AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01863
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Fa3
Applicant requests that his general , under honorable conditions,
discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Mr. William H.
Anderson, and Mr. Joseph A. Roj considered this application on
11 February 1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. n
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
Panel Ch
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
OCT 2 6 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS
550 C Street West Ste 11
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was discharged fiom the Air Force 12
Feb 70 under the provisions of AFR 39-12 (Unfitness) and received an undec honorable
conditions (general) discharge. He served 02 years 04 months and 12 days total active service.
Reauested Action. The applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded to honorable.
Basis for Request. Applicant does not claim an injustice in the discharge he received over 18
years ago.
Facts. On 12 Jan 70, applicant’s commander recommended that the applicant be considered for
discharge from the service by reason of unfitness. Commander’s reasons for his recommended
action was the applicant’s frequent involvement of discreditable nature with military authorities.
Specifically, applicant had received two Art 15s for being absence without leave on two different
occasions. Had received oral and written reprimands for such infractions as failure to secure
government property, failure to meet required dormitory inspection standards and two traffic
citations. On 15 Jan 70, applicant voluntarily submitted a request to be discharge and indicated in
his application his entitlement to a board hearing and elected to waive that right. Applicant
indicated in his application that he understood that if his application was approved his discharge
could be an undesirable discharge. He further indicated that legal counsel had been made
available to him. On 11 Feb 70, the discharge authority approved the recommendation for
discharge for unfitness and directed the applicant be issued an under honorable conditions
(general) discharge certificate.
Discussion. This case has been reviewed and the discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the sound discretion of
the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The
records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
c
Recommendation. Applicant did not submit any new evidence or identi@ any errors in the
discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received.
Accordingly, we recommend applicant’s request be denied. He has not filed a timely request.
%@dT
JOHN . W O TEN,DAF
Militan, Personnel Mgmt Spec
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FQRCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S -- 21 August 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPAPPl 550 C Street West, Ste...
Funds allotted for payment of air mechanics are continued i n force u n t i l authorization for increased grades is received and conversion made i n compliance w i t h instructions above mechanics ratings t o noncommissioned grades is based on the fund8 allotted In t o the Air Corps f o r air mechanics grades within t h e present fiscal year. SUBJECT: TO : ,Appointment of' Air Mechanics t o Grades' Cammanding Generals, Army Air Forces, Army Ground Forces, Services of Supply, Armies, Army...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The applicant is requesting several actions we will address the one requesting the Board restore him to the rank of Airman Second Class. - Based upon the information provided we are forwarding this application for correction of military records without recommendation.
I 4 By letters dated 7 August 1997, 26 October 1997, 9 December 1997, and 16 February 1998, applicant requested reconsideration of his He provided copies of documentation submitted with his appeal. 3 AFBCMR 91-01962 JAJM recommended that the Board deny the applicant's request: (1) on the basis that it is untimely; (2) on the merits; and ( 3 ) because it does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. Applicant contends that his SF Form 88, Report of Medical Examination, dated 16 August...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant-'s request and provided an advisory opinion T O the Board rezommending the application be deniea (Exhibit 1L. The applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded to-honorable Basis for Request. He hrther admitted that since Apr 76 he committed consensual homosexual acts with three individuals The board found applicant elisible for discharge and recommended his separation with a discharge under other than honorable conditions The...
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board,the right to a personal appearance with counsel and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. ORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct described in the applicant’s record warranted the General characterization.
Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. E. F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions Addendum to Air Force Advisory Opinion AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S A I R F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E E A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 12 Jun 98 FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPEP 550 C Street West Ste 07 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4709 SUB cords (DD Form 149) REQUESTED ACTION:...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00037
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1)ECISIONAL RATIONALE I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of bischarge to honorable. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant s reason and authority for discharge inequitable. Svd: 3 yrs 2 months 4...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.