AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 96-03428
+
HEARING DESIRED: No
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is entitled to the award of the PH as a result of injuries he
received during his six-month captivity as a Prisoner of War
(POW) of the Germans. On 17 Dec 44, he was a second lieutenant
assigned to the 461St Bomb Group flying out of Italy as a B-24
pilot. On that date, he was shot down by enemy fighters and
anti-aircraft flack over Trench, Czechoslovakia. He bailed out
and was captured by local troops and then turned over to the SS
for interrogation. He was taken to a barn at SS Headquarters and
was subjected to a severe interrogation. As a result of a
beating, he received severe .injuries to his teeth and jaw. He
was then transported to Stalag Luft 1 where he remained until his
repatriation in Apr 45 and then returned to France for
rehabilitation. While receiving treatment, he was informed that
he was to receive the PH Medal for service-connected injuries at
the hands of the enemy. He was returned to the United States in
Jun 45 and has never received the PH.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Army/Air Corps of the United States
on 3 Sep 42 in the grade of private.
Medical documentation
reflects that on 5 Jul 43, the applicant was admitted to the
hospital in Nashville, Tennessee, for a rupture (traumatic,
moderately severe), and accidentally incurred an injury on 28 Apr
43 to his left knee when he was a cadet and fell down stairs.
AFBCMR 96-03428
On 9 Feb 45, a letter was forwarded to the applicant’s wife
indicating that he was reported by the Adjutant General as
missing in action over Germany since 17 Dec 44.
The letter
indicated that the applicant was a pilot of a B-24 (Liberator)
bomber which departed from Italy on a combat mission to Germany
on 17 Dec 44.
The report revealed that during this mission
en route to the target, a radio message was received from
applicant’s bomber stating that the plane was in difficulty.
Shortly afterwards, the applicant‘s aircraft was observed to
leave the formation and disappeared from sight.
On 19 Jun 45, the War Department issued a telegram to the
applicant’s wife indicating that the applicant was being returned
to the United States and returned to military control within the
near future and would be given an opportunity to communicate with
her upon arrival.
Applicant was discharged from active duty on 17 Dec 45 in the
grade of second lieutenant under the provisions of Reserve
Regulation 1-5 (Convenience of the Government) and transferred to
the Air Force Reserves. He was honorably discharged from the Air
Force Reserve on 27 Sep 65 in the grade of captain.
A Veterans Affairs (VA) rating, dated 30 Mar 92, reflects that
applicant is receiving 20% disability for affective disorder,
bipolar (10%) and residuals, arthrotomy, left knee (10%) .
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Noncommissioned Officer in Charge (NCOIC) , PH Review Board,
AFPC/DPPPRA, reviewed this application and indicated that, to be
awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he
was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have
received medical treatment by medical personnel.
Applicant’s
records and his statement reflect he was captured and held as a
POW. Medical documents recorded do not support his claim. VA
medical documentation reflect what the applicant has reported to
them.
He did not have any eyewitnesses to substantiate his
claim. His records have been reviewed by the PH Review Board
(PHRB) consisting of review by a senior master sergeant, chief
master sergeant, major and the reviewing authority in the grade
of colonel. The PHRB determined on 2 Feb 98 that the applicant
did not have sufficient evidence to approve award of the PH.
With the above information, DPPPRA must recommend denial of the
applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit C.
2
AFBCMR 96-03428
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated
that he is extremely disappointed in DPPPRA' s recommendation to
deny his application. He does not believe his statement was
given the proper consideration by the reviewing board. While
there were no witnesses available to document his claim,
everything he indicated did in fact happen. He also feels that
the provisions of Section 521 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) , which extended the eligibility for the
award of the PH to former POWs that were held prior to 25 Apr 62
and suffered injuries at the hands of their captors, has not been
complied with.
Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
Although the applicant has not substantiated that the wounds he
received as a result of being a POW were medically treated at the
time they were incurred, we find medical treatment was an
impossibility due to the circumstances of his being incarcerated.
We do believe, however, that he suffered injuries at the hands of
his captors. Therefore, in order to offset any possibility of an
injustice, we are persuaded that the applicant is deserving of
the award of the PH in accordance with the provisions of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 1996.
In view of the
foregoing, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
.
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded
the PH for wounds as a result of being a POW during the period
17 Dec 44 through Apr 45.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 5 November 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
3
6
AFBCMR 96-03428
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 May 95, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records..
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPRA, dated 3 Feb 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Feb 98.
Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant, dated 10 Mar 98.
-1
Chair
I
.
4
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 96-03428
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A
Stat 116), it is directed that:
records of the Department of the Air Force relating t
orrected to show that he was awarded the Purple He&-
risoner of War (POW) during the period 17 December 1944 through April
1945.
I Air Force Review Boards Agency
.
i .-
He should be awarded the PH based on wounds he received when his aircraft was hit by enemy flak while on a bombing mission to Berlin, Germany, during World War 11. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (Le., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). The applicant's former aircrew members have provided statements indicating that the applicant was wounded when their aircraft was hit by enemy flak and...
The applicant has not provided any documentation showing that he received medical treatment for either injury and there is no documentation in his medical file mentioning either of these injuries. Therefore, we conclude that any doubt should be resolved in this applicant’s favor and recommend he be awarded the PH for injuries sustained after bailing out of his B-24 bomber on 9 Feb 45. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 31 Jul 02, w/atchs.
The applicant’s case file reveals that the Director, Personnel Accountability, HQ AFPC/DPW, requested the applicant’s discharge document be corrected to reflect he was a POW from 22 Feb 45 to 29 Apr 45. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Recognition Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, stated that the applicant’s request for award of the Purple Heart (PH) medal was forwarded to the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) on 4 Jan 00. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01321
While the applicant has provided a detailed account of how the injury occurred, he has not provided an eyewitness statement or medical documentation substantiating the injury was received and treated. In order to present a request to the PH Review Board, a detailed personal account of the circumstances surrounding the injury, medical documentation to substantiate medical treatment was received and if possible, an eyewitness account from an individual who saw the applicant injured. THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01640
AR 600-45.C4 permits award of the PH for frostbite for personnel actually engaged in combat. PL 104-106, dated 10 Feb 96, entitled former POWs to receive a PH for wounds suffered as a POW. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal, for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01675
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for an injury he sustained when his aircraft was shot down on 4 Aug 44, and any other awards to which he may be entitled. His available records reflect he enlisted in the Army on...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03253
Counsel provides, among other documents, the Group History of HQ 40th Bombardment Group (40BG) recounting the Japanese air raid on 25 Dec 44; the applicant’s sworn affidavit; a 1982 statement from the flight surgeon assigned to the 25th Bombardment Squadron (25BS), 40BG, in India describing his treatment of the applicant’s knee injury; a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) advising the applicant’s service records could not be found and were likely lost in the 1973 fire;...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03522
On 5 Mar 08, applicants record was administratively corrected to include award of the Prisoner of War Medal, for the period of 8 Mar 6 May 45, while a POW in Germany. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal for injuries he received in action against an enemy of the United States...
On 25 Apr 02, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP advised the applicant that his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlistment Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge, was administratively corrected to reflect his POW status from 18 Nov 44 – 26 May 45 and award of the POW Medal and Distinguished Unit Citation. The FY97 NDAA designated those members interned in Siberia as eligible for the POW Medal and a $2.50 daily subsistence allowance. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00263
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating, in part, that applicant’s plane was shot down on 23 Mar 44, over Brunswick, Germany, and he was held as a POW from 23 Mar 44 to 29 Apr 45. His DD Form 214, states no wounds received in action. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...