NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5000 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2014. However, the Board concluded that your application should be denied due to your failure to complete a minimum of 180 days of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5007 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 22 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5008 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your post service conduct and desire to upgrade your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5011 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion of being administratively separated without committing a criminal offense. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5017 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5019 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5027 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2) OCNO Memo 1050 Ser N130C/1301004 dtd 19 Nov 13 (3} Subject'’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established entitlement to payment of 60 days lump sum leave (LSL) . A copy of this Report of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5028-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5029 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR503 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. As a result, an ADB recommended separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and your commanding officer, in concurrence with the ADB, also recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5033 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Mr. pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice - on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5037 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5059 13
By letter of 11 April 2013, you requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 15 September 2008. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR507 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5096 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION : a. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR51 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That rating, which was established by Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating officials and assigned by the Physical Evaluation Board during the Integrated Disability Evaluation process, was based on the demonstrated limitation of motion of your spine. Inthis regard, it is important to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5103-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/CS3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination and that he receive retroactive pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR511 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5116 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SON Docket No: 5116-13 24 June 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: aa ss NAVAL RECORD OF PG Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his bad conduct discharge (BCD) received on 24...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5117 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on -27 June 1973.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5120 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5123-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Board Certification Pay (BCP) for the period of SP . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5130-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record bé corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5131 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5132-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. L. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board | requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was paid “Half” Involuntary Separations. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and -especlaily in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5133 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your numerous acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5135 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1081 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR5135-13 29 Apr 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy “Sa, Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust entitlement to Basic...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5136-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner be given proper Entry Grade Credit (EGC) upon commissioning for his Master's degree in Kinesiology. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, 4salman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of “error and injustice on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that’ the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5139 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. NR5139-13 14 Apr 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy me ST ee Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust the entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5140 13
' DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TJR Docket No: 5140-13 9 October 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Ta: Secretary of the Navy REV 1 EW NAVAL RECORD OF -
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5146 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material’ submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5153 13
Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5154-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS meg BE PY Ser Ie map DIT 4am cede Te tet RE hes Ted thee - ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract and issue an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5164 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5165-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MA1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5166-13
COURTHOUSE RO SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NRO5166-13 12 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to receive Overseas Tour Extension Incentives Program (OTEIP) pay, Option D, fron {? Pursuant to the delegation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5167 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5168 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 22 September 1972, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5169 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/1400394 dtd 9 Apr 14 (3) Subject’s naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust entitlement to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAKE). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5170 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You exercised your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5171 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a. former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1), with., this Board requesting, in effect, that his separdtion. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval” records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. He was so discharged on 21 September 1992, c. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's policies, standards, and procedures for administratively separating...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5176 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record he corrected to issue an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5179 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found those factors insufficient to warrant changing the characterization of your discharge, given your NJP, narrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR518 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your repetitive misconduct which resulted in two NJPs and a conviction by civil authorities, and your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5184-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2013. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5185-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2013. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5187-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ‘of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR519 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your lengthy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5192 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. You exercised your procedural right have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 11 December 2012, you received a general under honorable conditions characterization of service due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5194 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 September 2005. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ,existence of probable material error or injustice.