,
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 97- 02288
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
AUG 1 4 1998
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
His Air Force Reserve time, before he went on active duty, be
moved to the end of his active duty in order for his last six (6)
years of service be reflected as Air Force Reserve time.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was found physically disqualified from further Air National
Guard (ANG) service and was involuntarily separated. He states
he was informed that since he had 16 years of service, being
involuntarily separated, he would be eligible for reduced
retirement pay at age 60. He was later informed by Headquarters
Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) that he would not be
eligible for retired pay because his last six (6) years of
service was not in the Reserve.
Applicant's submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force Office of
Primary Responsibility (OPR) . Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel Program Management, Headquarters Air
Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC/DPAR), states that the Fiscal
Year (FY) 1995 National Defense Authorization Act, signed into
law on 5 October 1994, authorized members who have completed at
least 15 but less than 20 years of satisfactory Federal service,
and who are medically disqualified for retention in the military
service, early qualification for retired pay at age 60 under the
provisions of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1273a.
Applicant submitted an AF Form 131, Application for Transfer to
the Retired Reserve by reason of physical disqualification to be
effective on 15 October 1997. He states he was informed that
since he had 16 years of service and was being involuntarily
separated that he would be eligible for reduced retirement pay at
age 6 0 .
Applicant's records show that he will have 16 years, 2 months,
and 20 days of satisfactory service on 15 October 1997. However,
he does not meet the requirement of having the last 6 years of
qualifying service in a Reserve component.
HQ ARPC/DPAR
recommends his request be approved.
Applicant participated
satisfactorily until he was found to be medically disqualified
for worldwide duty and was no longer able to participate.
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
Based on the applicant's voluntary release from active duty on
27 July 1992, for which he received the Special Separation
Benefit (SSB) lump sum payment, the AFBCMR requested an
additional advisory opinion. It was requested that his records
be reviewed and a determination made as to whether or not
applicant would have been eligible for the Special Separation
Bonus (SSB) should the active service period be changed. The
AFBCMR also requested a determination be made that if the
applicant's records were corrected by changing his active duty
time to Reserve time, and if found that he would not have been
eligible for the SSB lump sum payment, would the Air Force be
required to recoup the SSB payment.
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Retirements Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRR, states that the
applicant's records were reviewed and it was found that the
applicant was not eligible for SSB under the Fiscal Year
1992/1993 (FY92/93) drawdown policy. In order to be eligible for
SSB, applicant's Total Active Federal Military Service Date
(TAFMSD) had to be 31 December 1983; applicant's TAFMSD is
11 April 1984. However, Title 10 U.S.C., Section 1174 states a
member must have six but less than twenty years of active
service. So, by law (Section 1174) , the applicant was eligible
for SSB. They cannot say how or why the applicant was approved
for SSB in FY92 without meeting Air Force policy guidelines, but
they can say that he did meet the requirements as outlined in
Section 1174. It is possible the applicant was approved as an
exception to policy by the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel
Council, although this cannot be verified since there are no
records from that time.
2
Since the applicant would be eligible for the SSB even if his
service dates change, recoupment of monies is not necessary.
Section 1174a and 1174h states that a member who received
separation pay and later qualifies for retired or retainer pay
will have deducted the total amount of separation pay.
A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit D .
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant on 18 May 1998 for review and response within 30
days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
off ice.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
1.
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice
warranting favorable consideration to applicants request. After
a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's
submission, we note that when the applicant was found medically
disqualified for retention in the military service he was
informed that since he had 16 years of service and was being
involuntarily separated, he would be eligible for reduced
retirement pay at age 60. However, after he submitted his
application for transfer to the Retired Reserve, it was found
that since he did not meet the requirement of having the last six
years of qualifying service in a Reserve component, he was
ineligible for early retirement under the Reserve Transition
Assistance Program (RTAP) .
HQ ARPC/DPAR recommends the
applicant's request be approved and we agree.
