COUNSEL: NONE -
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKZT NUMBER: 97-03527
EIEARING: NO
The applicant requests his records be corrected to reflect t h e
entered the Air Force :n the grade of airmafi first class (E-3
raLher than airman basic ( X - 1 .
Applicant's submission is at_
Exhibit Fi.
The appropriate Air Force offlce evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D1.
Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideratior of applicant's request and the
s-vzilab>e evidence ~5 z - e c c ~ c , ;hie 51nd insufficient evidence .=f
efi-rax- 311 irilustice tc warranr- corrective action. The facts ari5
opinions stated. in the advisory cpinion appear to be based or. t h e
evidence of record and have Tist been adequately rebutted x>y
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicar,t was d e n l e d
r i g h t s L O which enr_itied, appropriate regulations were not
foiiowea, or appropriar_e standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record. Accordingly, applicart's
request is denied.
-
T h e Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant Should also x>e informed Lnat this decision is final a r d
will only be reconsidered upori tne presenEation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasor,ably available at the tine the
application was flied.
Members of the Board, Mr. LeRoy T. Baseman, Mr. Gregory H.
Petkoff, and Mr. Patrick R. Wheelex- considered this application
on 2 July 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the qoverning statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552-
f
1
LEROY T. BASEMAN
Panel Chair
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B . Available Master Personnel Records
2 . ,ridvisory Opinion
9. AFBCYIR Ltr Forwarding Adviscx-y Cpinion
2 . Applicant's Response
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C l . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). _- T h e Board staff is directed to i n f c ~ r n applicant of chis decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion t 3 the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, .w.e find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
- AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-03505 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests her rank to master sergeant, made during a 95E7 supplemental board, be reinstated. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions LeROY T. BASEMAN Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS DEC 0 4 I997 U.S. AIR FORCE B 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West...
I L. e AFBCMR 93-01781 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F MILITARY RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20330-1430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Regulation 31-3, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent Force relating to show that he enr Scholarship...
discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Zxhibit E. a After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, including the investigative report, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant has provided no information from the evaluators on either of the contested reports. It appears the contested report was accomplished in direct accordance with Air Force policy in effect at the time it was rendered.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Applicant? The appropriate Air Force off ices evaluated applicant I s request and provided advisory oplnions to the Board recommending the application be deniec (Exhibit C). The advisory opir2ions were forwarded to the applicart for review and response (Exhibit D1.