c
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 96-00978
3AND5 7999
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
RESUME OF CASE:
On 13 February 1997, the Board considered and denied applicant's
request to have his records reflect POW status. The applicant's
aircraft had been forced down over Yugoslavia while on a mission
from Germany on 19 November 1951. He was interned in Hungary,
interrogated, and returned to US military control on 28 December
1951. The applicant retired in 1968 in the grade of lieutenant
colonel. In his appeal, he contended the VA would not provide
medical treatment because he was not on the POW list.
A copy of the Record of Proceedings, with Exhibits, is at
Exhibit F.
In an undated cover note, Representative Solomon forwarded
applicant's 14 June 1998 letter, which includes a copy of a 1952
Life magazine interview, and requested reconsideration for his
constituent.
A copy of the Representative's letter, with attachments, is at
Exhibit H.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After careful
consideration, we are persuaded that the circumstances of this
particular case warrant awarding the applicant POW status for the
period from 19 November 1951, when his aircraft was forced down,
to 28 December 1951, when he was returned to US military control.
We therefore recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was a
Prisoner of War from 19 November 1951 to 28 December 1951.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 November 1998, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Panel Chair
Mr. Loren S. Perlstein, Member
Mr. William E . Edwards, Member
A11 members voted to correct the records,
following documentary evidence was considered:
as recommended. The
Exhibit F.
Exhibit G.
Record of Proceedings, dated 4 Apr 97, w/atchs.
Representative's Letter, undated, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
-
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 96-00978
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A
Stat 116), it is directed that:
records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
corrected to show that he was a Prisoner of War from
Air Force Review Boards Agency
.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
rn - 4 '997
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 96-00978 -
- a
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
- . .
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214 be annotated to reflect that he was a Prisoner of
War (POW) from 19 November to 29 December 1951.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The C - 4 7 aircraft in which he was the co-pilot was forced down by
Russian MIGs. The airplane landed at a Russian Air Force Base in
Hungary. He was interrogated by Russians and kept in solitary
confinement. He says the Veterans Administration (VA) will not
provide medical treatment because he is not on the POW list.
In support of his contentions, the applicant provides orders
moving him to Germany and back to the United States for the time
frame in question, and copies of telegrams advising his parents
of his missing status and his release from Hungarian authorities
to US military control. He also provides a letter from the VA
advising him of expanded benefits accorded to former POWs.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
By Special Orders Number 149, dated 11 July 1949, applicant
ordered to Erding Air Force Depot, Germany. On 19 November 1
while co-piloting a C-47 aircraft from Erding, Germany,
Belgrade, Yugoslavia, applicant and three other crew members
forced down. The AFHQ Form 0-529 (Casualty Report) d
2 January 1952, confirms that applicant was missing
19 November 1951, was interned in Hungary on 4 December 1951,
was returned to US military control on 28 December 1951.
Special Orders Number 190, dated 29 December 1951, applicant
ordered back to the US.
was
.951,
to
were
.ated
on
and
BY
was
He retired in the grade of lieutenant colonel on 1 September
1968. He served a total of 27 years, 10 months and 28 days in the
military services.
.
..
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Missing Persons Branch, AFPC/DPWCM, reviewed this application
and provides the criteria for determining POW status as outlined
in Title 3 8 , USC, Section l O l ( 3 2 ) . They recommend denial because
the applicant was not interned during a period of warand there
is no documentation that he was mistreated during his internment.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the evaluation and responded that Russian
MIGs fired tracer rounds across the nose of the C-47 aircraft.
After landing, the crew was immediately taken into custody and
separated. He was interrogated night and day by Russian officers
in uniform, then turned over to the Hungarians and interrogated
again.
calls this mistreatment and wonders if the Air Force is so young
He
it is not familiar with the term Ilcold War."
He was held in solitary confinement for 40 days.
Applicant's complete rebuttal is attached at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After
a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's
submission, we are not persuaded that his DD Form 214 should
reflect POW status from 19 November to 29 December 1951.
Applicant's contentions are duly noted. However, we do not find
these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive
to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. We therefore
agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered
either an error or an injustice.
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
Therefore, we find no
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material e r r o r o r
injustice; that the application was denied without a prsonal
2
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 13 February 1997, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
.
.
Mr. Martin H. Rogers, Panel Chairman
Mr. William E. Edwards Member
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Member
Ms. D. E. Hankey, Examiner (without vote)
The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A'.
Exhibit B .
Exhibit C .
Exhibit D.
Exhibit E.
DD Form 149, dated 6 Apr 96, w/atchs.
Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Letter, HQ AFPC/DPWCM, dated 7 May 96.
Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 May 96.
Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Jun 96, w/atch.
Panel Chairman
3
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00520
On 25 January 1980, the applicant submitted an application requesting that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of captain in November 1943; and that he received Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for flying more than 25 missions during the period in question. This evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 October 2003, a copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03812
The applicant does not provide medical documentation or any eye witness statements verifying that his injury was a result of combat action with the enemy. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03684
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPWCM recommends the applicant’s request for award of the POW Medal be denied. On 22 October 1944, he provided the information that immediately after being shot down, he was picked up by partisans, evading capture by the enemy. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded he should be awarded the PH, DFC, and POW Medal.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03799
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant's available military personnel records indicate that he was appointed a second lieutenant, Army of the United States (Air Corps) and entered on active duty on 3 Nov 43. Holland was neutral. SAF/GCI indicated that the instant case involves Holland, a belligerent country, that was occupied by enemy forces at the time of the applicant’s internment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006013
The applicant provides: * 4 letters from governmental agencies * 4 Western Union telegrams * a Time Magazine article * printout from the Seaboard and Western/Seaboard World Airlines webpage * newspaper article * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: a. In order to be granted POW status, a declaration...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01826
In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, Congressional correspondence, recommendations from his former commander/Director of Combat Operations Fifth Air Force, narrative recommendations, proposed citations, a statement from his wingman on the 28 June 1952 mission, extracts from his personal copies of his military records to include flight records, mission reports, a copy of the only other DSC awarded in the wing, translated Russian mission reports for...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). For the Korean War, the Air Force Historical Research Agency requires a Far East Air Forces (FEAF) general order, or documentation on which such an order would be based, to confirm official award of an aerial...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00885
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00885 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The credit for a Mikoyan-Gurevich (MiG-15) “Probably Destroyed” in aerial combat in Korea on 21 September 1952, be upgraded to a “Confirmed Destroyed.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
While receiving treatment, he was informed that he was to receive the PH Medal for service-connected injuries at the hands of the enemy. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. 2 AFBCMR 96-03428 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated that he is extremely disappointed in DPPPRA' s recommendation to deny his application. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Feb 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00806
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00806 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He states his...