Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802123
Original file (9802123.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  98-02123
            INDEX CODE: 137.03

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to change his Survivor Benefit Plan election from “spouse  and
child” to “spouse” only coverage.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was not made aware  of  how  SBP  would  adversely  affect  his  mentally
incapacitated son’s other benefits.  His  son  was  eventually  moved  to  a
state care facility due to his wife’s poor health.  The state care  facility
provides all the psychological, medical, and  physical  care  necessary  for
his son at no cost to his son or himself.  However, the state care  facility
imposes fund limitations on its clients.  For instance, his trust fund  must
not exceed $1,000.  Making his son his SBP  beneficiary  negates  his  state
care eligibility because he would be getting a regular monthly income  which
exceeds their limitations.  If his son receives any financial  support  from
SBP or any other income source, his stay at the state  care  facility  would
be cut off.  If he had been told when signing  up  for  the  SBP  about  the
adverse impact on his handicapped son’s other benefits, there  is  no  doubt
in his mind he would not have included his son  as  a  beneficiary  for  his
SBP.  He is not looking for any refund of premiums,  only  what  is  in  the
best interest of their son’s welfare and well-being.

Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Prior to his retirement,  effective  1  December  1977,  the  applicant  was
married, had eligible children and elected spouse  and  child  SBP  coverage
based on full retired pay.

The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System  (DEERS)  records  shows
that the applicant’s son (DOB: 21 June 1956) is permanently incapacitated.

Unmarried children are eligible beneficiaries until they reach  age  18,  or
22  if  attending  school  on  a  full-time  basis;  however,  incapacitated
children remain eligible as long as  they  are  unmarried  and  mentally  or
physically incapable of self-support because of  a  condition  that  existed
prior to age 18 (22  if  a  full-time  student).   The  member  must  supply
medical documentation to substantiate an incapacitated child’s  eligibility.
 The Defense  Finance  and  Accounting  Service  (DFAS)  annotates  member’s
record so that coverage  will  not  automatically  be  terminated  when  the
youngest child attains age 22.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, Directorate of Pers Program  Management,
AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that unless  the  applicant
provides proof that his incapacitated son is  now  self-supporting,  or  has
lost his eligibility due to marriage,  the  premiums  will  continue  to  be
deducted as required  by  law.   They  understand  the  incongruity  of  one
governmental benefit adversely affecting another.  In the  past,  they  have
advised members to instruct a handicapped child’s conservator not  to  apply
for the SBP.  This action may not ensure the SBP annuity is  disregarded  by
an  agency  in  determining  a   patient’s   income   limit   qualification.
Nonetheless, there is no option in the  laws  controlling  SBP,  or  in  the
disenrollment authorization by Public Law  105-85,  to  terminate  only  the
child’s portion and retain the spouse’s coverage.  There is no  evidence  of
Air Force error or injustice in this case;  therefore,  they  recommend  the
request be denied.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  26
April 1999, for review and response.  As of this date, no response has  been
received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable injustice.  We agree with the Air Force that there  is
no error in this case.  However,  in  view  of  the  fact  that  applicant’s
incapacitated son’s medical care will be stopped if  his  son  receives  SBP
premiums, we believe that it would be unjust to deny the  relief  requested.
Furthermore, it appears that  the  applicant  may  not  have  been  provided
information concerning the adverse impact of receiving  SBP  premiums  would
have on his son’s other benefits.  In view of the foregoing  and  to  offset
any possibility of an injustice to the applicant, we recommend  his  records
be corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:

      a.    His  8  September  1977,  Survivor  Benefit  Plan  election  for
“spouse and child coverage” be declared void and removed from his record.

      b.    On 30 November 1977, he elected spouse coverage only  under  the
Survivor Benefit Plan based on full retired pay.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 15 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

              Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
              Mr. Mike Novel, Member
          Ms. Ann L. Heidig, Member
              Ms. Gloria J. Williams, Examiner (without vote)

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 98, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 9 Apr 99.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 Apr 99.





                                   BARBARA A. WESTGATE
                                   Panel Chair


AFBCMR 98-02123




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to   , be corrected to show that:

            a.   His 8 September 1977, Survivor Benefit Plan election for
“spouse and child coverage” be, and hereby is, declared void and removed
from his record.

            b.   On 30 November 1977, he elected spouse coverage only under
the Survivor Benefit Plan based on full retired pay.




            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency


Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-079

    Original file (2009-079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant stated that his son receives monthly Social Security Supplemental Income (SSI) benefits as well as Medicaid assistance to pay for group home care, day support, transportation, case management, medication, and psychiatric service, all of which amounts to a yearly benefit of approximately $105,333.21. CGPPC stated that the applicant did not elect out of SBP and instead elected child and spouse coverage, and that there is no evidence in the record that either the applicant or his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00460

    Original file (BC-2004-00460.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPTR states that if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the member’s record should be corrected to reflect he declined spouse and child coverage effective 29 September 1982, and correction should be contingent upon the member’s waiving refund of any SBP premiums deducted before and after the death of his wife. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02399

    Original file (BC-2004-02399.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force he elected child coverage under the SBP. If his daughter’s disability was diagnosed while she was otherwise eligible, the member could have elected coverage on her behalf during the initial open enrollment; however, there is no evidence such an election was submitted. We believe the applicant would have elected to provide coverage for his daughter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800339

    Original file (9800339.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). A member who is unmarried at retirement may elect coverage for a newly acquired spouse; however, the election must be made before the first anniversary of the marriage. However, if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the member‘s record should be corrected to reflect on 24 Mar 89 he elected to add his spouse to his child only...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201220

    Original file (0201220.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801012

    Original file (9801012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOA~D FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS . The 'appropriate Air Force 'office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). However should the Board decide to grant relief, the member’s records should be corrected to void his election to add71is child as an SBP beneficiary and refund the portion of the SBP premiums related to the child coverage.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00680

    Original file (BC-1998-00680.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that a member who is married at retirement and fails to provide coverage for an eligible spouse may not provide coverage in the future, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment period. The one-year enrollment period to add family members acquired after retirement is applicable only when no previous category of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800680

    Original file (9800680.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that a member who is married at retirement and fails to provide coverage for an eligible spouse may not provide coverage in the future, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment period. The one-year enrollment period to add family members acquired after retirement is applicable only when no previous category of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00895

    Original file (BC-2002-00895.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    To provide the applicant additional time to terminate his SBP coverage would be unfair to other members in similar situations, therefore they recommend denying the applicant’s request. On 22 Aug 02, the AFBCMR Staff, at the request of the Board, forwarded a letter to the applicant requesting he provide information regarding if guardianship has been established for his wife and clarification if the income requirement was regulated by state law or was it a policy of an agency within the state...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01220

    Original file (BC-2003-01220.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant married on 1 September 2000, but he did not elect SBP coverage for his spouse within the first year following his marriage. There is no record that he submitted a request within the first year of marriage. If the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that on 31 August 2001 he elected to add his spouse to his child only coverage based on full-retired pay.