-
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 9 8 - 0 0 4 1 2 DEc 11 m COUNSEL: None
t9%
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
Applicant requests benefits from the Survivor Benefit Program and
her late husband's life insurance policy. Applicant's submission
is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit D.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been sufficiently rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to give
the Board a clear understanding of the issues involved and a
personal appearance, with or without legal counsel, would not
have materially added to that understanding. Therefore, the
request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Mrs. Barbara A.
Westgate, and Ms. Ann L. Heidig considered this application on
2 7 October 1 9 9 8 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statuw, 10, U.9.C. 1552.
P
Pa el Chair
/
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 1 4 9
B. Advisory Opinions
C. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
D. Applicant's Response
.
i
- -
550 C Street West, Suite 14
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4716
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPWCS
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE AIR F O R C E
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
6 April 1998
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records-
REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant, -widow
of TSgt
, has requested information on the status of her husband's life
BASIS FOR REQUEST: The applicant claims the insurance policy was with the
military and closed for reason unknown to her in 1982.
DISCUSSION: Upon receipt of the DD Form 149, Application for Correction of
Military Record, this office contacted the Veterans Affairs Regional Office, and
Insurance Center, in Philadelphia, PA. -informed
us
that there was a National Servicemen's Life Insurance (NSLI) policy until
19 January 1981.
RECOMMENDATjON: Board refer applicant to the Veterans Affairs Regional
Office and Insurance Center, P.O. Box 42954, Philadelphia, PA 19101, 1-800-
41 9-1473, for further information on the NSLI policy.
Q&m%@J3*
RODNEY . OUIMElTE, SM gt, USAF
Chief, Casualty Field Operations
980041 2
.~ ...... . . .
.-
DEPARTMENT O F THE A I R FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S A I R F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBuMR
FROM: HQ AFPCIDPPTR
550 C Street West Ste -l I
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713
SUBJECT Application for Correction of Military Records
Requested Correction: The applicant, widow of the above-named retired member, is
requesting corrective action that would entitle her to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
Basis for Rewest: The applicant claims her husband thought she would automatically
receive his pension upon his death.
Background:
a. Survivors of military retirees may continue to receive a portion of the member‘s
retired pay only if they participated in one of the annuity plans sponsored by the Department of
Defense. There is no legal authority for the Air Force to pay the survivor an annuity if the
member did not choose to provide coverage on the survivor’s behalf.
b. Public Law (PL) 87-381, which established the Retired Serviceman’s Family
Protection Plan (RSFPP), was in effect when the member retired. Members were briefed and
required to make their RSFPP elections before completing 18 years of setvice, but spousal
notification or concurrence was not required.
c. Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established the SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an
18-month enrollment period for retired members to elect SBP coverage. PLs 97-35 and
101-189 later authorized two additional open enrollment periods: 1 Oct 81 - 30 Sep 82 and
1 Apr 92 - 31 Mar 93, respectively. There were no provisions in the law during these
enrollment periods which required the spouse of a retired member to be notified if the member
did not elect coverage.
Facts:
a. Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records indicate the
decedent and applicant were married on 23 Apr 55. Pay records verify that the member
elected child only RSFPP coverage prior to his 1 Sep 65 retirement. RSFPP costs and
coverage terminated effective Dec 76 due to loss of eligible beneficiaries.
b. The decedent failed to elect SBP coverage for the applicant during any of the three
congressionally approved SBP open enrollment periods. During ail open enrollment periods,
members were advised by direct mail of their eligibility to make an election. The enrollment
980041 2
packets, as well as the retiree newsletters published during those time frames (also sent by
direct mail), contained points of contact for members to use to gain additional information. The
enrollment packets were mailed to the member's correspondence address maintained by the
Air Force Accounting and Finance Center (AFAFC), the address at which the applicant
continues to reside. Records indicate the decedent submitted an election to decline coverage
in the SBP during the Plan's initial enrollment period and there is no record he returned an
election form during the other two enrollment periods. He died on 3 Nov 96.
Discussion: SBP is similar to commercial life insurance in that an individual must elect
to participate and pay the associated premiums in order to have coverage. It would be
inequitable to those members who chose to participate when eligible and subsequently
received reduced retired pay, and to other widows whose sponsors chose not to participate, to
provide entitlement to this widow on the basis of the evidence presented.
Recommendation: There is no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice in this case
and we recommend the requested relief be denied. However, if the decision is to grant relief,
the decedent's record should be corrected to show on 21 Sep 72 he made an SBP election for
spouse only coverage based on full retired pay. Approval should be contingent upon the
recoupment of premiums the decedent would have paid if he had made the election at that
time.
@&Q&
PAT PEEK, DAFC
Chief, Retiree Services Branch
Directorate Pers Prog Management
980041 2
- . . . . . . . . .
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). d. There were no provisions in the laws during these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify spouses of retired members if the member did not enroll. However, if the decision of the Board is to grant relief, the decedent's record should be corrected to show on 21 Sep 72 he made an SBP election for spouse...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-03355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AUG 2 i Applicant requests that her late husband's records be corrected to reflect that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). c. There were no provisions in...
He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 1992 open enrollment. However, spouse premiums could be terminated following divorce if the member additionally selected Option 4. He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 92 open enrollment.
There were no provisions in the laws during these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify spouses of retired members if the member did not enroll. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters mailed to the decedent during the 1981 - 1982 and 1992 - 1993 open enrollment periods were mailed to the decedent’s address...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00953
Subsequently, Public Laws (PLs) 97-35, 101-189, and 105-261 authorized additional SBP open enrollment periods (1 Oct 81 – 30 Sep 82, 1 Apr 92 – 31 Mar 93, and 1 Mar 99 – 29 Feb 00, respectively) so that retirees could elect or increase SBP coverage. Similarly, the Air Force may not pay an SBP annuity to the applicant, because the member retired before the implementation of the SBP and he did not choose to provide SBP coverage for her when he was eligible to do so. Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01439
Had the member elected SBP coverage based on full retired pay, the monthly cost would have been approximately $157 at the time of his death and the annuity would have been no less than $1,335. Furthermore, the Air Force may not pay an SBP annuity to the applicant because the member retired before the implementation of the SBP and he did not choose to provide SBP coverage on her behalf. It is possible that since the premiums were still being deducted from the member’s retired pay after the...
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air be corrected to - MOND H. WELLER Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUN 3 0 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00024 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the...
The evidence also establishes the deceased member’s efforts to provide the applicant with all the benefits she was entitled to as the spouse of a retired service member. Microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters were mailed to the address the decedent provided to the finance center during the 1981-1982 and 1992-1993 open enrollment periods. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00568
Prior to the servicemember’s 1 October 1963 retirement, he was married and elected spouse and child RSFPP coverage, Option 4 - that allowed the member to terminate RSFPP premium payments in the event the beneficiary lost eligibility. We find no evidence he attempted to elect SBP coverage for the applicant during any of the four open enrollment periods provide by law. Regardless, it appears the servicemember made no attempt to elect SBP coverage for the applicant when he was eligible during...
An AFAFC letter to the decedent, dated 7 October 1972, explained that SBP coverage had been established on his spouse's behalf in compliance with the provision of the law that required establishment of maximum spouse and child coverage if a member, such as the applicant, made no election before retirement. Documents provided by the applicant include a copy of a 7 Oct 72 letter to the decedent from the Air Force Accounting and Finance Center (AFAFC) which explained SBP coverage had been...