Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703806
Original file (9703806.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
-7 

.  -  ..... 

..... 

~ 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AUG  1 4  

IN THE MATTER QF: 

DOCKET NO:  97-03806 

COUNSEL:  NONE 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant  requests that  his  discharge  order,  issued by  the Air 
Force Reserve, be  amended  to  correct his  service number  and  to 
show he was promoted to sergeant.  It was noted that applicant's 
service  number  will  be  administratively  corrected  by  the 
respective Air Force office; therefore, no action is required by 
this Board.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 

The  appropriate Air  Force  office  evaluated  applicant's  request 
and provided  an advisory  opinion to  the  Board  recommending the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit C). 
The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and  response  (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available  evidence  of  record, we  find  insufficient evidence  of 
error  or  injustice to warrant  corrective  action concerning his 
grade at the time of discharge.  The facts and opinions stated in 
the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record 
and  have  not  been  rebutted  by  applicant. 
Absent  persuasive 
evidence  applicant  was  denied  rights  to  which  entitled, 
appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or  appropriate 
standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to  disturb  the 
existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members  of  the  Board  Mr.  Thomas  S. Markiewicz,  Mr.  Jackson A. 
Hauslein, and Mr. Michael P. Higgins considered this application 
on  9  July  1998 in accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force 
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. 

C S . ? M :

Panel Chair 
:

- 7  

Exhibits: 

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D.  SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 

, 

DEPARTMENT OF  THE  AIR  FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS  AIR  RESERVE  PERSONNEL  CENTER 

0 2  Ap2  $&fj 

MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 

1535 Command Dr EE Wing 3rd Floor 
Andrews AFB MD 2033 1-7002 

FROM: HQ ARPC/DP 

6760 E Irvington PI #1500 
Denver CO 80280-1500 

- 

SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records, 

1 . The requested correction cannot be accomplished administratively at this headquarters. 

2. The applicant requests his discharge order be amended to correct his service number and to show he 
was promoted to  Sergeant. 

3.  The following is an analysis of the case: 

a. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 4 Dec 50 for physical disqualification, 

with no active service as a reservist per AF Reserve Order 261, dated 6 Dec 50. This order lists his 
service number as AF65000045 and a rank of Corporal. He states that the quartermaster gave him his 
insignia and he had been upgraded to sergeant. 

b. The applicant’s service number was incorrect on his discharge order and should have read AF 

56000045. However, there are no documents in the applicant’s records indicating he was promoted to 
Sergeant. 

I 

4.  Recommend the applicant’s request to have the grade on his discharge certificate amended to read 
Sergeant be denied. There are no documents in his records indicating he was promoted to sergeant. The 
applicant’s request to have his service number corrected on his discharge order can be accomplished. 
However, we are not authorized to make the correction since the order was originally published by 
HQ 4th AF. We will forward the applicant’s request and supporting documents to 4th AF to have the 
order amended, 

5 .  
e- 

- 

Q ARPCDPAD, at DSN 

Colonel, USAF 
Program Management 

9703806 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02838

    Original file (BC-2003-02838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of applicant’s appeal, he submitted a personal statement; an email, dated 19 May 03, from his military personnel flight to 4th AF/DPM concerning contractual errors; Reserve Order P- 045 reflecting promotion to staff sergeant, effective 1 Jul 91; copies of a 1 Sep 91 training certificate, a Report of Individual Personnel (RIP), dated 31 Jul 91, and a DD Form 2AF (Reserve) ID Card issued 17 Aug 91, all reflecting the rank of staff sergeant; copies of DD Form 214, Certificate of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00361

    Original file (BC-2005-00361.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He reported for duty and performed a weekend duty trip that was not reflected on his point summary. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on the evidence of record and that verified by HQ Air Force Reserve Command (HQ AFRC), it appears the applicant has received credit for all participation performed during the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 17 Jan 01.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802290

    Original file (9802290.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 9 September 1997, the applicant wrote to the 39th Wing IG alleging he had experienced reprisal by his squadron commander for giving a protected statement to an IG investigator during a separate IG investigation on 15 and 19 July 1997. The applicant alleged the squadron commander withheld a senior rater endorsement to [the EPR in question]. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103373

    Original file (0103373.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 Feb 91, he enlisted in the Washington Air National Guard (ANG); he transferred to the Air Force Reserve on 10 Dec 92. On 19 Feb 95, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve with a General discharge by reason of Defective Enlistment – Fraudulent Entry. On 5 Jul 94, HQ AFRES/CV approved the findings and recommendations and the case file was forwarded to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) for a determination as to whether the applicant should receive Lengthy Service Probation (LSP).

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9703257

    Original file (9703257.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03257

    Original file (BC-1997-03257.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9305944

    Original file (9305944.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the alternative: He be reconsidered for promotion by the FY 1990 Air Force Reserve General Officer Selection Board in which any reference in the candidates’ Forms 707A, Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs) which state that the candidate is in the top X% of officers (where X is a number between one and one hundred) is deleted, with special instructions that no candidate will be discriminated against because of corrections to the record or due to being a navigator; with the exception of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-05944

    Original file (BC-1993-05944.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the alternative: He be reconsidered for promotion by the FY 1990 Air Force Reserve General Officer Selection Board in which any reference in the candidates’ Forms 707A, Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs) which state that the candidate is in the top X% of officers (where X is a number between one and one hundred) is deleted, with special instructions that no candidate will be discriminated against because of corrections to the record or due to being a navigator; with the exception of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02073

    Original file (BC-2006-02073.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02073 INDEX CODE: 110.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jan 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Extended Active Duty (EAD) date be changed from 25 Oct 05 to 11 Aug 05 to prevent a break in service, restore her promotion line number, and clear a debt for back pay and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219

    Original file (BC-2003-02219.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).