RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02306
INDEX CODE: 111.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The duty title and job description on his Enlisted Performance Report
(EPR) closing 12 April 1997 be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons applicant believes he has been the victim of an error
and/or an injustice are contained in his complete submission, which is
at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Acting Chief, BCMR & SSB Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPAB, indicates that
although the evaluators indorsed the applicant’s appeal, they provided
neither clarification nor explanation as to why the information
contained in the applicant’s personal brief was not available to them
when the report was initially rendered. Denial is recommended.
A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant
on 14 September 1998 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. All the rating chain
members support amending the duty title and job description of the EPR
in question. While they have not provided any explanation as to why
the contested report contained an incorrect title and description,
based on their willingness to correct these errors we believe any
doubt in this case should be resolved in the applicant’s favor. Also,
Enlisted Promotions at Randolph AFB has advised that the contested EPR
was first considered in promotion cycle 99E8 for senior master
sergeant. We therefore recommend his records be corrected as
reflected below and he be afforded supplemental promotion
consideration for the grade of senior master sergeant beginning with
cycle 99E8.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the word “Material”
in the Duty Title in Section II of the Enlisted Performance Report,
AF Form 910, rendered for the period 13 April 1996 through 12 April
1997, be changed to “Materiel,” and the text in the Key Duties,
Tasks, and Responsibilities block be replaced with the following:
“Supervises, organizes, and controls all maintenance and
support activities to include Life Support, Parachutes, Vehicles,
Weapons Control, and Supply elements. Conducts research using
computers, technical orders, commercial catalogues and local
venders. Screens transactions for priority and routine issue
requests for all aspects of Special Tactics. Tracks supply status by
monitoring and maintaining computer listings. Responsible for
maintaining Custodian Authorization/Custodian Receipt Listing
(CA/CRL). Directs the maintenance of suspense files and exercises
quality assurance to ensure timely procurement of supplies and
equipment. Validates documentation concerning contract repair,
services, and supplies. Reviews, integrates, and analyzes resource
requirements. Supervises special projects as directed by the
commander. ADDITIONAL DUTIES: Due-in from Maintenance (DIFM)
supervisor, International Merchant Purchase Authorization Card
(IMPAC) Approving Official.”
It is further recommended that he be provided supplemental
consideration for promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant
for all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 99E8.
If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to
supplemental consideration that are separate and apart, and
unrelated to the issues involved in this application, that would
have rendered the individual ineligible for the promotion, such
information will be documented and presented to the board for a
final determination on the individual's qualification for the
promotion.
If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection for
promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such promotion the
records shall be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
higher grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental
promotion and that he is entitled to all pay, allowances, and
benefits of such grade as of that date.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 6 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Gary Appleton, Member
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Aug 98, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPAB, dated 31 Aug 98.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Sep 98.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-02306
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that the word
“Material” in the Duty Title in Section II of the Enlisted Performance
Report, AF Form 910, rendered for the period 13 April 1996 through 12
April 1997, be changed to “Materiel,” and the text in the Key Duties,
Tasks, and Responsibilities block be replaced with the following:
“Supervises, organizes, and controls all maintenance and
support activities to include Life Support, Parachutes, Vehicles,
Weapons Control, and Supply elements. Conducts research using
computers, technical orders, commercial catalogues and local venders.
Screens transactions for priority and routine issue requests for all
aspects of Special Tactics. Tracks supply status by monitoring and
maintaining computer listings. Responsible for maintaining Custodian
Authorization/Custodian Receipt Listing (CA/CRL). Directs the
maintenance of suspense files and exercises quality assurance to
ensure timely procurement of supplies and equipment. Validates
documentation concerning contract repair, services, and supplies.
Reviews, integrates, and analyzes resource requirements. Supervises
special projects as directed by the commander. ADDITIONAL DUTIES: Due-
in from Maintenance (DIFM) supervisor, International Merchant Purchase
Authorization Card (IMPAC) Approving Official.”
It is further directed that he be provided supplemental
consideration for promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant for
all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 99E8.
If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to
supplemental consideration that are separate and apart, and unrelated
to the issues involved in this application, that would have rendered
the individual ineligible for the promotion, such information will be
documented and presented to the board for a final determination on the
individual's qualification for the promotion.
If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection
for promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such promotion
the records shall be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
higher grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental
promotion and that he is entitled to all pay, allowances, and benefits
of such grade as of that date.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the DPPPAB evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he is providing all the applicable documents concerning his request to have the contested report corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Enlisted Promotion Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and states that should the Board void the report closing 1 March 1997 as requested, and direct the report closing 1 August 1996 be made a matter of record, providing he is otherwise eligible, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with cycle 97E7. Based on the documentation submitted, it...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1997-03345
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Enlisted Promotion Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and states that should the Board void the report closing 1 March 1997 as requested, and direct the report closing 1 August 1996 be made a matter of record, providing he is otherwise eligible, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with cycle 97E7. Based on the documentation submitted, it...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and indicated that should the closeout date be changed from 11 Mar 97 to 7 Oct 96, it would be eligible to be used in the promotion process for the 97E7 cycle (promotions effective Aug 97 - Jul 98). A complete copy of the DPPPAB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00944 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) he has provided, rendered for the period 2 Jul 95 through 27 Nov 95, be added to his official personnel record. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
Therefore, DPPPAB recommended the Board direct the removal of the mid-term feedback date from the contested EPR and add the following statement: “Ratee has established that no mid-term feedback session was provided in accordance with AFI 36-2403.” A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 10 Sep 99 for review and response. The mid-term feedback date be removed...
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, copies of several of his EPRs, a statement from the rater and indorser of the contested report, and other documentation relating to his appeal. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, BCMR & SSB Section, AFPC/DPPPAB, also reviewed this application and indicated that the applicant was involved in an off- duty domestic incident during the time the contested EPR was being finalized. ...
The applicant filed a similar appeal under AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, which the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) denied. Without clear-cut explanation or evidence, we do not believe the contested report is not accurate as written, and do not support his request to correct EPR. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
EPR profile since 1992 reflects the following: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION 29 Jan 92 5 29 Jan 93 5 14 May 94 5 * 14 May 95 5 14 May 96 5 15 Nov 96 5 15 Nov 97 5 5 Oct 98 5 * Contested report _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion & Military Testing Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and states that should the Board replace the report with the closing date of 1 October...
Rather than closing out the report, the commander removed the rater’s name from the reporting official block, assumed the duties of his reporting official, and submitted the report as if he had been his (applicant’s) supervisor for the previous 332 days. However, if the Board recommends removing the report, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with the 99E8 cycle, provided he is recommended by the commander and is otherwise eligible. A complete...