ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00546
INDEX CODE: 100.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE
XXX XX XXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
Applicant submitted an application to the Board dated 18 February 1998. On
25 June 1998, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request that his
record reflect he was TDY to from May 1971 through June 1971. A complete
copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. At the time
the application was considered by the Board, the letter from applicant’s
wife was not a part of the record.
In a letter dated 14 July 1998, applicant states that the statement from
his wife was forwarded to the Board prior to the time his case was
considered. He request that his application be reconsidered. Applicant’s
request, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing applicant’s
prior submission and his additional documentation, to include the statement
from his wife, we are not persuaded that applicant’s records are in error
or unjust. Applicant’s records reflect a tour of duty in from 23 April
1968 to 23 April 1969. However, the records before this Board does not
reflect he was TDY during April 1971 to May 1971. The Board requested
records from the Veterans Administration (VA); however, there is no
indication in the VA records that applicant was TDY to in April through
May 1971. We have thoroughly reviewed all available records and there is
no documentation to substantiate that he was TDY to during the period in
question. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we again
find no basis upon which to recommend favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 4 August 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 2 Jul 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Jul 98, w/atchs.
PATRICIA J. ZARODKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01395 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1966. There are no documents in his records that support his claim that he was TDY to Vietnam. In applicant’s...
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Sep 99 for review and response within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
A copy of the complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the case and provided the pertinent information regarding the applicant’s demotion. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the narrative reason for his discharge should be changed or his grade restored. Exhibit B.
B RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01921 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1967 Under-Other-Than-Honorable-Conditions (UOTHC) discharge for the good of the service be changed to an honorable medical discharge. After a thorough review of the documents pertaining to this appeal, we are not persuaded...
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01814A
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s nephew provided a statement, which the applicant signed. We note that HQ AFPC/DPPD disagreed with the Medical Consultant’s recommendation for a 30% disability retirement. However, while he may now have or may ultimately be given a higher disability rating by the DVA, the Air Force disability system stipulates that...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00606 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dismissal from the Air Force be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Associate Chief, Military Justice Division, Air Force...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.