DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. CGURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
CRS
# Docket No: 5267-13
1 April 2014
|
il
This is in reference. to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant: to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 January 2014. Your allegations of error and |
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful. and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient td establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. - ma j
The Board found that you enlisted in. the Navy on 21 July 2004.
On 9 September 2004 your commanding officer directed that you be
separated based on your lying at the: Moment of ‘Truth about a
suicide attempt and psychiatric history.*--On 20 September 2004
_ you received an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason
of fraudulent entry and were assigned a reentry, code of RE-4,
The’ Board noted that a reentry code of RE-4 is required by
regulatery guidance to'be dssigned-to sérvice members separated
by reason of fraudulent’ entry. Since you have been treated no
differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reentry
code. The Board did not accept your contention to the effect
that the reports made at the time of your discharge are no
longer accurate or correct. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted. that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption’ of régularity attaches to all offictAl records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ete ’
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN.
_Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0637 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Cénsequently, when applying for a correction of an official Yaval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5739 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03779-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2723 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Marines discharged by reason of a medical condition normally are assigned an RE-3P reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0287 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 November 2011, you signed and acknowledged that you were being administratively separated due to fraudulent entry based on your failure to disclose vital mental health information which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4371 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,-together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2444-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that by review of your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), it appears that medical personnel...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0257 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0694 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 4 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0669 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board found those factors were insufficient to warrant any change in your reentry code, given your diagnosed condition, record of fraudulent entry and non- recommendation for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...