RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00738
INDEX NUMBER: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his 22 December 1983 general (under honorable
conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
On 9 August 1985, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)
considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting
upgrade of his discharge (see AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C).
On 12 August 1985, the Secretary of the Air Force, upon recommendation
of the Air Force Personnel Board, denied applicant’s request for a
change of his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code (Exhibit D).
On 15 May 1986, the AFBCMR considered and denied applicant’s request
that his RE Code be changed (see Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E).
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit F). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit G). Applicant's response
to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit H.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board, Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb,
and Mr. Joseph A. Roj, considered this application on 28 September
1999, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Hearing Record
D. SAF/MIPC Memorandum dtd 12 Aug 85
E. ROP, AFBCMR 85-03497
F. Advisory Opinion
G. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
h. Applicant's Response
On 7 July 1999, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting upgrade of his discharge to honorable (see AFBCMR Hearing Record at Exhibit C). A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Hearing Record D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Hearing Record
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02367
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Staff Judge Advocate’s statement concerning his appeal of an Article 15 he received on 17 Jan 85 made reference to another airman who was being discharged at the same time and did not pertain to him. On 26 Feb 85, the office of the Staff Judge Advocate found no errors or irregularities in the discharge case file and recommended that the applicant be furnished a general discharge. On 5 Jun 87, the...
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 16 June 1999. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-01620
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 80-03066 97-02285 INDEX CODES: A93.35, 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge and any and all records and or system(s) of records or information of the Department of the Air Force relating to his discharge be voided. The adverse decision of the Board of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-02689A
The applicant also provided additional documentation that he believes should be included in his selection records. AFPC/DPSOO's complete evaluation is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Feb 08, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
On 19 December 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s requests for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change of reason for discharge, and change of RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests for reinstatement of his former grade of senior airman and change of RE code and provided advisory opinions to the Board (Exhibit D). The AFDRB Hearing Record and advisory...
The LES for July 1985 indicates that he entered active duty on 12 Jun 85 with 4.5 days of accrued leave. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM reviewed applicant's request and recommends that his records be corrected as...