Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700442

Original file (ND0700442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MSSN, USN
ND07-00442

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070223 Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630620

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change :

Applicant’s Issues:       1 . VA Loan eligibility .
                           2. Personal satisfaction.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 071025                                     Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ): Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with the standards of discipline of the naval service. Based upon the record, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. A n other than honorable characterization of service is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Ap plicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment s and two retention warnings for violations of UCMJ Articles 91 ( insubordinate conduct, 5 specifications ) and 11 2 a ( wrongful use of a controlled substance) . The violation of USCM Article 112a form s the basis for the Applicants administrative discharge based on misconduct due to drug abuse . For the information of the Applicant, v iolations of UCMJ Article 112a carry a penalty of a dishonorable discharge and up to 5 year s of imprisonment if adjudicated by a court martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade .

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19930114 - 19930523              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19930524      Years Contracted : ; Extension:         Date of Discharge: 19961002
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 04 Mths 09 D ys                                     Lost Time :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment: 20     AFQT: 44          Highest Rank /Rate : MS3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.9                   Behavior: 3.7              OTA: 3.93 (3)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, NAVY EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19940318:        Retention Warning : Violation of UCMJ Article 91 (d isrespect to a s enior p etty o fficer ) , 86 ( unauthorized absence , pl ace of duty ) , and 92 ( disobeying a lawful order ) on 19940316.

19941021:        NJP - Viol UCMJ Art. 91 (3 specifications, f ail to obey a lawful order issued by a petty o fficer, disrespectful in language toward a p etty o fficer, disrespectful in deportment toward a p etty o fficer ) .
         Awarded - Restr (30 days); Extra duties (30 days) [Extracted from CO’s message] .

1 9941024:        Retention Warning: Violations of U C MJ, Art. 91 ( 3 Spec ifications) .

19960910 :        NJP - Viol UCMJ Art. 112a (w rongful use of a controlled substance, i.e. marijuana ) on or about 19960910 .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 558.00 for 2 months); RIR ( E-3 ); Restr ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       19960917
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -

Least Favorable Characterization:        OTHER THAN HONORABLE

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19960917
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19960924 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMLOGGRU TWO ( 19960930 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19961002

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900581

Original file (ND0900581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700866

Original file (ND0700866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 981214 UNTIL 021017 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801139

Original file (ND0801139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT - . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted,...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400906

Original file (ND1400906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600551

Original file (ND0600551.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 7) and (Member 4)Letter from A_ L_, Applicant’s mother, undatedReport of Mental Status Exam by R_ D. K_, Ph D, dtd December 8, 2005 (4 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901521

Original file (MD0901521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901758

Original file (ND0901758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted for any other reason (e.g., member meets minimum criteria for misconduct processing.) On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900615

Original file (MD0900615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the characterization of service received, Bad Conduct Discharge, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service, the UCMJ violations involved, and lack of post-service documentation.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001151

Original file (MD1001151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant was separated from the Marine Corps on 2 Oct 96 with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Marines, regardless of his grade and length of service, and falls far short of what is required for an upgrade in the characterization of service.Summary:...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001891

Original file (ND1001891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700442

Similar Decisions