Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703505
Original file (9703505.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
- 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE  MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NO:  97-03505 

COUNSEL:  None 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant requests her rank to master sergeant, made during a 95E7 
supplemental board, be  reinstated.  Applicant's submission is at 
Exhibit A. 

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and 
provided  an  advisory  opinion  to  the  Board  recommending  the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit C) . 
The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded. to  the  applicant  for  review  and  response  (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

After.  careful  consideratlon  of  applicant's  request  and  t h e  
available  evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of 
error or  injustice to warrant  corrective action.  The  facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  riot  been  rebutted  by  applicant. 
Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied  rights  to which 
entitled,  approprlate  reguiatlons  were  not  followed,  or 
appropriate  standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to 
disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decisiori i s  final and 
will  only  be  reconsidered upon  the  presentation  of  new  relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members of the Board Mr. LeRoy T. Baseman, Mr. Gregclry H. Petkoff 
and Mr. 
I998  in  accordance with  t h e   provlslons  of  Air  Force  I n s t r u c t i o r !  
36-2603 and the governmg statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552. 

Wheeler considered  this application on 2 3~1'~' 

Patrick R. 

A 

LEROY T. BASEMAN 
Panel Chair 

Zxhibits : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form  149 
B.  Available Master P e r s o n n e l   Records 
C .   Advisory Opinion 
D .   AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703527

    Original file (9703527.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offlce evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D1. Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideratior of applicant's request and the s-vzilab>e evidence ~5 z - e c c ~ c , ;hie 51nd insufficient evidence .=f efi-rax- 311 irilustice tc warranr-...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703167

    Original file (9703167.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C l . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). _- T h e Board staff is directed to i n f c ~ r n applicant of chis decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703492

    Original file (9703492.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703344

    Original file (9703344.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions LeROY T. BASEMAN Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS DEC 0 4 I997 U.S. AIR FORCE B 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703114

    Original file (9703114.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion t 3 the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, .w.e find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702681

    Original file (9702681.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant has provided no information from the evaluators on either of the contested reports. It appears the contested report was accomplished in direct accordance with Air Force policy in effect at the time it was rendered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703678

    Original file (9703678.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not+ followed-,- or- appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703432

    Original file (9703432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed tc inform applicant of this decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702281

    Original file (9702281.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Zxhibit E. a After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, including the investigative report, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800052

    Original file (9800052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.