NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07064-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. The record clearly shows that on 25 April 1997, you were discharged with an OTH separation by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07082 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7018. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner received Passed but Not navanced (PNA) points from advancement ‘cycles 086, 087, and 088, in addition, that he was advanced to E-6/LS1 from the August 2011, cycle 089, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07097-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07149-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of érror and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07166 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was transferred to the Retired Reserve List Awaiting Pay at age 60 vice being discharged. v a WILLIAM J. HESS, Tit ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Recorder Recorder delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) f the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07169-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07170 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07180-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NUP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07189-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your misconduct that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07202-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07215 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07225-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07230-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding an offense of drunken or reckless driving which is reflected in his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) awarded on 15 December 2008. The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill, Mr. Marquez, and Mr. McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 September 2012 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07256 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was transferred to the Retired Reserve List Awaiting Pay at age 60 vice being discharged. 07256-12 the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) Board for Correction of Naval Records Section 723.6(e)) and having assured e...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07261 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@ your application on 26 August 2013. In addition, the Board’ considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 1530 Ser N133/168 dated 24 October 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07265-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07272-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. The Board found that your FY 2012 failure of selection should stand as well, since it found insufficient basis to modify your fitness report record;...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07274-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your misconduct that resulted in two NJP’s, two SPCM convictions of very lengthy periods of UA, charges being preferred to a court-martial for periods of UA totaling...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07279-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07290-12
the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or inj...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07293 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. Note: full payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to the member who has entered into a written agreement with the Navy to Serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07295-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07307-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07329-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected by removing an Administrative Remarks (NAMVC 118) page 11 entry he received on 22 February 2012. The Board, consisting of Mr. Boyd, Mr. Genteman, and Mr. Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 July 2012, and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07360-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07367-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the narrative reason for separation be changed. With that being said, the Board concludes that a change of the narrative reason for separation should now be based on Petitioner’s overall satisfactory post- service conduct, the expunging of his civil record, and the ASN decision to change his characterization of service. In this regard, the Board concludes that it is now more...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07370-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07374-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07378 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07397 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 07397-12 20) November 2012 ¢ Correction of Naval Records Chairman, Board fo From: To: secretary of the Navy sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1 _ EY Ref: (a) Title 16 U.S. 1552 Encl 1) DD Form 149 w/attachments Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser B12/0548 (a) Petitioner filed in effect, that the ow that Petitioner's ination, of reference requesting, ted to sh rve advancement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07402-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07417 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Unfortunately you only served a little over one year and five months when you were administratively separated with an other than honorable discharge (OTH) due to your commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07418 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 2 April 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07424-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,, and policies. Your request for discharge was granted and on 23 June.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07425 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her record be corrected by removing three Administrative Remarks (NAMVC 118) page 11 entries she received on 28 February, 17 May, and 14 June 2007. The Board, consisting of Mr. Lacrois, Mr. Rothlein, and Mr. Vogt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 November 2012, and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07448-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 10 May 1975, you were counseled regarding your frequent involvement with military authorities and warned that further misconduct could result in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07468-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07476-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. On 16 October 1986, you were convicted by special court-martial of two instances of UA from your unit for a period totaling 426 days and missing ship’s movement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07487-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 December 1970, you again made a written request for discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for UA from your unit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07488-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07509-12
07509-12 25 September 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Le: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF FORMER] Ret: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, applied to this Board requesting that the other than honorable discharge (OTH) issued to him on 11 January 2006 be upgraded to honorable. d. Prior to enlisting Petitioner admitted to using marijuana but was given a waiver by Marine Corps officials based on his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07521-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 February 1965, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07525-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 February 1984, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct, ending a 1,729 day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07546-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07551-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on.15 January 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden-is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07558-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 20 January 1954, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to unfitness.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07574 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07599 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding a civil offense of driving under the influence of alcohol or driving while intoxicated which is reflected on an administrative remarks entry (page 11) dated 11 June 2009 in his official military personnel record (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill, Mr. Marquez, and Mr. McBride,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07617 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change his Performance Mark Average (PMA) from 3.60 to 3.80 for the March 2012 advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on S November 2012, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07626 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...