Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9701745
Original file (9701745.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MKTTER OF: 

DOCE(ET NO:  97-01745 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

pCT  2  2 y&J 

Applicant  requests  that  his  undesirable  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an  honorable 
discharge.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 
The  facts  surrounding  his  separation  from  the  A x   Force  are  contained  in  his 
military records which are attached a t  Exhibit B. 
On  2  July  1975,  the  Air  Force  Discharge  Review  Board  (AFDRB)  denied  the 
applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge. 
After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the  available  evidence  of 
record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or  injustice  to  warrant  corrective 
action.  Absent persuasive  evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, 
appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were  not 
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board  staff is directed  to inform  applicant of  this decision.  Applicant should 
also be  informed that this decision  is final and will only be  reconsidered  upon  the 
presentation of  new  relevant  evidence  which  was  not reasonably  available  at the 
time the application was filed. 
Members  of  the  Board  Mr.  Wayne  R.  Gracie,  Mr.  Michael  P.  Higgins,  and 
Mr. Kenneth  L.  Reinertson,  considered  this application  on  30 September  1997  in 
accordance with the provisions of A n  Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing 
statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. 

Exhibits: 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 

WAYNE R. GRACIE 
Panel Chairman 

Information Bulletin 

UPGRADE'OF DISCHARGE - CLEMENCY 

your request to have your discharge upgraded m a y  be based on propriety 
or equity. Additionally, even though your discharge may have been entirely 
appropriate under the circumstances, you may apply to the Air Force Board for 
Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) for upgrade of your discharge from the 
Air Force 011  the basis of clemency.  To evaluate your request for a clemency 
. 
upgrade, the members of the Board will want to know about the quality of your 
military service prior to the misconduct that caused the discharge, the nature of 
that misconduct, and what you have done with your life since your discharge. 

- 

Often the quality of service and the nature of the misconduct are apparent 
to the Board from a review of your service records.  If the records are missing or 
incomplete, however, you should tell the Board about your military service, 
especially your positive contributions to the military mission.  You should also 
explain the misconduct that led to your discharge and provide any extenuating or 
mitigating factors.  Finally, you should provide the Board with information on 
your activities since leaving the service. 

Post-service information might include educational accomplishments, 

employment history, information about your family, contributions to your 
community, and character references from people who know you well and can 
vouch for your honesty and integrity.  Any information that will tend to show that 
you have been a productive member of your community since your discharge will 
be helpful. 

Many applicants don't send character references because they don't want to 

reveal the nature of their discharge to friends or acquaintances. -This is 
unfortunate.  It is not normally necessary for you to reveal the purpose of the 
character reference.  You may.request it for "personal reasons" and have it 
addressed 'ToTV'hom It May Concern." The author need only discuss your character 
and citizenship in general terms - it is not necessary for them to know about or 
comment on the discharge itself.  The person providing the character reference 
should not send it directly to the AFBCMR, but should give it to you SO you can 
attach it to your request. 

The decision of the Board on your request will depend on many factors, but 
the primary factors are the quality of your military service before the miscnndu& 
that led to your discharge, the nature of that misconduct, and your good 
citizenship since your discharge.  The upgrade of a discharge on the basis c 
clemency does not mean that the discharge was improper or unwarranted. 
means simply that the Secretary of the Air Force, acting through the AFBC:  1, has 
:at a 
decided that you have suffered the effects of the discharge lo&  enough ani 
degree of clemency is warranted. 

' 

This information is compiled to assist you.  We  do not wish to imply t 
following this advice will necessarily result in approval of your request.  Th 
Board will decide your case based on its evaluation of the evidence. 

; 

Should you have any questions, please call us at AC 301 981-3502. 

The AFBCMR Staff 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02930

    Original file (BC-2004-02930.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02930 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1958 under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. Given the lack of an FBI arrest record, we would have been willing to consider the applicant’s request on the basis of clemency. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00299

    Original file (BC-2006-00299.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The board recommended he be discharged because of unsatisfactory duty performance with a general discharge without rehabilitation. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting upgrading the applicant’s discharge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00424

    Original file (BC-2006-00424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19 Apr 74, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), for a period of six years. Punishment imposed was a reduction in grade to airman (E-2) and forfeiture of $100 for one month; (10) O/a 3 and 4 Apr 78, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to his prescribed place of duty on time. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02065

    Original file (BC-2007-02065.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-02065 in Executive Session on 14 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 Sep 07, w/atchs. Air Force Review Boards Agency

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-02122B

    Original file (BC-1993-02122B.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    An accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the original Board’s decision is provided in the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 31 Aug 05, this Board reconsidered and again denied the applicant’s appeal for an honorable discharge and an amended narrative reason, concluding the post-service information he provided was meager and insufficient to overcome his misconduct while in the service and, according to the FBI report,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1985-03480B

    Original file (BC-1985-03480B.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1985-03480 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 23 February 1985, the applicant submitted an application requesting that his undesirable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03411

    Original file (BC-2007-03411.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 May 1986, the applicant was notified of his commander's intent to recommend him for a general discharge for misconduct. On 20 December 1996, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Jan 08, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9100800

    Original file (9100800.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit J. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MIB SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800 I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9100800A

    Original file (9100800A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit J. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MIB SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800 I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01143

    Original file (BC-2003-01143.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further acknowledged he understood he could receive a discharge under conditions other than honorable and receive an undesirable discharge that could deprive him of any rights to receive veterans’ benefits in the future. On 30 August 1957, the base and wing commanders recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge with an undesirable discharge. The discharge authority approved the discharge on 9 September 1957 and ordered an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions...