ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01735
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
.
AUG 1 0 \%%
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
(By amendment to his original application) The requirement that he
complete 18 months of mandatory On-The-Job Training (OJT) be waived
and he be permitted to obtain the Career Development Courses (CDCs)
which he must complete in order to be awarded a 7-skill level in
his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
As a result of the earlier consideration of his application, on
10 September 1997, it was directed that the effective date and date
of rank for his promotion to the grade of staff sergeant be
backdated from 1 May 1997 to 16 February 1996. Based on this
correction to the records, his supervisors began to prepare him for
award of his v-skill level, which is a requirement for promotion to
technical sergeant.
He was awarded the Information Management AFSC due to his past
military experience. He did not have to attend formal training.
Six months into his CDC training, he was told there was no longer a
test for award of the 5-skill level and that he would be awarded
that skill level on an OJT basis. He assumed that his 7-level
training had begun at that time, as did his supervisors, and that,
when the correction to his promotion dates was approved, the
mandatory 18 months of OJT training would be backdated also. After
being notified that his request for changes to his promotion dates
had been approved, he reported to the training office. Both he and
his superiors were told that the 18-month requirement would not be
waived.
He is asking the Board to again evaluate the facts and
circumstances of his case, and, his qualifications. He believes he
has done all of the required training.
In support of his amended request, the applicant provided a copy of
his Classification/On-the-Job Training Actions, dated 29 September
1997 (see Exhibit A).
RESUME OF THE CASE:
On 29 May 1997, the applicant requested that his effective date and
date of rank for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant be
changed. The Board considered the application and concurred with
the recommendation of ANG/MPPU that the applicant's request should
be favorably considered (Exhibit B).
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a member of the Air National Guard who is
currently serving on a statutory tour of active duty. His most
recent enlistment was in the Air National Guard on 16 January 1996
in the grade of senior airman (E-4) for a period 6 years. He was
credited with prior service in the Army National Guard, the Air
National Guard, the Regular Army, and the Army Reserve, during
which time, he performed duties as a cavalry scout,
security/military policeman, and M-1 Abrams armor crewman. His
paydate is 9 June 1980.
As of the Retirement Year Ending
15 January 1998, he was credited with 13 years, 7 months and 28
days of satisfactory Federal service and approximately 9 years, 7
months and 9 days of total active Federal military service.
Following his most recent enlistment in the Air National Guard, on
1 August 1996, the applicant was relieved from his assignment as a
Law Enforcement Specialist (Duty AFSC 3P051), and, was ordered to
active duty for a period of 48 months per 10 USC 12301(d) and
assigned to duties as an Information Management Technician (Duty
AFSC 3A071). On 29 September 1997, he was awarded the 5-skill
level in AFSC 3AOX1, effective 1 March 1997. He was promoted to
the grade of staff sergeant on 1 May 1997. His promotion dates to
staff sergeant were subsequently changed to 16 February 1996.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Utilization Branch, ANG/MPPU, reviewed the applicant's
amended request and recommended denial.
MPPU provided an
assessment by a Training Manager in which it was indicated the
Career Field Manager waived the mandatory 3-level technical school
at the time the applicant was assigned to the position he currently
holds. The applicant was enrolled in the 5-level CDC, however, he
was disenrolled based on pass/fail rate statistics provided by ECI.
Supervisors were advised that they must provide subject knowledge
training and document a training plan. After several changes of
supervision, a new supervisor documented the training and requested
5-skill level upgrade which was backdated to 1 March 1997;
reflecting the actual date the applicant completed 5-level
training. The applicant and his supervisor then met with the
Training Manager to discuss the waiver of the 7-skill level time
2
AFBCMR 97-01735
.
-
*
requirements that would coincide with promotion opportunities. The
Training Manager denied this request based on the lack of formal
training.
Although the 7-skill level focuses on the managerial aspects of an
AFSC, there are critical tasks the trainee must know and perform to
be effective. The Training Manager is of the opinion that waiving
another mandatory training requirement would be detrimental to the
individual's career and the organization.
