DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
aa RA IDTUS In mom oir aga
PM SOU Reece Ge Sota 19n4
‘ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket :NR05274-13
26 August 2023
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO i,
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/253
of 20 Aug 2013
1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
a@vanced to E-4/CTR3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement
examination.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 26 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies.
3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
Docket No.NRO5274-13
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board.
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following:
corrective action. . an
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, .
as follows:. . * aytG™ = oe
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/CTR3 From the March.2012
Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16
September 2012 and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2012.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c}) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal.
Regulations, Section 723.6{c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Drumkr d Mentyoasy
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY
Recorder Acting Recorder
Bs Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction. of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken. under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
26 August 2013
Ta ES, fom
Foon W. DEAN PFELFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11006 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-4/CTR3 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4169-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3410-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tie Ce oie eo Tes Gon fae PE See Nar TY TPL a ae ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NR03410-13 22 August 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF - RECORD 1CO (i, Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3473-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/AZ2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and for the change in rank to be reflected on her DD Form 214. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and,. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3503-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4691-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5165-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MA1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5122 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two points for his Individual Augmentation (IA) from June 2011 to April 2012 for the September 2012 E-6 Navy-wide advancement examination. Docket No.NR05122-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all.the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...