NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06101 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 CRS Docket No: 6101-12 20 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code she was assigned on 29...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06145-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2012. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06156-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the “special” enlisted performance evaluation report for 14 May to 31 August 2011 submitted by NAVMEDTRACEN Fort Sam Houston (copy at Tab A) and filing in its place the “special” report for the same period submitted by NAVHOSP BREMERTON (copy in enclosure (1)). The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06158-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2013. Documentary material considered by — the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board, on 11 February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06209-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06223-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the “applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-6/IT1 from the March 2007 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06384-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06394-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 06394-12 2 July 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF (hei Ref: (a) 19 U.8.¢. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason for separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06427-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from her enlistment. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especialiy in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06431-12
fhe ee Pe Ey 7M DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . 6431-12 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06433-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of his divorce on 15 September 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2012 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06452 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 July 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06533-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his characterization of service “other than honorable” be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 July 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06537-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his characterization of service “conditions other than honorable” be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 July 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06543-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06546-12
record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document and the Petitioner executed an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. 6546-12 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record he corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06556 12
6556-12 17 Sep 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect that Petitioner is reimbursed Per Diem and Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) while in a Temporary Duty Under Instruction (TEMDU) status from 3 August 2008 to 20...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06563 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding the pending imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for drug use which is reflected on an administrative remarks entry (page 11) dated 9 August 2001 in his official military personnel record (OMPF) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, Pfeiffer, and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06568-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06573-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Prior Service Affiliation Bonus. The Petitioner executed a 6 year enlistment/reenlistment document (DD Form 4), on or about 3 October 2011. b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06614-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ‘701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to her enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. “salman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2013 and; pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06623 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06627-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 19 June 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06635 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted a support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06637 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06644 12
SNM [Subject Named Marine] received a Letter of Appreciation and Certificate of Appreciation during the reporting period.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2012. The Board also considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 6 April and 19 June 2012, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06659-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was discharged from the U. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 September 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06679 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the August 2010 E-5/IS2 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, George and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06703 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06737-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06749 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when she was discharged. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06760 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 15 May 1987. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06795-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06807 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06843 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when she was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06852-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry 8 February 2005, the page 11 entry dated 4/7/05 regarding violation of Article 128 (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the page lla entry...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06880-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06916 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 6916-12 18 October 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO¢ Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ato A A ORCS Ret: f(a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his general discharge, which he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06920-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06939 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board thus concluded that there was no error or injustice in your NUP. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06942 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06947 12
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. The absence of a service record showing the effective date of an advancement indicates that a candidate was not actually advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06951 12
Pout Or ae Se Tg ae é 2 TS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the ember 2010 to 31 May 2011 (copy at Tab Marine Corps Total Force System A) and removing, from the 25 August (MCTFS), the weight control entry for 25 February to 2011 (copy at...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06955-12
06955-12 17 September 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records eer Secretary of the Navy ae REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ret? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 19 August 2001 to 23 February 2002 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06962-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06979 12
06979-12 15 October 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect entry grade credit (EGC) for his Master’s of Science degree. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Chapman and Genteman,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07009 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07040-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 27 Nov 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07049-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman,...