RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02878
INDEX CODE: 108
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Item 6. “Nature and Extent of Injury” on the line of Duty
Determination, dated 23 September 1993, be corrected by adding
“Herniated Lumbar Disc Left L4-L5.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
By not transposing (sic) the information from the 22 September 1993
Medical Certificate, AF Form 1971 onto the Line of Duty Determination
(LOD), dated 23 September 1993, he was informed that his back injury
was civilian related. This is incorrect as confirmed by the letter
from the Squadron Commander at Homestead Air Reserve Base. Applicant
had surgery for a left inquinal hernia and subsequent surgery for a
herniated disc. The surgeries occurred concurrently in a two to four
week period and were completely approved following U. S. Air Force
Reserve chain of command.
In support of his application, applicant submits a copy of the AF Form
1971, Medical Certificate, dated 22 September 1993; a copy of the Line
of Duty Determination, AF Form 348, dated 23 September 1993; a copy of
a letter from the Squadron Commander to a Congressman, dated 9 July
1997; and, a copy of a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs,
dated 7 August 1997 reflecting a service connected disability rating.
Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant initially enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 16 March
1984.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR),
Exhibits C and F. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts
in this Record of Proceedings.
On 22 September 1998, applicant was relieved from his current
assignment, assigned to the Retired Reserve Section and placed on the
U. S. Air Force Reserve Retired List effective 23 September 1998 due
to medical disqualification for continued military duty by reason of
“Arteriosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease; Chronic Lower Back Pain
with Neuralgia.” He served 15 years active and inactive duty in the
Air Force Reserve with four (4) years prior active service in the
Regular Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Military Personnel Division, Air Force Reserve Command, HQ
AFRC/DPM, states that there was no medical documentation provided for
Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command, Surgeon General (HQ AFRC/SGPS)
to review previously nor with this request for correction of military
records which supports applicant’s claim that his back problems are
associated with his duty in Germany. Neither medical, nor personnel
authorities from Homestead Air Reserve Base, Florida, have provided
any documentation which would lend support to applicant’s claim.
Absent any documentation supporting applicant that his back problems
are associated with his duty in Germany, they do not recommend his
request to amend the AF Form 348, Line of Duty Determination, be
approved.
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant was forwarded a copy of the Air Force evaluation on
29 December 1997. He submitted a response and indicates that the
Commander, a Brigadier General, concurred in and approved the
documentation and surgical requests for hernia and back injuries
sustained as a line of duty injury.
A copy of the applicant’s response is attached at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed the personnel and medical records
and states that while there seems no doubt that the applicant suffered
from acute incarceration of a recurrent left inguinal hernia during
his active duty annual tour in June 1993, considerable doubt exists as
to the time of onset of his recurrent back problems. With no
recording of pain that could be related to an acute exacerbation of
disc disease starting at the time the groin pain began, it is highly
unlikely that this was a concurrent event. Applicant was not seen by
any military medical provider until after completion of the two-week
tour upon his return to the United States, and reference to the onset
of the back problem not found until sometime in September, some three
(3) months after the back problem allegedly restarted. The
applicant’s claim that the back-related pain might have been masked by
the pain on his incarcerated hernia is conjecture, at best,
particularly since he did not find it necessary to seek medical
attention for several days after the pain began and he had returned to
Florida. The nerves affected by the herniated disc (S4-5) do not
carry sensation from the groin area, so there is no way to connect
that pain to the back problem as a possible symptom.
The Consultant concludes that the inguinal hernia and the herniated
disc problems did not have their onset at the same time or in relation
to the same activity. Therefore, the applicant’s request is not
favorably considered.
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant was forwarded a copy of the additional Air Force evaluation
on 15 March 1999 for review and response. Applicant submitted a copy
of his Air Force Reserve Order, EK-5311, placing him on the retired
list and states that he was retired due to medical reasons.
