Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9700860A
Original file (9700860A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                                 ADDENDUM TO
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  97-00860
            INDEX CODE:  111.01, 131.01

            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  Yes


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 27 Mar 92
through 26 Mar 93 be declared void and replaced with a  reaccomplished
report covering the same period.

_________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 18 Sep 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see
Exhibit F).

On 6 Oct 98, the applicant provided a statement from the  reviewer  of
the  contested  report  and  requested  the   Board   reconsider   his
application (see Exhibit G).

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of probable error or  injustice.   After  reviewing  the
additional statement  provided  by  the  reviewer  of  the  report  in
question, dated 17 Aug 98, we  are  persuaded  that  the  omission  of
information pertaining to applicant’s work on  restructuring  for  Air
Combat Command and U.S. Atlantic Command (LANTCOM)  was  inadvertently
omitted during the writing of the original OPR.  The  reviewer  states
that the applicant’s work on restructuring for Air Combat Command  and
U.S. Atlantic Command eclipse all his other accomplishments and  shows
a far greater impact than indicated on the contested OPR.  In view  of
these statements, we recommend the information relating to applicant’s
work on LANTCOM be  added  to  the  contested  OPR.   Furthermore,  we
recommend he be given consideration for  promotion  to  the  grade  of
lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for  the  Calendar
Year 1993A  (CY93A),  CY94A,  and  CY96C  Central  Lieutenant  Colonel
Boards.

2.    We considered the  reaccomplished  report;  however,  while  the
applicant and his support  state  the  revised  report  contains  more
accurate information describing the applicant’s duties, we  note  that
the evaluators signed the original report indicating it  was  accurate
when written and the proposed report does not resemble  the  original.
Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting applicant’s  request
to replace the contested report with a reaccomplished report  covering
the same period.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Field Grade  OPR,
AF Form 707A, rendered for the period 27 Mar 92 through 26 Mar 93,  be
corrected as indicated below:

      a.    Section II.  Unit Mission Description.  Add “(TTP)”  after
“procedures” and before “The Combat.”

      b.    Section III.  Job Description.  2.  Key Duties, Tasks, and
Responsibilities:  The following be added after “Air  Combat  Command”
and before “Directorate  of  Plans  and  Programs.”:   “(ACC)  and  US
Atlantic Command (LANTCOM)”. and after “Air Combat Command” and before
“and Strategic Command” add “LANTCOM,”.

      c.     Section  IV.   Impact  on  Mission  Accomplishment.   The
following be added after “US-Argentinian relations.” And before “- His
in-depth  review”:   “-  Hand-picked   for   SECDEF-directed   LANTCOM
Implementation  Working  Group   (LIWG)—spearheaded   development   of
guidelines for joint TTPs used by new command’s  components  to  train
80% of DoD forces.”

      d.    Section VI.  Rater Overall Assessment.  The  following  be
added after “this project” and before “He identified,”:  “He  led  the
ACC/LANTCOM   transition   team   designing   the   command-to-command
relationships for ACC’s AF component role in the new Atlantic Command.
 As part of the LIWG, he  coordinated  with  Navy,  Marine,  and  Army
counterparts to publish first ever LANTCOM TTP document.”

His corrected record be considered  for  promotion  to  the  grade  of
lieutenant colonel by SSB for the  CY93A,  CY94A,  and  CY96C  Central
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 5 May 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                  Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
                  Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
              Mr. Robert Zook, Member


All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit F.  ROP, dated 14 Oct 97, w/atchs.
     Exhibit G.  Letter fr applicant, dated 6 Oct 98, w/atchs.




                                   CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                   Panel Chair


INDEX CODE:  111.01, 131.01

AFBCMR 97-00860




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the  recommendation  of  the  Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat  116),  it  is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of  the  Department  of  the  Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Field Grade
Officer Performance Report, AF Form  707A,  rendered  for  the  period
27 March 1992 through 26 March 1993, be corrected as indicated below:

            a.   Section II.  Unit Mission Description.   Add  “(TTP)”
after “procedures” and before “The Combat.”

            b.   Section  III.   Job  Description.   2.   Key  Duties,
Tasks, and Responsibilities:  The following be added after “Air Combat
Command” and before “Directorate of Plans and Programs.”:  “(ACC)  and
US Atlantic Command (LANTCOM)”. and after  “Air  Combat  Command”  and
before “and Strategic Command” add “LANTCOM,”.

