t
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 2 8 0 8
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his current enlistment be changed to an
extension, or he be allowed to reenlist with a higher Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) Multiple. Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of, record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
I
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mrs. Barbara A . Westgate, Mr. Kenneth L.
Reinertson, and Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., considered this application
on 28 Jan 9 9 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U . S . C . 1552.
BARBARA A. WEST GAT^
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
€3. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78 1 5047 12
SUBJECT:
lication for Corre
Records
The applicant is requestinghis current reenlistment be changed to an extension or a
reenlistment granted with a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) Multiple.
The applicant alleges miswunseling by the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding
the option to extend versus reenlisting. However, he has provided no evidence (i.e., statement
from MPF counselor) to collaborate this allegation. As such, recommend disapproval of the
request.
Chief, Skills M%agement Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Mgmt
The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). .” Another states “I know that I can reenlist rather than extend, but I have elected to execute this extension instead of reenlisting.” Both of these statements clearly indicate the applicant was aware of the reenlistment options.
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that although miscounseling was confirmed by the MPF, with regard to applicant's eligibility for the SRB he is requesting, the applicant was still not entitled to a full six-year SRB based on three extensions of enlistment. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states that if partial relief is granted, because of the applicant being miscounseled, he would need a constructive reenlistment and be entitled...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98- 00838 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of reenlistment be changed from 5 January 1 9 9 8 to Bonus (SRB) . He requested to have his reenlistment back dated to 25 January 1 9 9 8 , to receive the SRB. 98-00838 AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this case and...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 2 0 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00954 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: His extension of enlistment on 15 June 1994 be canceled and he be reenlisted into the Regular Air Force for six years with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that the applicant was...
% The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) . At the time of her reenlistment, she had no reason to believe her AFSC would get an SRB or to delay her reenlistment until 1998.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00718 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APLICANT REQUEST THAT: His 17 January 2003 extension be cancelled and he be allowed to reenlist effective 20 January 2003, with authorization to a Zone A Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). Therefore, at the time of the applicant’s DOS in January 2003, the...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that at his reenlistment briefing on 11 January 1999, he signed a document, in good faith, indicating his intent to reenlist, after being briefed that he was to receive a SRB of 1.5. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
98-03 126 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF c Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: of the Department of the Air Force relating to e corrected to show that she was honorably discharged ber 1998, and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 October...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-00187
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that although miscounseling was confirmed by the MPF, with regard to applicant’s eligibility for the SRB he is requesting, the applicant was still not entitled to a full six-year SRB based on three extensions of enlistment. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states that if partial relief is granted, because of the applicant...
The applicant states that his MPF changed his reenlistment contract to reflect the increase in the SRB multiple and the Air Force should honor the contract. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that after further research concerning the reason for the change in the reenlistment document, the MPF advised that applicant’s contract was correct at the time of...