Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802051
Original file (9802051.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  98-02051
            INDEX CODE 110.00
      XXXXX COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXX     HEARING DESIRED: NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active  Duty,
Block 17, be changed to show dental treatment was  not  completed  prior  to
separation.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust  and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts  pertaining  to  this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter  prepared  by  the
appropriate office of the Air Force.   Accordingly,  there  is  no  need  to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant, reviewed the application and  states  that  the
applicant’s  dental  records  confirm  that   all   dental   treatments   or
examinations were not completed prior to separation.   The  BCMR  Consultant
concludes that the DD Form 214 should include a statement and  be  corrected
to show: “Member was not provided all appropriate dental services within  90
days of separation.”  Block 15 should be changed to “No.”

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice.  The Board  notes  that  the  BCMR
Medical Consultant states that the applicant is correct in noting  that  her
on-going dental care was not completed prior to her  retirement  date.   The
BCMR Medical Consultant stated that the applicant’s record should include  a
statement  and  be  corrected  to  show:  “Member  was  not   provided   all
appropriate dental services within 90 days of separation.”  Block 17  should
be changed to “No.”  Therefore, we  recommend  the  applicant's  records  be
corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that DD Form 214, Certificate of  Release
or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows:

      Block 17: Place an X in the “No” block rather than the “Yes” block.

      Block 18: The statement  “Member  was  not  provided  all  appropriate
dental services within 90 days of separation.” be added.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 12 January 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Panel Chair
      Member
      Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 July 1998, w/atchs
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant,
               dated 14 September 1998.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 October 1998.
   Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Response, dated 15 October 1998,
               w/atchs.
   Exhibit F.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant,
               dated 28 December 1998.





                 Panel Chair

AFBCMR 98-02051




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating  to  XXXXX,  XXXXXX,  be  corrected  to  show  that  DD  Form  214,
Certificate of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active  Duty,  be  amended  as
follows:

            Block 17: Place an X in the “No” block  rather  than  the  “Yes”
block.

             Block  18:  The  statement  “Member  was   not   provided   all
appropriate dental services within 90 days of separation.” be added.





Director
                                                                    Air
Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03332

    Original file (BC-2005-03332.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum present in the applicant’s personnel file indicates that an examination and appropriate services and treatment were accomplished within 90 days of retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his DD Form 214, dated 31 Aug 05, be corrected to reflect in Item 17, Member was provided complete dental...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02302

    Original file (BC-2003-02302.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she entered the Army Orthodontic program for her braces, she had retainability for the dental work to be completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-02443

    Original file (BC-2005-02443.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 110.00 AFBCMR BC-2005-02443 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02443

    Original file (BC-2005-02443.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 110.00 AFBCMR BC-2005-02443 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802844

    Original file (9802844.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Retirements Branch, Directorate, Personnel Program Mgmt, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states the estimate the applicant received on 2 December 1997 clearly states “the dollar amount shown below is an estimate of your retirement pay.” This document also directs members to “Contact DFAS-CL for official retired pay estimates.” There is no evidence the applicant ever consulted that agency. They produced a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800916

    Original file (9800916.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Neither her Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) contract nor the AFI states that her Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) ADSC could not be served during an active duty military residency. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100280

    Original file (0100280.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00280 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Item 17, (Member Was Provided Complete Dental Examination and All Appropriate Dental Services and Treatment Within 90 Days Prior to Separation) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802259

    Original file (9802259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Consultant indicated that a review of his dental records revealed the applicant was furnished a statement that he did complete all appropriate dental care and had a complete dental examination within 90 days prior to his separation. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation was at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he was given a complete examination on 19...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02712

    Original file (BC-2002-02712.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates in her response to the Air Force evaluation that she disagrees with the BCMR Medical Consultant’s statement of her request. AF Form 618, Medical Board Report, coupled with the narrative summaries/consultations, commander’s letters, etc., address her unfitting conditions as required for review by the PEB. Disability...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-055

    Original file (1999-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, on November 16, 1998, the applicant signed a third extension contract, extending his enlistment for two years and six months, through February 3, 200x. The Chief Counsel explained that the applicant’s PCS orders to xxxxx stated that he was required to have at least three years of obligated service before reporting to his new unit. Unless otherwise indicated, they are required to have one year of OBLI- SERV remaining upon reporting to the new unit.” ALDIST 290/98, issued on...