RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 99-00528
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to
honorable. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's
request on 3 February 1999. In accordance with policy, the
application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration
(Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions
stated in the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of
record and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Ms. Sophie A. Clark,
and Mr. Joseph A. Roj considered this application on 8 July 1999 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 16 June 1999. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-01620
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
On 7 July 1999, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting upgrade of his discharge to honorable (see AFBCMR Hearing Record at Exhibit C). A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Hearing Record D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Hearing Record
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 29 July 1998. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to .be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 29 July 1998. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to .be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and has not been rebutted by the applicant.
On 9 August 1985, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting upgrade of his discharge (see AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit F). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit H. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
On 19 December 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s requests for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change of reason for discharge, and change of RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests for reinstatement of his former grade of senior airman and change of RE code and provided advisory opinions to the Board (Exhibit D). The AFDRB Hearing Record and advisory...