ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
AUG 1 4 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 94-01611
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
RESUME OF CASE:
The Board considered applicant's request that the retirement
years ending 7 January 1984, 7 January 1985, and 7 January 1986,
be changed to satisfactory years of Federal service for
retirement purposes.
The Board found insufficient basis to
excuse the untimely filing of the application and were not
persuaded that the record raised issued of error or injustice
which required resolution on the merits. A complete copy of the
Record of Proceedings is attached at E.
In an undated letter the applicant provided additional
documentation and requested reconsideration of his application.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit F.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After thoroughly
reviewing the evidence of record and the additional documentation
submitted by applicant, we are still not persuaded that he has
been the victim of an error or injustice. The statement provided
by applicant is noted; however, it does not persuade us that the
applicant's civilian position prevented him from completing
reserve duty. To the contrary, the statement indicates that the
applicant's employer has supported him through the years as a
reservist and will continue to support him in the future. While
the applicant's civilian position may have made it difficult to
complete reserve duty, it did not make it impossible. We find no
evidence that the applicant was treated any differently than
other individuals similarly situated. In the absence of evidence
that the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
f
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented
did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; that the application was denied without a personal
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 4 March 1998, under the provisions of AFI
3 6 - 2 6 0 3 :
Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Panel Chair
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Member
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Member
Mr. Phillip E. Horton, Examiner (without vote)
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 14 Dec 94, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant,
Available documentation reflects that: On 9 March 1997, the applicant filed a complaint with the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF/IGQ) alleging the squadron commander reprised against him for a protected disclosure by removing him from his lieutenant colonel position in the squadron and reassigning him to a captain’s position in the group. Applicant’s complete statement, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. By letter dated 19 October 1999, applicant provided the results of his request for a...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-00453
Available documentation reflects that: On 9 March 1997, the applicant filed a complaint with the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF/IGQ) alleging the squadron commander reprised against him for a protected disclosure by removing him from his lieutenant colonel position in the squadron and reassigning him to a captain’s position in the group. Applicant’s complete statement, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. By letter dated 19 October 1999, applicant provided the results of his request for a...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not selected for an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position based on the fact that he did not have Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) accomplished in a timely manner. During this time, EPRs were an optional item of the AGR application and included at the discretion of the applicant. A complete copy of the ARPC/CV evaluation is at Exhibit...
The IG investigation was completed on 18 March 1998, and found two of the applicant’s 15 allegations (performance feedback was not completed, as indicated on the report and the rater falsified the report when he indicated otherwise) substantiated. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that it...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1994-03988
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 94-03988 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was not found medically disqualified for continued service in the Air Force Reserve and transferred to the Honorary Retired Reserve Section. A complete copy of the SG evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 94-03988 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was not found medically disqualified for continued service in the Air Force Reserve and transferred to the Honorary Retired Reserve Section. A complete copy of the SG evaluation is at Exhibit...
In the opinion of the voting members, the applicant should not have been recommended for promotion by the 1 October 1990 Air Force Reserve Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Board. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. The Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, dated 16 March 1998, awarded the applicant the minimum number of points for satisfactory service for the Retention/Retirement Years ending (RYE) 22 March 1995, 22 March 1996, and 14 June 1996, fExhibit In...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01144A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-01144 INDEX CODE 106.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his 1998 dishonorable discharge be upgraded to under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge. On 8 Jul 96, the US Air Force Court of...
Available records reflect that the applicant was retired from the Air Force Reserve on 16 December 1996 by reason of medical disqualification, in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6). However, we do not find evidence that the applicant’s commander approved a recommendation for promotion. Exhibit H. Medical Records.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02848
Available records reflect that the applicant was retired from the Air Force Reserve on 16 December 1996 by reason of medical disqualification, in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6). However, we do not find evidence that the applicant’s commander approved a recommendation for promotion. Exhibit H. Medical Records.