NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09618 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your, application, tegether with all material submitted in support, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that these factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service due to the serious nature of your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09620 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09636 12
Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09702 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were also in an unauthorized absence (UA) status for a period of six days for which no disciplinary action was taken.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09712 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 December 1975 you received your seventh NUP for two periods of absence from your appointed place of duty and a three day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09738 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09754 12
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying all four contested fitness reports, as follows: 1 August to 31 December 2009: From section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), remove “I fully expect MRO [Marine reported on] to continue making improvements and if he does” and “with his peers.” 26 June to 6 December 2010: From section K.4 (reviewing officer’s comments), remove “As a Sergeant of Marines MRO is still developing his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09781 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reimburse member for travel to the Home of Selection. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsaiman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09850 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. It is possible, even common, for a candidate to receive a passing score on an advancement exam and/or to complete minimum required advancement courses, but still not be Docket No.09850-12 actually advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09859 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09913 12
You requested modifying the fitness report for 1 July to 24 October 2011, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS‘s) letter dated 10 July 2012 with enclosure, by raising the mark in section E.1 (“Courage”) from “C” (fifth best of seven possible marks) to “D” (fourth best), E.2 (“Effectiveness Under Stress” ) from "C” to “E” (third best) and F.5 (*Communication Skills”) from “D" to WE A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10002 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10030 12
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10044 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30D2/12U1287 dtd 11 Jul 13, a copy of which is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10070 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10116 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 18 Dec 12 and CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 dtd 25 Apr 13,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10119 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, : regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 13 Feb 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10135 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 4 Mar 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10183 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10191 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 September 2011 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman and Marquez and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 March 2013, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10227 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 10227-12 2 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD > RPE NET NC Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all adverse material from his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10237 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS eye Ge RRO URL RE BOAT SLITS 4904 704 Ere Te ROAD, a ae om ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JBH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to credit member Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP) 1 April to 31 July 2011. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10246 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record contains correspondence from the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 13 July 1994 which states, in part, that the DD Form 553 (mark of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10276 12
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gattis, Hedrick and Zsalman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 23 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION : Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the letter from the Commander, Marine Forces Reserve setting aside the NUP, the Board finds an error and injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10277 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NUP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10319 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his administrative discharge of 25 March 2011 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. ZSalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10380 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10397 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10398 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 23 October 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient: to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.) Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10399 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7Ot S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906 CRS Docket No: 10399-12 14 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of separation than the discharge under other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10407 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, ain effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10422 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2012. On 11 February 2011, you did file an appeal and on 18 February 2011, your appeal was denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10462 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2013. In addition, the Board considerea the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 6 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10583 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire _¥Fecord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice... : OS The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine.Corps on 7 January 1992 after more...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10591 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10599 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10676 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtc 14 Jan 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10681 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject'’s son, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse and child to former spouse and child coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 August 2013 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10776 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10798 12
2B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No, 10798-12 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10840 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10844 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 14 Jan 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10877 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10879 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10886 12
You were recommended for separation with a general discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). The Board believed you were fortunate to receive a general Characterization of service, since Sailors who are separated due to misconduct normally receive other than honorable discharges. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11001 12
A three- ~member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11041 12
11041-12 6 Aug 13 Prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.¢c. this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 Aug 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, Getermined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11137 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BUG Docket No: 11137-12 4 December 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ow ears acm. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11161 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11169 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ma PEEL Ig eae Sie oe 74 S. COURTHOUSE ROAL, Sulte 7004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for - Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George,...