RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00187
INDEX CODE: 134.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 125A, Record of
Administrative Training Action, dated 6 Oct 98 be removed from his
record.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like the AETC Form 125A removed from his records so that he
could reapply for Officer Training School (OTS).
He is a former UH-60 flight instructor and Chief Warrant Officer,
having completed over 9 years of service in the United States Army.
In 1997, he applied for a position as a helicopter pilot in the Air
Force. After being accepted by the Special Flying Programs Office, he
then applied to attend OTS and was accepted to attend class 99-02B,
beginning on 28 Sep 98. He simultaneously applied for the position of
Special Agent in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). After one
week in the OTS program, the FBI applicant coordinator informed him
that he could expect to attend the academy within a couple of months.
Due to time and availability constraints, he had to make a very
difficult decision, fast (USAF vs. FBI) - he chose the FBI.
Unfortunately, on 19 Dec 98, he received a letter from the FBI
rescinding his conditional appointment and that he would not be
attending the FBI Academy. After receiving this information, he
contacted the Special Flying Programs Office to explain the situation
and his intense desire to still serve as an Air Force officer. The
Helicopter Assignments Officer and the Special Flying Programs office
recommended approval of his accession waiver; however, it was
disapproved by the approval authority.
He is a good officer and his military background, education and
dedication to duty and country will prove to be valuable assets to the
Air Force if his request is granted.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement and
a copy of a letter from the FBI (Exhibit A).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was a member of the United States Army from 29 Nov 90
until his honorable discharge in the grade of chief warrant officer on
27 Sep 98. He was assigned the primary specialty code of 153DC (UH-60
Pilot). The applicant had completed 7 years, 9 months and 29 days of
active service at the time of his separation from the U.S. Army.
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff
sergeant (E-5) on 28 Sep 98 and was voluntarily ordered to extended
active duty (EAD) for a period of 120 days. He was assigned to
Officer Training School (OTS), Maxwell AFB, AL, to attend OTS Class
9902B, beginning 28 Sep 98, in AFSC 11H2E (helicopter pilot) for a
period of 13.5 weeks.
On 5 Oct 98, the applicant submitted a request for Self-Initiated
Elimination (SIE) from OTS. His request was approved by the 24th
Training Squadron commander on 7 Oct 98. On 7 Oct 98, the applicant
was honorably discharged from the Regular Air Force under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Failure to Complete Commissioning or
Warrant Program). He had completed a total of 10 days of active
service at the time of his discharge.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The commander, 24th Training Squadron, AETC 24TS/CC, stated that the
applicant left OTS at the earliest possible date to pursue other
interests. He clearly indicated on his Self-Initiated Elimination
(SIE) letter that he no longer wished to deal with the unique
challenges of military life. Selection to OTS is very competitive and
only two of ten qualified applicants are selected to attend Basic
Officer Training. The applicant voluntarily left OTS after only seven
training days. His actions prove he neither has the commitment, nor
dedication, to complete this challenging program. By Self-
Eliminating, he also took a training slot away from another qualified
applicant who could have completed OTS. The AETC 24TS/CC stands by
the 6 Oct 98 recommendation that the applicant “not be considered for
reinstatement into this course at a later date.” He strongly urges
the Board to deny the applicant’s request for removing the AETC Form
125A (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that he was
proud and excited to be a student at the Officer Training School and
was eagerly looking forward to the challenges, not only of OTS, but
also of becoming an Air Force officer. When he was notified (4 days
after he began OTS) of an impending FBI academy class date, his
decision became more difficult. After consulting with his spouse, and
some of his OTS flight mates, he made the decision to leave OTS for a
career with the FBI. This was, without a doubt, the most difficult
decision he has ever had to make, and is the one moment in his life’s
history that he would change, if he could.
When he wrote his memorandum for Self-Initiated Elimination (SIE), he
did not express himself in the manner he had hoped. While it is true
that a career with the FBI would allow him to spend more time with his
family, his intent was to illustrate the differences between the two
lifestyles. Statement three on his SIE request states that he fully
realizes that the SIE request may preclude him from obtaining further
training leading to a commission, it does not say that it will
“prohibit” future training or even a return to OTS.