            c.   Section IV.  Impact on Mission  Accomplishment.   The
following be added after “US-Argentinian relations.” And before “- His
in-depth  review”:   “-  Hand-picked   for   SECDEF-directed   LANTCOM
Implementation  Working  Group   (LIWG)—spearheaded   development   of
guidelines for joint TTPs used by new command’s  components  to  train
80% of DoD forces.”

            d.   Section VI.  Rater Overall Assessment.  The following
be added after “this project” and before “He  identified,”:   “He  led
the  ACC/LANTCOM  transition  team  designing  the  command-to-command
relationships for ACC’s AF component role in the new Atlantic Command.
 As part of the LIWG, he  coordinated  with  Navy,  Marine,  and  Army
counterparts to publish first ever LANTCOM TTP document.”

      His corrected record be considered for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for  the  Calendar
Year 1993A  (CY93A),  CY94A,  and  CY96C  Central  Lieutenant  Colonel
Selection Boards.







                                                            JOE     G.
LINEBERGER
                                                         Director
                                                           Air   Force
Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-00860A

    Original file (BC-1997-00860A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 Oct 98, the applicant provided a statement from the reviewer of the contested report and requested the Board reconsider his application (see Exhibit G). The reviewer states that the applicant’s work on restructuring for Air Combat Command and U.S. Atlantic Command eclipse all his other accomplishments and shows a far greater impact than indicated on the contested OPR. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 AFBCMR 97-00860 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9700860

    Original file (9700860.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On , the applicant provided a statement from the reviewer of the contested report and requested the Board reconsider his application (see Exhibit G). The reviewer states that the applicant’s work on restructuring for Air Combat Command and U.S. Atlantic Command eclipse all his other accomplishments and shows a far greater impact than indicated on the contested OPR. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9404904

    Original file (9404904.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the contrary, the issue here is whether any error has occurred within an internal Air Force promotion recommendation procedure (unlike Sanders, this applicant has not proven the existence of any error requiring correction) , wherein the final promotion recommendation (DP, Promote, Do Not Promote) cannot exist without the concurrence of the officers who authored and approved it. The attached reaccomplished PRF, reflecting a promotion recommendation of IIDefinitely Promote (DP) , be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02277

    Original file (BC-1996-02277.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    If his request for retroactive promotion is denied and the Board directs consideration for promotion by Special Selection Board (SSB), applicant also requests that: 4. As a result of his selection for promotion to the grade of major, the AFBCMR further recommended approval of his request to be reinstated to active duty. If applicant would be selected to lieutenant colonel by an SSB, at that time his record would be scored against “benchmark” records and he would receive school candidacy if...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9602277

    Original file (9602277.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    If his request for retroactive promotion is denied and the Board directs consideration for promotion by Special Selection Board (SSB), applicant also requests that: 4. As a result of his selection for promotion to the grade of major, the AFBCMR further recommended approval of his request to be reinstated to active duty. If applicant would be selected to lieutenant colonel by an SSB, at that time his record would be scored against “benchmark” records and he would receive school candidacy if...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9702197

    Original file (9702197.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, they note the statement “If the OER/OPR does not agree with the requested changes, a request must be submitted to correct the OER/OPR.” A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and states that the officer preselection brief (OPB) is sent to each eligible officer several months prior to a selection board. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02197

    Original file (BC-1997-02197.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, they note the statement “If the OER/OPR does not agree with the requested changes, a request must be submitted to correct the OER/OPR.” A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and states that the officer preselection brief (OPB) is sent to each eligible officer several months prior to a selection board. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00189

    Original file (BC-2004-00189.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00189 (CASE 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. On 1 Nov 01, the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9601357

    Original file (9601357.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    - -obs, and recommended placed in A compiete copy of the evaluation 1s attached at Exhibit K O APPLICANT'S REVIEW OE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and has provided her response which is attached at Exhibit M. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Essentially applicant requests chat the contested Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 April 1996 bp removed and replaced with a reaccomplished report reflecting her grade as lieutenant colonel with no indication...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02455

    Original file (BC-2004-02455.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Contrary to the evaluation’s assertion, his request is timely filed. Exhibit B. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02455 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A...