NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07658 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2012. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07723 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was authorized Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at her dependent’s location for the period she was on active duty. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07743 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) based on location of dependents residing in East Orange, New Jersey. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07748 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07755 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07853 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board found an aggravating factor and misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07900 12
07900-12 16 October 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF */— aaa Ref: (a) 20 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was authorized Basic Allowance for Housing at the dependent’s location. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07913 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his narrative reason for separation “condition, not a disability” and “RE-3G" (condition (not a physical disability) interfering with performance of duty) reentry code be changed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 30 June 2011, he was discharged by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07931 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was transferred to the Retired Reserve List Awaiting Pay at age 60 vice being discharged. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2012 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07990 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08056 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08074 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NOP) imposed on 18 August 2011 and the fitness report for the period From 16-19 August 2011. He further requested removal, from his official military personnel record (OMPF), any and all derogatory documentation (e.g., investigative reports, administrative discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08117 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that before he was recalled to active duty he changed his primary residence from Frisco, Texas to Costa Mesa, California. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08119 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Betitiener, & member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding, in part, child neglect and domestic assault, which is reflected on an administrative remarks entry (page 11) dated 17 November 2001 in his official military personnel record (OMPF) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, Pfeiffer, and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08146 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08240 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, ana policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08253 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08321 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 08321-12 13 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO [? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the September 2011...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08329 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08343 12
8343-12 6 Aug 13 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Navy College Fund (NCF) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08345 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 7 004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 pyc Docket No. 8345-12 27 Aug 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy x Ref: {a) Title 10 U.9.c. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsaiman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 Bugust 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08352 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. On 1 August 2012, the commanding officer denied Petitioner’s request to set aside the NUP, stating in part that, his decision to award it for the incident was based on his admitted arrest and the voluntary statement given to the command after he waived his right to remain silent. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or completely expunged from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08393 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. As you have not demonstrated that you were entitled to a disability rating of 30% or higher from the Department of the Navy as of 24 February 1993, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08548 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08557 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08558 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate che existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08597 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 1 June 2008 to 29 May 2009 (copy at Tab A) by removing section K (reviewing officer’s marks and comments). The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Chapman and Genteman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 October 2012, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08707 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08760 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08830 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0583 dtd 22 May 13 and CNRFC Email dtd 25 Jul 13, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08873 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08892 12
A three-member panel of the ‘Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08966 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08986 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09009 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09014 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09081 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. 9081-12 1 Nov 12 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Bor Secretary of the Navy Subj: — OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) ‘Title 10 U.S.¢. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09131 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S$. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09153 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to award him one additional year of entry grade credit (EGC), so that his lieutenant date of rank on his commission in the Medical Corps, U. S. Navy, will be changed from 19 May 2007 to 22 April 2006. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Spooner, Swarens and Wilson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09316 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. On 16 September 2002 you requested to be administratively separated rather be tried by court-martial for 148 days of UA and agreed to accept an other than honorable discharge (OTH). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09464 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reentry code given your record of three NJP’s, conviction by SCM, and the fact that you were counseled and warned of the consequences of further misconduct after your third NUP. The Board did not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09476 12
4 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when a) applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09489 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/12U1289 dated 13 November 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09493 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 1 June to 7 October 2011 (copy at Tab A), to make it “not observed,” or removing the report. c. Petitioner contends that the fitness report in question should have been “not observed,” as there was not enough observation time. e. Enclosure (2), the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09509 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09513 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09521 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09526 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0654 d@td 11 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09583 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion, particularly noting that block S1 (“Signature...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09596 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...