A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD O F P?.3CEEDINGS
EBU& Q$J
IN THE MATTER OF:
DCIZKET NUMBER: 97-03167
COLWSEL : NONE
HEARING: NO
The applicant requests that his promotion service date (PSD) t o
the grade of first lieutenant be changed from 1 October 1997 t o
14 September 1 9 9 7 . Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C l .
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration sf applicant's req'Jest and t h e
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory cpl-nion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have n o z been adequately rebutted by
Absent persuasive e~.-idence applicant was denied
appiicant.
rights to which entitled, app-oFi-iate regulations were riot
followed, or appropriate standards >:ere not applied, we finc r A G
basis to disturb the existing rec=T-d. Accordingly, applicant's
request is denied.
_-
T h e Board staff is directed to i n f c ~ r n applicant of chis decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon tr-2 presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonakl;T available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. L e R o l -
TT. Baseman, Mr. Gregory H.
and Mr. Patrick I?. WheelE:lr considered this applicatior-
Petkoff
on C JuI-y 1998 in accordance wk:-- the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 35-2603, and the gove-:--;q statute, 10, U . S . C . 1332.
I
LEROY T. BASEMAN
?ane 1. Cj-Lz 1 r
\
A. Applicant's DD Forr, 149
B . Available Master Personnei Eiecc-ds
C. A d v i s o r y Opinion
D . AFBCMR L t l r Forwardinq kavi SOY-,'
\)p;nion
discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.
4 L AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECOR3 3F PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97--03429 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING: NO The applicant requests that the award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal be added to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Cischarge. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opin,on to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit T I . The advisory opinion...
The appropriate Air Force offlce evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D1. Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideratior of applicant's request and the s-vzilab>e evidence ~5 z - e c c ~ c , ;hie 51nd insufficient evidence .=f efi-rax- 311 irilustice tc warranr-...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion t 3 the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, .w.e find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
I L. e AFBCMR 93-01781 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F MILITARY RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20330-1430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Regulation 31-3, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent Force relating to show that he enr Scholarship...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant has provided no information from the evaluators on either of the contested reports. It appears the contested report was accomplished in direct accordance with Air Force policy in effect at the time it was rendered.
Applicact's s u b x i s s i o ~ is at Exhibit Ti. The appropriate Air Force off;re evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory o p i n i o r . Appiicant's resporse to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. l2ursuar.t ts the 2 o a r d ' s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigatlon, Washington, D .
The appropriate Air Force o f f i c e evaluated applicarit ‘ s request ana provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . T r. 0 additional evaluation was forwarded to applicant f c r re-Jie+; ar,d comment (Exhibit G ’ i . Applicant’s response to the additional evaluation is at Exhibit H. The appropriate After careful consiaeratio~ cf applicant's r e q u e...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions LeROY T. BASEMAN Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS DEC 0 4 I997 U.S. AIR FORCE B 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...