “LANTCOM,”.
c. Section IV. Impact on Mission Accomplishment. The
following be added after “US-Argentinian relations.” And before “- His
in-depth review”: “- Hand-picked for SECDEF-directed LANTCOM
Implementation Working Group (LIWG)—spearheaded development of
guidelines for joint TTPs used by new command’s components to train
80% of DoD forces.”
d. Section VI. Rater Overall Assessment. The following be
added after “this project” and before “He identified,”: “He led the
ACC/LANTCOM transition team designing the command-to-command
relationships for ACC’s AF component role in the new Atlantic Command.
As part of the LIWG, he coordinated with Navy, Marine, and Army
counterparts to publish first ever LANTCOM TTP document.”
His corrected record be considered for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel by SSB for the CY93A, CY94A, and CY96C Central
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 5 May 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
Mr. Robert Zook, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. ROP, dated 14 Oct 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter fr applicant, dated 6 Oct 98, w/atchs.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01
AFBCMR 97-00860
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Field Grade
Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A, rendered for the period
27 March 1992 through 26 March 1993, be corrected as indicated below:
a. Section II. Unit Mission Description. Add “(TTP)”
after “procedures” and before “The Combat.”
b. Section III. Job Description. 2. Key Duties,
Tasks, and Responsibilities: The following be added after “Air Combat
Command” and before “Directorate of Plans and Programs.”: “(ACC) and
US Atlantic Command (LANTCOM)”. and after “Air Combat Command” and
before “and Strategic Command” add “LANTCOM,”.
c. Section IV. Impact on Mission Accomplishment. The
following be added after “US-Argentinian relations.” And before “- His
in-depth review”: “- Hand-picked for SECDEF-directed LANTCOM
Implementation Working Group (LIWG)—spearheaded development of
guidelines for joint TTPs used by new command’s components to train
80% of DoD forces.”
d. Section VI. Rater Overall Assessment. The following
be added after “this project” and before “He identified,”: “He led
the ACC/LANTCOM transition team designing the command-to-command
relationships for ACC’s AF component role in the new Atlantic Command.
As part of the LIWG, he coordinated with Navy, Marine, and Army
counterparts to publish first ever LANTCOM TTP document.”
His corrected record be considered for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar
Year 1993A (CY93A), CY94A, and CY96C Central Lieutenant Colonel
Selection Boards.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
On 6 Oct 98, the applicant provided a statement from the reviewer of the contested report and requested the Board reconsider his application (see Exhibit G). The reviewer states that the applicant’s work on restructuring for Air Combat Command and U.S. Atlantic Command eclipse all his other accomplishments and shows a far greater impact than indicated on the contested OPR. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 AFBCMR 97-00860 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
On , the applicant provided a statement from the reviewer of the contested report and requested the Board reconsider his application (see Exhibit G). The reviewer states that the applicant’s work on restructuring for Air Combat Command and U.S. Atlantic Command eclipse all his other accomplishments and shows a far greater impact than indicated on the contested OPR. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
On the contrary, the issue here is whether any error has occurred within an internal Air Force promotion recommendation procedure (unlike Sanders, this applicant has not proven the existence of any error requiring correction) , wherein the final promotion recommendation (DP, Promote, Do Not Promote) cannot exist without the concurrence of the officers who authored and approved it. The attached reaccomplished PRF, reflecting a promotion recommendation of IIDefinitely Promote (DP) , be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02277
If his request for retroactive promotion is denied and the Board directs consideration for promotion by Special Selection Board (SSB), applicant also requests that: 4. As a result of his selection for promotion to the grade of major, the AFBCMR further recommended approval of his request to be reinstated to active duty. If applicant would be selected to lieutenant colonel by an SSB, at that time his record would be scored against “benchmark” records and he would receive school candidacy if...
If his request for retroactive promotion is denied and the Board directs consideration for promotion by Special Selection Board (SSB), applicant also requests that: 4. As a result of his selection for promotion to the grade of major, the AFBCMR further recommended approval of his request to be reinstated to active duty. If applicant would be selected to lieutenant colonel by an SSB, at that time his record would be scored against “benchmark” records and he would receive school candidacy if...
Specifically, they note the statement “If the OER/OPR does not agree with the requested changes, a request must be submitted to correct the OER/OPR.” A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and states that the officer preselection brief (OPB) is sent to each eligible officer several months prior to a selection board. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02197
Specifically, they note the statement “If the OER/OPR does not agree with the requested changes, a request must be submitted to correct the OER/OPR.” A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and states that the officer preselection brief (OPB) is sent to each eligible officer several months prior to a selection board. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00189 (CASE 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. On 1 Nov 01, the Board...
- -obs, and recommended placed in A compiete copy of the evaluation 1s attached at Exhibit K O APPLICANT'S REVIEW OE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and has provided her response which is attached at Exhibit M. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Essentially applicant requests chat the contested Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 April 1996 bp removed and replaced with a reaccomplished report reflecting her grade as lieutenant colonel with no indication...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02455
The AF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Contrary to the evaluation’s assertion, his request is timely filed. Exhibit B. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02455 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A...