DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD
. ARLINGTON, VA 22204
DIC
Docket No. 6546-12
5 Feb i123
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref : (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/226 dtd 20 Jun 12
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval. record be corrected
to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document and the Petitioner
executed an agreement to extend enlistment.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and
Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 4 February 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application,has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 6546-12
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record he corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. The enlistment/reenlistment document (DD Form 4/1, Oct
2007), executed on or about 19 November 2007 is for a term of 4 years,
vice 6 years.
b. The Petitioner executed a 24 month agreement to extend
enlistment (NAVPERS 1070/621), operative on or about 19 November 2011.
c. Note: the change will not affect the member's current End of
Active Obligated Service (EAOS): nor Soft-End of Active Obligated
Service (SEAOS).
d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board's proceedings in the above enta Pia
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
5 Feb 13 \s . .
We nena
Executive Die r
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8287-13
(a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on WEEE 2nd, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available ‘evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10734 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07496-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected. The Petitioner executed a 12 month agreement to extend enlistment, (NAVPERS 1070/621) operative on or about 2¢ August 2008. c. The Petitioner executed a 23 month agreement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11163-07
11163-07 20 May 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO-Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify reenlistment contract.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02091-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8548-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract and agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03876-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02893-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). 27 Jul 10 \a W. DEAN Executive
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2386 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. , ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02992-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...