Applicant
participated satisfactorily until he was found to be medically
disqualified for worldwide duty and was no longer able to
participate. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
3
a. On 7 March 1991, he was honorably released from active
duty in the Regular Air Force, received a Special Separation
Bonus (SSB) under the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, Section
1174 (h) and 1174a. and, was transferred to the Air Force Reserve
in the grade of staff sergeant.
b. He enlisted in the U. S. Air Force Reserve on 8 March
1991 through 27 July 1992 with the component-Reserve in the grade
of staff sergeant.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 4 August 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603 :
Ms. Martha Maust, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as
following documentary evidence was considered:
recommended. The
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Microfiche Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPAR, dated 30 Sep 97.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRR, dated 4 May 98,
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 May 98.
w/atchs.
MAUST '
&THA
Panel Chair
4
.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 97-02288
AUG 1 4 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A
Stat 116), it is directed that:
itary records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
corrected to show that:
a. On 7 March 199 1, he was honorably released from active duty in the Regular Air
Force, received a Special Separation Bonus (SSB) under the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code,
Section 1 174 (h) and 1 174a. and, was transferred to the Air Force Reserve in the grade of staff
sergeant.
b. He enlisted in the U. S. Air Force Reserve on 8 March 1991 through 27 July
1992 with the component-Reserve in the grade of staff sergeant.
I/ Air Force Review Boards Agency
Director
U
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1997-03571A
_______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRRP recommends the application be denied. DPPRRP states that a prudent individual would be obligated to investigate the ramifications of entering into an SSB agreement prior to requesting an SSB in conjunction with early separation. As of this date, this office has not received a response.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NOV 0 41998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01100 HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be restored to the grade of colonel (0-6) and that he be retired in that grade with all appropriate retirement pay retroactive to 1 December 1996. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. They recommend the applicant's request be denied. Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair Mr. Richard A....
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00015
The agreement also addressed that recoupment would occur if, and when, the applicant became eligible for retired pay, so the claims made by the applicant are clearly unfounded when he states that he did not know that his Reserve retired pay would be recouped for the SSB payment. AFPC/DPPRRP noted the applicant has requested an active duty retirement effective on his date of separation on 5 Jun 92. They stated the applicant did not have sufficient active service to request an active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-00912
He had completed a total of 2 years, 3 months and 7 days of service at the time of his discharge from the Army National Guard. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that his pay date of 5 November 1982 must have been the date the Base CBPO was going on when he was told to attend a meeting on the SSB/VSI...
He had completed a total of 2 years, 3 months and 7 days of service at the time of his discharge from the Army National Guard. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that his pay date of 5 November 1982 must have been the date the Base CBPO was going on when he was told to attend a meeting on the SSB/VSI...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1994-02547A
The Senator’s letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Retirement Policies and Programs, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states that although the applicant is quoting 10 U.S.C. (2) Applying for separation under the SSB program (which would result in approximately $59,240). He was never counseled concerning the TERA program or changes in the...
The Senator’s letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Retirement Policies and Programs, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states that although the applicant is quoting 10 U.S.C. (2) Applying for separation under the SSB program (which would result in approximately $59,240). He was never counseled concerning the TERA program or changes in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001033
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant's contentions have been acknowledged; however, the evidence of record shows he was separated under the requested Voluntary Incentive Program with an SSB payment. His request was approved and orders were published on 22 January 1992 separating him from active duty on 21 February 1992 under the...
While serving on active duty, he was promoted to the grade of captain, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 July 1987. In support of his request, he has provided a letter, dated 12 September 1994, documenting his formal application for employment with the National Security Agency (NSA) prior to his date of separation of 18 November 1994. Since the HQ AFMPC/DPMAR policy letter of 30 January 1995 clearly stated that "confirmed employment or formal application pending prior to date...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the information provided by ARPC/DPAR is incorrect or does not apply to him because he was not a member of the Ready Reserves and his name was not removed from the recommended promotion list since his retirement orders show that he has the permanent Reserve grade of lieutenant colonel. A complete copy of applicant's response is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...