NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5210 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considere@ the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 5420 MMEA dated 29 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5217-13
NR5217-13 24 Feb 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy — Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. (3) Subject’s naval record 1. -Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was paid “Half” Involuntary Separations Pay (ISP) when he was discharged 2 May 2011. .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5219 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 5420 MMEA dated 29 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5235 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board further concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5240-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5242 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. As such you agreed to enlist in the Navy Reserve fora period of eight years and complete eight weeks of basic military training prior to enrollment in the BOOST Program... You were advised and acknowledged that failure to complete BOOST for any reason, other than misconduct, could result in discharge and that if disenrollment from it was due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5244 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5245 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 June 1971 you were again convicted by SPCM of a 177 day period of UA and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, a $180...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5246 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 17 May 1971, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5247 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5248 13
pocument.ary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error OF injustice. applying for 4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13
NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5257 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 17 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5258 13
NR5258-13 22 Nov 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: {a} Title 10 U.&.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill Benefits to his dependents. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5264-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 | JBH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5266 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the additional evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5267-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5270 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisionsof reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established entitlement to payment of 5 days lump sum leave (LSL) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 December 2013 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5272 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in-support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, ‘the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5274-13
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/253 of 20 Aug 2013 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was a@vanced to E-4/CTR3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following: corrective action. an RECOMMENDATION : That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5275 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 December 2013 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5278 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to credit back of annual leave erroneously charged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5279 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5282 13
NR5282-13 2 Dec 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: — Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5286 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient Co establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5291 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5296 13
NR5296-13 3 Dec 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5297 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5299 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 5299-13 15 October 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD oF
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR53-13
The Board, acting as a special board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Vogt, reviewed Subject’s case on 15 February 2013 and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be © taken on the available evidence of record. documents related to the FY 09 SRB; (3) ‘Show he was retired on his MRD of 1 January 2011, rather than i October 2009 and (4) Change his separation code to reflect voluntary retirement. c, That any material directed to be removed from Subject's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5301-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Board Certified Pay (BCP) from 1 January 2010 through 30 September 2011. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5304-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5307 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO5307-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5308 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 14 May 2014. On 22 January 1991, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5309 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 14 May 2014. On 15 June 1995, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5317 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-4 reentry code in light of your misconduct, personality disorder, and non-recommendation for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5320 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 14 May 2014. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5322 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5333 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 14 May 2014. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5337 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner signed and accepted her Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office on 28 September 2012 vice 30 November 2012. x 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 December 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR534 13
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies oy after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5353 13
Ara PAE ee uu ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary Of the Navy SE (a) Title 10 U.B.G.. 1552 (1) DD Form 14° w/attachments (2) Advisory Opinion (A/O) from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) meme Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) Co¢rdinator, Wounded Warrior Regiment of 16 Apr 2014 (3) Chronologi¢al Record of Medical Care of 24 Aug 2009 and Radiology j.esults ico fof 25 Apr 2009 Statement rom of 27 Apr 2014 Statement ‘rom of 25...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5355 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5358 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. The sentence at your SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5359 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The sentence at your SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5369 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5372 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5374 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5377 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness and repetitiveness of your misconduct that resulted in five NJPs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5380 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...