Applicant’s response, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded that the AF Form 348, Line of Duty Determination, should be
amended by adding “Herniated Lumbar Disc Left L4-L5.” His contentions
are duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force. As stated by the BCMR Medical Consultant after a
review of the medical records, at the time the applicant had groin
pain and subsequent surgery for the left inguinal hernia, there was no
mention of any problem with back pain. There is no recording in the
medical records of pain that could be related to an acute exacerbation
of disc disease starting at the time the groin pain began. The
Medical Consultant also felt that it is highly unlikely that this was
a concurrent event. The onset of the back problem was not found until
some three months after the back problem allegedly restarted. We
therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt
the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either
an error or an injustice. Therefore, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 24 June 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603.
Mr. Henry Romo Jr., Panel Chair
Ms. Sophie A. Clark, Member
Ms. Ann L. Heidig, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/DPM, dated 24 Nov 97.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Dec 97.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 12 Jan 98, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 7 Jan 99.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Mar 99.
Exhibit H. Applicant’s Letter, undated, w/atch.
HENRY ROMO JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02878
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Military Personnel Division, Air Force Reserve Command, HQ AFRC/DPM, states that there was no medical documentation provided for Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command, Surgeon General (HQ AFRC/SGPS) to review previously nor with this request for correction of military records which supports applicant’s claim that his back problems are associated with his duty in Germany. The Consultant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04815
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he was on orders for 167 days, he was diagnosed with a hernia in Feb 2011 and surgery was recommended. Although he received INCAP pay from 1 Apr 2012, he is entitled to a point for each day that he should have been continued on military orders. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 11 Jul 2012.
The bottom line of these various documents apparently is that applicant's 1993 "In Line of Duty" (LOD) injury did not result in disability or warrant disability processing and that his February 1995 "EPTS---LOD not applicable" (not LOD) injury resulted in both his disqualification for further Reserve duty and his ineligibility for disability processing, in accordance with the applicable directives [AFI 36-2910 & AFI 36-32121. SGP determined “the [disquallfvmg] medical condition existed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02998
As noted in the medical opinions provided by the high qualified medical experts, it is not probable that his back injury was not caused by changing a tire, but it is highly probable his back injury was a direct result of flying duties. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states three very qualified doctors have offered their opinion that the back...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05881
The 2003 surgery and disc herniation was not in the line of duty, so she is predisposed for back pain/disc herniation from a pre-existing non-military back injury. On 28 Aug 07, an Informal LOD determination concluded the applicants major depressive disorder related to her back pain was in the line of duty. On 29 Aug 07, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent combined disability rating, based upon the loss of use of both lower extremities. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05881
The 2003 surgery and disc herniation was not in the line of duty, so she is predisposed for back pain/disc herniation from a pre-existing non-military back injury. On 28 Aug 07, an Informal LOD determination concluded the applicants major depressive disorder related to her back pain was in the line of duty. On 29 Aug 07, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent combined disability rating, based upon the loss of use of both lower extremities. The...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02106
Right Inguinal Pain Condition .The treatment record reflected that the CI had a right-sided inguinal hernia repair done in 2005 with a return of painful symptoms in 2006. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05714
His current Air Force (AF) Information Management Tool (IMT)) 131, Application for Transfer to the Retired Reserve, should have reflected that he was medically disqualified to perform his duties and that he was not recommended for reenlistment due to his Line of Duty injury. Although the applicant's more recent testimony suggests that he reportedly experienced chronic recurring back pain and paresthesias of the bilateral upper and lower extremities, there is also evidence that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058582C070421
The resultant pressure of the internal tissue through the gap in the abdominal wall in the groin area is called an inguinal hernia. The NGB denied the applicant’s appeal, stating that a review of the medical records by the NGB Chief Surgeon determined that the applicant’s hernia was a preexisting condition which was probably related to colectomy surgery the applicant underwent in 1986. The OTSG stated that based on the available records, none of the applicant’s subsequent hernias were the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01793
The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. The PEB adjudicated the left groin condition at 10% coded 8730 (neuralgia; ilio-Inguinal nerve) whereas the VA dual coded (inguinal hernia-paralysis of ilio-Inguinal nerve) at 10%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB...