NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700409
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700410
Discharge Process Charge(s) Preferred: NOT FOUND IN RECORDCharge(s) and Specification(s): NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Submitted SILT request: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) NOT FOUND IN RECORD BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORD Reason...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700411
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700412
After a thorough review of all available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative errors on the original DD Form 214:,, should read: “760519 ” “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS”The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700413
The Board voted 5-0 that the characterization of service shall change to Honorable.The Commander of USS SACRAMENTO (AOE 1) chose to discharge the Applicant by recommending the Applicant’s discharge to BUPERS by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure with a service characterization of honorable. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700414
Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700415
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative errors on...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700416
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20050408 - 20050728Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20050729Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060310Length of Service: 00 Yrs 07Mths12 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700417
No other narrative reason for separation or characterization could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged.Issue 3 (): The Applicant claims he did not know the unprescribed drug he took was an amphetamine. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700418
Recommendation: NA.20031021: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Administrative separation physical for desertion. Recommendation: NA Discharge Process Charge(s) and Specification(s):NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Submitted SILT request: NOT FOUND IN RECORDCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Discharged: 20031028 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700419
The Board reviewed the post-service documentation provided by the Applicant and recognizes the efforts he has made since his separation from the Naval Service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700420
Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700421
” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700422
However, even if the Applicant could document his claims this would neither amount to a justification nor to a defense for the Applicant’s own misconduct.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700423
” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700434
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ 99 JUN 08 ” “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ” “ PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700435
If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700436
Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19980626) Separation Authority (date): CNO WASHINGTON DC (19980820)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19981015 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700437
The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning, the award of three nonjudicial punishment (NJP)for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ),Article 81 (Conspiracy), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 87 (Missing movement), and Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700438
Date:20071129 Location:Washington D.CRepresentation: Discussion In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700439
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700440
Issue 2 ().The Applicant further contends his discharge was based on one isolated incident in “ 34 months ” of service. Additionally, the board has determined that no other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700441
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “CONTINUOUS ACTIVE SERVICE 19960314 TO 20011115 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700442
The violation of USCM Article 112a forms the basis for the Applicants administrative discharge based on misconduct due to drug abuse. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700444
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in his discharge and the characterization of his service. Awarded - FOP ($398.00 for 1 month); RIR (E-1).19920714: Retention Warning violation of UCMJ Article 86 and violation of UCMJ Article 92.19920918: NJP - Viol UCMJ Art. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700445
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214: “ Continous Honorable active service from 94 SEP 29 through 98 JAN 03 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700446
No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700447
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative errors on the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700448
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. ”...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700449
Violations of Articles 92 and 128 constitute the “commission of a serious offense”, which forms the basis for discharge in this case. The Applicant was properly processed for separation by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, Article 3630600 (for the period in question) directs that Block 28 contain the phrase “Misconduct – commission of a serious offense” when separating under these conditions.Since no other Narrative Reason...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700450
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19991025 - 19991110Active:19951102 - 1998042119991111 - 29939419 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030411Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20060623Length of Service: 03 Yrs 02Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA:...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700458
Upon reviewing the medical and service record, information received from Applicant, including letters written by the Applicant’s father and social worker, the Board determined that the Applicant did not fraudulently enlist into the Navy. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700459
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found that Dissenting Opinion One board member voted to change the characterization to honorable based on the Applicant’s evaluation marks, overall performance and clear diagnosis of personality disorder. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700461
In such cases, the member remains subject to all standards of Naval discipline; however, members who have voluntarily extended service beyond their EAS for the specific purpose of medical treatment and are being processed for administrative separation must be advised that they may decline further medical treatment and request immediate separation without further administrative separation processing. In the absence of such evidence, the Board presumed that proper regulatory procedures were...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700462
Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service:References:Additional Statements From Applicant: ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700463
The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700465
The Applicant was subsequently discharged for commission of a serious offense.After a thorough review of the records, testimony, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700466
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER. After review, the Board determined that the Separation Authority’s decision to characterize the Applicant’s service as general (under honorable conditions) was within his authority. Normally, service members involuntarily separated for a personality disorder receive an honorable characterization of service absent evidence of misconduct or poor performance in their service record.
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700467
Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of all available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note an administrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700468
Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service certain serious offenses warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700469
Issue 2 (): The Applicant states his discharge was based on one isolated incident. After a thorough review of all available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative errors on the original DD Form 214:, should read: “ NAVY USN” “ MISCONDUCT ” The NDRB will recommend to the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700470
The Applicant’s service was one occasion of nonjudicial punishment for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 107[False Official Statement (2 specifications)]. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700471
Accordingly, this misconduct substantiates the reason for his separation as well as his characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19940513) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19940615)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19940622 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700472
With regard to the Applicant’s request to have his narrative reason for discharge changed the NDRB will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The Naval Military Personnel Manual 1910-142, for the period in question directs that Block 28 contain the word “MISCONDUCT” when separating under these conditions.To change the narrative reason for separation would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700473
The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge....
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700486
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20051205 - 20060111Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060112Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060331Length of Service: 00 Yrs 02Mths20 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700487
Without this additional documentation, and evidence of other post service endeavors, (i.e., evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities), the Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700488
Additionally, the Applicant met the requirements for separation processing due to drug abuse by testing positive on a unit sweep urinalysis. There is, however, evidence in the record that the Applicant waived his right to consult with counsel and waived his right to an Administrative Board during the administrative discharge process.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700489
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19990804 - 20000530Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000531Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060223Length of Service: 05 Yrs 08Mths24 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700490
Additionally, there was no justification for upgrading the Applicant’s characterization of discharge based on a material change in the law.Issue3 (Propriety):The Applicant further contends that he was incorrectly diagnosed,by the Navy,as having a Personality Disorder.His claim andrequest for the narrative reason be changed to Adjustment Disorder is based on a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder,made by his psychologist, one year prior to Applicant’s enlistment into Navy. Discharge Process Date...