RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00099
INDEX NUMBER: 111.01; 131.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that his Primary Air Force
Specialty Code (PAFSC) is 46PX and that he be reconsidered for
continuation by the Selective Continuation Board which convened in
Dec 98.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has been a certified mental health nurse since X Sep 94, but
AFSC 46PX was never added to his record. He was told that because
his unit did not have a mental health service, it was not
necessary. He is a twice-deferred captain and discovered his
specialty is a mission-critical skill, requiring maximum retention
efforts.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a letter from HQ
Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) requesting award of AFSC 46PX,
dated XX Nov 98; his certification as a psychiatric and mental
health nurse by the American Nurses Credentialing Center from X Sep
94 to XX Aug 99; and a message from AFRC, dated XX Oct 98
(Exhibit A).
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Nurse Corps,
Reserve of the Air Force, on XX Dec 89. He was promoted to the
Reserve grade of captain, effective 18 Sep 91. The applicant’s
duty title on all of his Officer Performance Reports (OPR) from
XX Dec 89 through XX Jan 99, was that of clinical nurse. He was
relieved from his assignment on XX Aug 98, and transferred to
NARS/NA status, effective XX Sep 98. As of Retirement Year Ending
(RYE) XX Dec 98, he was credited with 12 years, 11 months and 29
days of satisfactory Federal service. Information extracted from
the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates that the applicant’s duty
and primary AFSC was 46N3, clinical nurse. On XX Feb 99, he
enlisted in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of SSgt. His duty
AFSC is 4N051, medical service journeyman, and he is an active
Reserve participant.
Applicant's OPR profile follows:
PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION
5 May 91 Meets Standards
5 May 92 Meets Standards
5 May 93 Meets Standards
5 May 94 Meets Standards
5 May 95 Meets Standards
5 May 96 Meets Standards
5 May 97 Meets Standards
5 May 98 Meets Standards
30 Jan 99 Meets Standards
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DP, reviewed
this application and recommended denial. While the applicant may
have performed duties as a mental health nurse, he never possessed
that AFSC during any of the promotion boards that considered him.
His officer selection folder (OSF) contains no information that he
ever performed duties as a mental health nurse, and there are no
authorized positions for a mental health nurse at his assigned
unit.
The FY99 Reserve of the Air Force Major Promotion Selection Board
was announced on X Aug 98, at which time the applicant was
identified as being twice deferred for promotion to major in his
only AFSC, 46N3--clinical nurse. On 22 Oct 98, the Secretary of
the Air Force approved a Selective Continuation Board for twice
deferred captains and majors within the Selected Reserve.
On 26 Oct 98, ARPC sent a message to all active and Reserve flights
notifying them of the criteria for a Selective Continuation Board.
One of the criteria was that the member must possess a primary AFSC
identified as mission critical. On 27 Oct 98, all eligibles were
sent a letter notifying them that the board’s convening date was
2 Dec 98, and that they had until 15 Nov 98 to apply. The
applicant was not notified of eligibility for continuation because
he did not posses the primary AFSC of mental health nurse. On
17 Nov 98, after the continuation board was announced, the
Classification and Retraining Program Manager for the AFRC
requested award of AFSC 46PX to the applicant based on his civilian
experience. While his records now reflect the mental health nurse
AFSC, it is only as a secondary AFSC and still would not afford him
the opportunity for continuation.
Currently, there are no provisions in law for a special selection
board (SSB) for continuation. If the AFBCMR disagrees with the
recommendation, the applicant’s request for SSB for the FY99
Reserve Selective Continuation Board will be held on file, pending
legislative authorization. A complete copy of ARPC/DP’s evaluation
is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states that the primary AFSCs for doctors and nurses
reflect the AFSC in which they are most qualified even though there
may be no authorized positions at their assigned units. He was
unaware until Nov 98, that mental health nurse is a specific Air
Force specialty that has a critical mission shortage. He is fully
qualified to perform the duties of mental health nurse. The
applicant submitted a statement from his commander indicating he
performed duties as a mental health nurse while on annual tours and
two statements from the Chief, Personnel Employment, Grissom AFB.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. On reaching this
conclusion, we noted the efforts of the applicant and his
supervisor to update his records to reflect 46P3 (Mental Health
Nurse) as his primary AFSC. However, due to an inordinate delay in
the processing of the request and the failure of the Personnnel
Employment Section at his base of assignment to ensure that the
update was properly reflected in a timely manner, he was not
identified as an officer who was eligible for consideration by the
Reserve Selective Continuation Board. Because he was not
identified as an eligible, he did not receive notification of
eligibility and was not afforded the opportunity to apply for
continuation. Inasmuch as the Air Force identified the 46P
specialty as a mission-critical skill requiring maximum retention
efforts, and the applicant is certified as a psychiatric and mental
health nurse, it is in the best interest of the Air Force to
reconsider him for continuation. Therefore, provided the applicant
meets all other criteria for consideration by a Selective
Continuation Board, we recommend that his record be corrected as
indicated below.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was awarded Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 46P3,
effective 4 November 1998.
