Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700416

Original file (ND0700416.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
ND07-00416

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070216 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE) Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Applicant request Re-code change to re-enlist in the military
                           2. Applicant claims his discharge is inequitable because “it was based on hearsay”.
                           3. Applicant claiming youth and immaturity for his bad decisions.
                           4. Post-service - Equity
.
Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE) .

Date: 20 080110             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

Discussion

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ) : The Applicant contends that he never used drugs and admitted usage because he felt he had no other choice. The Applicant states “ I regret making the statement I made and regard it as the biggest mistake I have ever made. ” The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Navy is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to ensure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. Your self-admission to drug use is considered as “ wrongful use of a controlled substance ” punishable under the UCMJ, Article 112a. The NRDB found that the Applicant ’ s service was equitably characterized.

Issue 3 ( ) : The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his "youth and immaturity." While he may feel that his immature decisions were the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions.

Issue 4 ( ) : There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20050408 - 20050728              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20050729      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20060310
Length of Service : 00 Yrs 07 Mths 12 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 64          Highest Rank /Rate : A R
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A              OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20050406:        Applicant admitted pre-service drug use (marijuana) on signed DD form 2807 report of medical history.

20060120 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Absent without leave, viol UCMJ Art. 92 (3 Specs), f ailure to obey a lawful order .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 150.00 ) for ( 1 month); Restr for ( 45 days) 15 days suspended for 90 days ; Extra duties ( 45 days) 15 days suspended for 90 days .

20060120:        Retention Warning for article 86-Unauthorized Absence and Article 92-disobeying a lawful order.

20060215:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 81- Conspiracy ; Art 92 (2 specs) ; Art . 107 false official statement and Art. 112a – wrongful use of a controlled substance.
         Awarded - FOP ($589.00) for (2 months); Restr for (45 days), vacation of 15 days restriction and extra duty from CO’s NJP held on 20060120 .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20060223
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20060224
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20060224 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST ( 20060309 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20060310

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 81, 92, 107 and 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700301

Original file (MD0700301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000531 - 20001016Active: 20001017 - 20041001 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20041002Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060321Length of Service: 01 Yrs 05Mths19 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700585

Original file (ND0700585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warnings and 4 nonjudicial punishments for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 86 (unauthorized absence), 92 (dereliction of duty) and 134 (incapacitating oneself for performance of duties). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700763

Original file (ND0700763.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Each violation of UCMJ Article 91 and 92constitutes the “commission of a serious offense” which forms the basis for the Applicant’s discharge and is punishable by a dishonorable discharge and up to three years of imprisonment for each specification. Discharge Process Date Notified: 20060206Reason for Discharge:-Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20060206 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700548

Original file (ND0700548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

An upgrade of characterization of service is not warranted. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20030630 - 20030728Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030729Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060505Length of Service: 02...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700152

Original file (ND0700152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Violation of UCMJ Article 89 (Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward a non-commissioned officer, and Article 128 (Assault upon a petty officer) are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20060224 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s)...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700475

Original file (MD0700475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Failure to correct deficiencies may result or further violations of the UCMJ may result in judicial proceedings or administrative separation. 20060120 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) (20050120) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): CG 3 rd MAW (20050328) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700433

Original file (MD0700433.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

VACATE (20060125) SJA review (date): (20060131)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 3D MARINE DIVISION (20060131) Finding: PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTS MISCONDUCT Action: SUSPENDED DISCHARGE VACATEDDate Applicant Discharged:20060216 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701093

Original file (MD0701093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. 20050318: Vacate FOP for 1 month, Restr and Extra duties for 45 days awarded at NJP dated 20050116.20050331: MARCORSEPMAN 6105...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700265

Original file (MD0700265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

19930423: NJP imposed and suspended on 19930409 for a period of 6 months vacated.19930803: CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 19930824 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930823) SJA review (date): (19930830) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST Marine Division (19930910) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700367

Original file (ND0700367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by 2 retention warnings, 6 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (unauthorized absence), 90 (willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer), 91 (insubordinate conduct towards a master chief petty officer), 92 (failure to obey written regulation), 95 (resistance), 112 (drunk on duty), 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) and 134 (unlawful entry) of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700416

Similar Decisions