RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02123
INDEX CODE: 137.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to change his Survivor Benefit Plan election from “spouse and
child” to “spouse” only coverage.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not made aware of how SBP would adversely affect his mentally
incapacitated son’s other benefits. His son was eventually moved to a
state care facility due to his wife’s poor health. The state care facility
provides all the psychological, medical, and physical care necessary for
his son at no cost to his son or himself. However, the state care facility
imposes fund limitations on its clients. For instance, his trust fund must
not exceed $1,000. Making his son his SBP beneficiary negates his state
care eligibility because he would be getting a regular monthly income which
exceeds their limitations. If his son receives any financial support from
SBP or any other income source, his stay at the state care facility would
be cut off. If he had been told when signing up for the SBP about the
adverse impact on his handicapped son’s other benefits, there is no doubt
in his mind he would not have included his son as a beneficiary for his
SBP. He is not looking for any refund of premiums, only what is in the
best interest of their son’s welfare and well-being.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Prior to his retirement, effective 1 December 1977, the applicant was
married, had eligible children and elected spouse and child SBP coverage
based on full retired pay.
The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records shows
that the applicant’s son (DOB: 21 June 1956) is permanently incapacitated.
Unmarried children are eligible beneficiaries until they reach age 18, or
22 if attending school on a full-time basis; however, incapacitated
children remain eligible as long as they are unmarried and mentally or
physically incapable of self-support because of a condition that existed
prior to age 18 (22 if a full-time student). The member must supply
medical documentation to substantiate an incapacitated child’s eligibility.
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) annotates member’s
record so that coverage will not automatically be terminated when the
youngest child attains age 22.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, Directorate of Pers Program Management,
AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that unless the applicant
provides proof that his incapacitated son is now self-supporting, or has
lost his eligibility due to marriage, the premiums will continue to be
deducted as required by law. They understand the incongruity of one
governmental benefit adversely affecting another. In the past, they have
advised members to instruct a handicapped child’s conservator not to apply
for the SBP. This action may not ensure the SBP annuity is disregarded by
an agency in determining a patient’s income limit qualification.
Nonetheless, there is no option in the laws controlling SBP, or in the
disenrollment authorization by Public Law 105-85, to terminate only the
child’s portion and retain the spouse’s coverage. There is no evidence of
Air Force error or injustice in this case; therefore, they recommend the
request be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26
April 1999, for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. We agree with the Air Force that there is
no error in this case. However, in view of the fact that applicant’s
incapacitated son’s medical care will be stopped if his son receives SBP
premiums, we believe that it would be unjust to deny the relief requested.
Furthermore, it appears that the applicant may not have been provided
information concerning the adverse impact of receiving SBP premiums would
have on his son’s other benefits. In view of the foregoing and to offset
any possibility of an injustice to the applicant, we recommend his records
be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. His 8 September 1977, Survivor Benefit Plan election for
“spouse and child coverage” be declared void and removed from his record.
b. On 30 November 1977, he elected spouse coverage only under the
Survivor Benefit Plan based on full retired pay.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 15 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Ms. Ann L. Heidig, Member
Ms. Gloria J. Williams, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 9 Apr 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 Apr 99.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-02123
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. His 8 September 1977, Survivor Benefit Plan election for
“spouse and child coverage” be, and hereby is, declared void and removed
from his record.
b. On 30 November 1977, he elected spouse coverage only under
the Survivor Benefit Plan based on full retired pay.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-079
The applicant stated that his son receives monthly Social Security Supplemental Income (SSI) benefits as well as Medicaid assistance to pay for group home care, day support, transportation, case management, medication, and psychiatric service, all of which amounts to a yearly benefit of approximately $105,333.21. CGPPC stated that the applicant did not elect out of SBP and instead elected child and spouse coverage, and that there is no evidence in the record that either the applicant or his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00460
DPPTR states that if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the member’s record should be corrected to reflect he declined spouse and child coverage effective 29 September 1982, and correction should be contingent upon the member’s waiving refund of any SBP premiums deducted before and after the death of his wife. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02399
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force he elected child coverage under the SBP. If his daughter’s disability was diagnosed while she was otherwise eligible, the member could have elected coverage on her behalf during the initial open enrollment; however, there is no evidence such an election was submitted. We believe the applicant would have elected to provide coverage for his daughter...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). A member who is unmarried at retirement may elect coverage for a newly acquired spouse; however, the election must be made before the first anniversary of the marriage. However, if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the member‘s record should be corrected to reflect on 24 Mar 89 he elected to add his spouse to his child only...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt. ...
AIR FORCE BOA~D FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS . The 'appropriate Air Force 'office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). However should the Board decide to grant relief, the member’s records should be corrected to void his election to add71is child as an SBP beneficiary and refund the portion of the SBP premiums related to the child coverage.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00680
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that a member who is married at retirement and fails to provide coverage for an eligible spouse may not provide coverage in the future, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment period. The one-year enrollment period to add family members acquired after retirement is applicable only when no previous category of the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that a member who is married at retirement and fails to provide coverage for an eligible spouse may not provide coverage in the future, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment period. The one-year enrollment period to add family members acquired after retirement is applicable only when no previous category of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00895
To provide the applicant additional time to terminate his SBP coverage would be unfair to other members in similar situations, therefore they recommend denying the applicant’s request. On 22 Aug 02, the AFBCMR Staff, at the request of the Board, forwarded a letter to the applicant requesting he provide information regarding if guardianship has been established for his wife and clarification if the income requirement was regulated by state law or was it a policy of an agency within the state...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01220
The applicant married on 1 September 2000, but he did not elect SBP coverage for his spouse within the first year following his marriage. There is no record that he submitted a request within the first year of marriage. If the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that on 31 August 2001 he elected to add his spouse to his child only coverage based on full-retired pay.