RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02996
INDEX CODE: 136.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to retire from the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Retirements Branch, Directorate of Pers Program Management, AFPC/DPPRR,
reviewed the application and states that no error or injustice occurred in
the processing of applicant’s request for Special Separation Benefit (SSB)
separation. All actions by the member were voluntary. The applicant made
a conscious decision to separate and receive the monetary bonus rather than
remaining on active duty for an additional 5 months in order to reach
retirement eligibility. Member’s reason for doing this was because he knew
if he was retired, he would have to forfeit either his VA disability
compensation or his retirement pay since he could not receive both. That
logic remains true for retirement pay as well as separation pay. The
contract, which
the applicant signed on 29 September 1992, contained all the statements
required by law and DoD policy; applicant was paid the SSB amount that was
agreed to and those funds have not been recouped. The VA disability
compensation awarded to the applicant was in addition to that promised
under SSB and, following the period of time that a like amount is reduced
from the VA compensation, he will continue to receive VA payments for the
remainder of his life. There are no provisions of law to allow payment of
retired pay unless the member has met all requirements to receive such pay.
The applicant’s request for retirement is not appropriate with only 19
years, 7 months, and 2 days of active service. Additionally, there are no
provisions of law that allow additional crediting of service for service
not performed. And, finally, it is important to note that numerous prior
military personnel have been granted VA disability compensation entitlement
following receipt of either Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) or SSB
separation pay. It would be unfair to make such a change to this member’s
military record due to his eligibility for VA disability compensation
without also changing all the other prior Air Force members falling into
this category. They recommend denial of applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 18 May 1998 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the evidence of
record, we believe that the applicant’s decision to separate from the Air
Force, under the Special Separation Benefits (SSB) program, was based on
inaccurate information. It appears that the applicant believed that he
could accept the lump sum SSB and also received Veteran Administration (VA)
compensation after he separated from the Air Force. However, after
receiving VA disability compensation, he was advised that there was a law,
Title 10, United States Code, stating that he would have to repay the lump
sum payment of almost $72,000 before he could receive any VA payments.
Applicant states that had he been aware of this law, he would not have
separated under the SSB program but would have continue on active duty for
an additional 5 months until he was retirement eligible. While the
applicant has not provided evidence that Air Force officials miscounseled
him, in view of the short period of time needed to become eligible for
retirement, we believe that had he been aware of the requirement to repay
the lump sum payment prior to receiving VA compensation, he would have
continued on active duty for an additional 5 months. In view of the above
findings and in an effect to remove any possibility of an injustice, we
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was not released from active
duty under the provisions of AFR 39-10, on 29 September 1992, but was
continued on active duty until 29 February 1993, on which date he was
released from active duty and retired for length of service, effective 1
March 1993.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 12 May 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Member
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Sept 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRR, dated 6 May 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 May 98.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 97-02996
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not released from
active duty under the provisions of AFR 39-10, on 29 September 1992, but
was continued on active duty until 29 February 1993, on which date he was
released from active duty and retired for length of service, effective 1
March 1993.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air
Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02996
There are no provisions of law to allow payment of retired pay unless the member has met all requirements to receive such pay. And, finally, it is important to note that numerous prior military personnel have been granted VA disability compensation entitlement following receipt of either Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) or SSB separation pay. While the applicant has not provided evidence that Air Force officials miscounseled him, in view of the short period of time needed to become...
, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97- 02288 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AUG 1 4 1998 APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: His Air Force Reserve time, before he went on active duty, be moved to the end of his active duty in order for his last six (6) years of service be reflected as Air Force Reserve time. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we note that when the applicant was found...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03394 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to retire under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) rather than separating under the Special Selection Bonus (SSB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03587
The applicant’s Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) do not show any evidence of impairment of duty performance and there are no duty limiting profiles in his medical records. Further, active duty servicemembers who develop medical problems during the final 12 months of their active duty period are presumed fit for continued active duty unless there is clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. The Medical Consultant further states the evidence of record does not indicate that...
Had an MEB been initiated and presented to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) during the time frame just prior to his release, the Board would have found him unfit for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a 20% disability rating. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Claims Branch, Directorate of Debt and Claims Management, DFAS-DE/FYCC, states that after a thorough review of the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03075
Had an MEB been initiated and presented to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) during the time frame just prior to his release, the Board would have found him unfit for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a 20% disability rating. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Claims Branch, Directorate of Debt and Claims Management, DFAS-DE/FYCC, states that after a thorough review of the...
Had he been properly briefed and his commander not wrongfully threatened disciplinary action and misrepresented information regarding his continued eligibility to serve in the Reserve, he would not have separated but instead remained on active duty until he was eligible to retire for length of service. The evidence of record fails to show that any error or injustice occurred in his separation processing that would support his current request for retirement consideration. When enlisted...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02062
DPPRR states if a member does not have eligibility or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service, the member will remain in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for this program. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that when he was briefed on CSB no time frame was mentioned. After a thorough review of the evidence presented, it appears the applicant was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00691
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00691 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS) be changed from 14 Feb 86 to 9 Sep 86. They state that in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, Date Initial Entry into Uniformed Services (DIEUS),...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Special Programs Section, HQ AFPC/DPPRRP, also evaluated the case and recommended against extending the applicant’s retirement date because there are no provisions of law that permit extending a Regular officer’s mandatory retirement date, other than specific reasons/laws listed in the evaluation. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 10 May 00, w/atchs. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-00692 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...