MPPU agreed with this assessment and indicated that it is
imperative that the ANG train to the same standards as their Air
Force counterparts. Completion of mandatory operational training
and time-in-training requirements ensures trainees are trained on
all aspects of their career field for career progression.
A complete copy of the foregoing evaluations is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the foregoing advisory opinions was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 March 1998 f o r review and comment. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable injustice.
The applicant's current
request should be approved as a continuation of the previously-
approved relief. Had the errors in the applicant's dates of rank
not occurred, he would have entered 7-skill level training at an
earlier date.
It is unclear when this would have occurred.
Nevertheless, we believe that to mandate the 18-month requirement
in spite of the retroactive changes in the record would constitute
a continuation of the injustice resulting from the error which
occurred when his promotion to staff sergeant was delayed. Even if
the 18-month OJT rule is waived, the applicant will still be
required to complete his CDCs and obtain his supervisor's approval
prior to being upgraded to his 7-skill level. These requirements
are, in our estimation, sufficient to safeguard the best interests
of the service and the applicant. Accordingly, the his records
should be corrected in the following manner.
3
AFBCMR 97-01735
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority
approved a waiver of the 18-month On-The-Job (OJT) training
requirement set forth in AFI 36-2101, Table 3.7, Rule 4, for award
of a 7-skill level in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 3AOX1.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 18 June 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603 :
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. John T. Dorsett, Member
Mr. Steven A. Shaw, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.
following documentary evidence was considered:
The
Exhibit A. Letter from the applicant, undated, with
Exhibit B. Record of Proceedings, AFBCMR 97-01735, dated
attachments.
10 September 1997, with attachments.
attachment.
Exhibit C. Letter, ANG/MPPU, dated 3 March 1998, with
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 25 March 1998.
b H A R L E S E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
4
AFBCMR 97-01735
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF'BCMR 97-01735
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
ilitan, records of the Department of the Air Force relating t
, be corrected to show that competent authority approved
18-month On-The-Job (OJT) training requirement set forth in AFI 36-2101, Table 3.7, Rule 4, for
award of a 7-skill level in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 3AOX1.
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01621
After she filed a complaint through the Air National Guard Inspector General’s Office (ANG/IG) concerning abuse of authority by ANG/OM, the LOR was removed from her records. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the Chief of Organizational Support, Air National Guard Readiness Center, the applicant, while serving in the Maryland ANG on a Title 10 United States Code active duty tour, received an LOR on 8 October 2002 for twice...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03952
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his DD Form 214, his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, and an AF Form 2096, Classification/On-The-Job Training Action. He was serving in the grade of staff sergeant and had served 7 years, 11 months, and 8 days at the time of his separation. Further, and notwithstanding his inclusion of an AF Form 2096 indicating his AFSC at the 7-level, his discharge package reveals he was...
She states that her rater based his evaluation of her duty performance on an isolated part of the rating period; and the contested report is based on the last 120 days of the 20 month reporting period. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 December 1998 for review and response within 30...
It appears to DAS that MPPU is recommending the applicant be promoted to captain effective 15 May 1993, prior to his appointment in the Air Force Reserve. Upon completion of the Medical Diploma (MD), a reappointment application must be completed and submitted to ANG/DPPS in accordance with AFI 36-2005, Appointment in Commissioned Grades and Designation and Assignment in Professional Categories - Reserve of the Air Force and United States Air Force. A review of his state records revealed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02908
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02908 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 2T211, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) be removed from his military personnel records. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K states in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2101,...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-01 102 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: the Departmencof the Air Force relating d to show that, on 2 March 1996, he enli aiman basic (E-l), with an effective date and a date of rank of 2 March...
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01814A
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00503 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to indicate he received a 5-skill level in his Air Force Specialty (AFS) and that his pay grade be changed to senior airman (SRA/E-4). DPPPWB states that although he met the time in grade and time in service...