He is a qualified and experienced military officer, aviator, and
flight instructor in the Blackhawk (H-60) helicopter. He was
originally brought into the Air Force by the Helicopter Assignments
Officer at the AFPC during their attempt to transfer qualified pilots
from the other services.
He has provided additional documents in support of his request, which
include a statement from the former Helicopter Assignments Officer
(Major Douglas G---). A complete copy of this response is appended at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. In this respect, we reviewed the
circumstances of this case and noted the statement from the Chief,
Special Flying Programs, who supports the applicant’s request and
believes “he would be a valuable, experienced and highly motivated
asset for the Air Force.” Taking into consideration the applicant’s
outstanding military record and the support from the individual in
charge of the Helicopter Pilot Interservice Transfer Program, we are
convinced that the applicant would be a valuable asset to the Air
Force and therefore should be provided another chance to serve the Air
Force. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s self-
initiated elimination request from the OTS program, with all
attachments, be removed from his record. We believe this correction
will render the applicant eligible to reapply for the OTS program as
he so indicated. In addition, we note that since the age requirement
for pilot and navigator training has been changed from 27½ to 30 years
of age, effective 1 October 1999, approval of an age waiver for the
applicant is unnecessary.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the AETC Form 125A,
Record of Administrative Training Action, approved on 7 October 1998,
with attachments, be declared void and removed from his military
record.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 13 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Cathlynn Sparks, Panel Chair
Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Member
Mr. George Franklin, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jan 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AU (AETC), 24TS/CC, dated 19 Mar 99,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 12 Apr 99.
Exhibit E. Letters from applicant, dated 14 Apr 99, w/atchs,
and 30 Apr 99, w/atch.
CATHLYNN SPARKS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-00187
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the AETC Form
125A, Record of Administrative Training Action, approved on 7 October
1998, with attachments, be, and hereby is, declared void and removed
from his military record.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03630
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03630 INDEX CODE: 125.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to show that his self-initiated elimination (SIE) from officer training school (OTS) be recharacterized to a form of disenrollment that would allow him to obtain a flying position with the Indiana Air National...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00606
The new procedures and AETC Form 139, Record of Commander's Review Action (Undergraduate Pilot Training) now allows for other options and leaves the return to UPT up to the discretion of the UPT commander. Had it been in use at the time of his elimination from pilot training, the AETC Form 139, Section III could have been used for his situation. The form states, "If recommended for elimination, the student should be considered for reinstatement in this course at a later date due to...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Undergraduate Flying Operations, Headquarters 19th Air Force/DOU, also reviewed the applicant’s records and provides the following comments: A. Based on the informed evaluations of his instructors, 19th AF/DOU supports the 71st OG/CC decision to eliminate applicant from JSUPT. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be returned to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02063
After only three training sorties, rather than tell his flight commander the complete situation, he simply told him he could not go fly, resulting in referral to the commander's review process. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/DOF recommended denial. In any case, the elimination letter provided by AFPC shows MOA as the elimination reason.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03275
SGPS supports the applicant’s request to have his records corrected to show elimination based on a medical diagnoses rather than SIE. However, if the Board’s decision is to grant the applicant’s request, his record may be changed to show elimination from JSUNT as a medical disqualification. We note that HQ AETC/SGPS (Exhibit B) supports the applicant’s request for correction of his record and the opportunity for him to apply for Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) consideration.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01805
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/XOOT recommends the applicant, provided he now meets the minimum flying hour requirements for award of the pilot rating, first secure a helicopter pilot operational flying position and then submit an application to appear before an Aeronautical Review Board in accordance with AFI 11-402, paragraph 2.11. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AETC/DOF recommends that the applicant not be reinstated...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 02883 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen ment of the Air Force relating to be corrected to with his show that...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant has submitted a request for correction of military records in regards to his self- initiated elimination (SIE) from T-4 1 training while attending the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). However, if the decision is to grant the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02208
Based on a review of the facts, we agree she should have met an FEB after her elimination from FWQ training as an FEB would be the only correct action to evaluate retention in (or removal from) training, and qualification for continued aviation service. She failed two opportunities to complete fixed wing training and should have met an FEB. ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01440
The course is a grueling three- day training in airsickness management for student pilots. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/DOF recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his package proves his desire and willingness to complete any program that he may be selected for in the future.