b. On 15 November 1999, he applied for consideration for
continuation by the Reserve Selective Continuation Board, which
convened on 2-3 December 1998, and his application was approved by
competent authority;
It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be
considered for continuation by a Special Selection Board for the
December 1998 Reserve Selective Continuation Board, and if he is
selected for continuation by the Special Selection Board, the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records be notified at the
earliest practicable date so that all necessary and appropriate
actions may be completed.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 November 1999, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jan 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DP, dated 17 Mar 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 Apr 99.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Apr 99, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-00099
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that:
a. He was awarded Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 46P3,
effective 4 November 1998.
b. On 15 November 1999, he applied for consideration for
continuation by the Reserve Selective Continuation Board, which
convened on 2-3 December 1998, and his application was approved by
competent authority;
It is further directed that the applicant’s corrected record
be considered for continuation by a Special Selection Board for the
December 1998 Reserve Selective Continuation Board, and if he is
selected for continuation by the Special Selection Board, the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records be notified at the
earliest practicable date so that all necessary and appropriate
actions may be completed.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Members of the Board, Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, considered this application on 23 August 2000. Charlene M. Bradley Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPBB, dtd 24 Jun 00 AFBCMR 99-00099 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and, in a letter dated 14 April 1999, asserted the IG investigation was flawed because the rater never discussed any reported complaints during her performance feedback session five months before the IG investigation. After a thorough review of the evidence of...
Due to the lengthy process of his reserve assignment, he experienced a five month inactive period prior to the FY99 Air Force Reserve Major Selection Board promotion board. ARPC can provide no evidence that he is responsible for its incorrect mailing addresses. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was promoted to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1998-03235
If not selected for promotion to the grade of major, he be considered for continuation until the completion of 20 years of service. The applicant was considered and nonselected for promotion to the grade of major by an SSB, which convened on 1 March 1999, for the FY99 Line and Nonline Major Promotion Board. The applicant was notified by letter, 7 January 1999, that SSB consideration had been granted for the FY99 Line and Nonline Major Promotion Board (2 March 1998).
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9601894A.doc
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...
On 30 Sep 95, he was assigned to the Retired Reserve Section in the grade of E-7 and placed on the Air Force Reserve Retired List, awaiting pay at age 60. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel, HQ AFRC/DPM, has determined from their evaluation of the applicant’s case that he is not eligible for Reserve Transition Assistance Program (RTAP) benefits. A copy of his response is appended at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00591
On 30 Sep 95, he was assigned to the Retired Reserve Section in the grade of E-7 and placed on the Air Force Reserve Retired List, awaiting pay at age 60. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel, HQ AFRC/DPM, has determined from their evaluation of the applicant’s case that he is not eligible for Reserve Transition Assistance Program (RTAP) benefits. A copy of his response is appended at Exhibit...
Members of the Board, Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Mr. John E. Pettit, considered this application on 26 October 2000. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPBB, dtd 24 Jun 00 AFBCMR 99-00099 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
Because of the manning shortage of clinical nurses in the AFRes at that time, individuals with an Associate Degree in Nursing were entitled to a stipend under the Air Force Ready Reserve Stipend Program (AFRRSP) to pursue a Baccalaureate Degree in Nursing (BSN). Applying this argument to the stipend program generally would place an obligation on the Air Force to personally notify each affected officer prior to removing a specialty from the list of critical specialties. ...