Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700419

Original file (ND0700419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PRAA, USN
ND07-00419

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070215 Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issue :       1. Post service


Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Date: 20 071025                                     Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue 1: The Applicant admits that he made a mistake in using illegal drugs and has requested an upgrade in the characterization of his discharged based on post service activities. T he Board reviewed the post-service documentation provided by the Applicant and recognizes the efforts he has made since his separation from the Naval Service. The Applicant is advised, however, that there is no law or regulation, which provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant has provided documentation of his educational pursuits , credible evidence of a substance-free lifestyle, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities , but could also have provided other examples of post-service conduct to include proof of community service . The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”
         “ MISCONDUCT ”
         “ COAST GUARD UNIT COMMENDATION, MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP) 19981110 - 19981129 Active: USMCR(J)19970329 - 19970404 ELS
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19981130               Years Contracted :                 Date of Discharge: 20010622
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 06 Mths 23 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 53          Highest Rank /Rate : PR3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.3 ( 3 )       Behavior: 2.3 ( 3 )          OTA: 2.92
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): COAST GUARD UNIT COMMENDATION, MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20010517 :         NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20010514, tested positive for THC.

20010531 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a - Wrongfully use marijuana.
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 584.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20010604
Reason for Discharge:     -
Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20010604
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review                                /ADMIN BOARD PROCESSING

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20010607 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET ( 20010619 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20010622

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Quest Recovery Services assessment report
Redwood Toxicology Laboratory reports (2)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, dated 20 Feb 01, effective 12 Feb ruary 2001 until
15 Jul y 2001, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800687

Original file (ND0800687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001396

Original file (MD1001396.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service and record entries, a letter of reference submitted on behalf of the Applicant, and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901032

Original file (MD0901032.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20090316 Characterization of Service Received: Narrative Reason for Discharge: Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20010123 - 20010219 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010220 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge: 20050219...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700805

Original file (ND0700805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19890721 - 19890725Active: 19890726 - 20010207 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010208Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20011130Length of Service: 00 Yrs 09Mths22 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900112

Original file (ND0900112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service, the UCMJ violations involved, and lack of post service documentation.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001872

Original file (ND1001872.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing educational opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801646

Original file (MD0801646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Despite the Applicant’s specific request for a “BCD ” , the NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s caseto determine if clemency is warranted. The Applicant has requested an upgrade in his discharge characterization to “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700647

Original file (ND0700647.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Absent any documentation provided by the Applicant for the Board to consider, the Board determined that the Applicant’s service record did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20010604) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER AMPHIBGRUTHREE (20010608)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700714

Original file (MD0700714.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Date: 20071205Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20031201 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20040104) SJA...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900395

Original file (MD0900395.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board voted 5-0 to upgrade the characterization of the discharge to an “Honorable.” However, by unanimous vote, the narrative reason for the discharge, “Condition not a disability” shall remain as issued. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700419

Similar Decisions